MovieChat Forums > Shopping (1996) Discussion > Just Saw it on IFC...

Just Saw it on IFC...


and I'm sorry, but this is a ridiculously dumb and boring movie. I can't believe I wasted my time waiting for something to happen.

Where this film fails is that every single character is unlikeable. Billy is a loser....and not a lovable loser....just a loser.

Frost's accent is a joke, but she's kinda cute...which is the ONLY reason I was able to sit through this thing.

I like movies that emphasize "style" over substance just as much as the next guy, but "Shopping" failed on every level imaginable.

reply

I recorded it and just "watched" it....which amounted to my fast forwarding thorugh most of it...until about hte last half hour...

at least it has a kick ass soundtrack if nothing else

reply

spesce...

I couldn't really get into it either, but I think part of the problem is that I'm just not its target market. This film from the early nineties England seems to be targeted to a teenage audience that is in some sense rebelling from the previous era of Heavy Metal with an even more strident rendering of the emerging Rap/Hip Hop era. This movie is not made in a vacuum, so my guess is that there was something the film-makers felt they were tapping into. My reason for watching it was to see an early Jude Law film. Despite the various comments on his performance, including yours, I thought his acting was superb. Obviously his character isn't particularly admirable, but one can highlight his motivation, which is that of getting an adrenalin rush for its own sake (one might liken it to Crash) and is presumably on a higher plane than Tommie's. Thus, the ending can be said to demonstrate how even the best of a bad lot die young. (In consideration of the vandalism, however, I personally would identify with Jonathan Pryce's character.)

James


reply


It's a bit difficult to really place this movie within an audience because of the way it was released. Yes, it seemed to have been aimed at teenagers, but most of them would not have been able to see it (in the cinemas at least) cos it was released with an 18 certificate on both the big screen and video (it has only recently been downgraded to a 15 for DVD). It also had such a limited release that it has been virtually ignored since so finding it would not have been that easy.

Admittedly the film has dated but it was a very good depiction of the early 1990s when joyriding and ramraiding were nightly news subjects. The characters were stupid and shallow because they were supposed to be. Watch or listen to documentaries on joyriding and you will hear, for real, the stupidity and shallowness of the idiots who used to joyride round council estates like Blackbird Leys. There was a fair bit of realism beneath the gloss.

Shopping was very much a British film dealing with a British phenomena. It was badly hampered by a tiny budget (all the police cars were clapped out 10 year old Ford Sierras and the burning Porsche was nothing more than a mock up of the dashboard) but it did it's best with what it had. However, the acting was solid (especially so in the case of Frazer James and Sean Pertwee) but so many of the actors were tv performers with little experience of film acting. Ironically Jude Law had the biggest part but, for me, made the smallest impact.

In the end, it was a first film and a good attempt at that. The music was superb, and the highlight for me. For all the shallowness of the characters, Anderson didn't glamourise the world he depicted. There was a nihilism and destructiveness to Billy's character that was so common among many British teenagers on council estates at that time. Bored? Let's steal a Cosworth and set it on fire. Run over an innocent person? They shouldn't have got in the way. As Monkey said in the film when visiting a shrine to some dead joyriders:

"Ford Granada, latest model. The wankers drove it straight into a wall. Waste of a *beep* good car".

No regret over death, only over the destruction of a car. The ugliness of the characters and their deaths (except Billy)at the end of the film pointed to an attempt at a moral. JOYRIDING KILLS!!! Maybe that's why it's difficult to pinpoint the audience Anderson was aiming at. He styled a film that obviously was aimed at teenagers but he was deliberately criticising their world and their morality.


'Culture, sophistication, a little bit more than an 'ot dog' You said it Bob!

reply

Well put integrale. It's more about the tragedy of Billy hating himself and his life rather than an action film. The cars, Tommy, the ram-raiding, it's a backdrop to the story about an angry young man who doesn't want to love, hates himself and wants to wreck everything.

As you mention, pretty accurate view of *beep* estates and unloved people who grow up in them.

Joy. Such a happy ending too.

reply

The Target market would not have been teenagers - but rather "Art House" goers and Channel Four viewers.
The genre was known a "Zoo Cinema"(Like looking at animals in a zoo) ie films about people you would not want to know in real life, who live in suburbs that you would drive through with your windows wound up!
I saw this film back in 1994 at the Warwick Arts Centre here in Coventry and it did not get a wider release than the art house circuit in Britain.
It will have dated quite a lot - but it will be interesting to see an opinion from a viewer in 2094 :)

reply

I agree, terrible movie and awful script. I find myself watching it though because I'm a Jude Law fan but I just cannot keep from changing the channel when this movie is on. luckily Jude moved on to much bigger and better :)







"It's mercy, compassion, and forgiveness I lack; not rationality."

reply

Actually quite triumvirational although a bit like Spader's "Crash" minus the nudity and jews harps, though.

What is the sound an imploding pimp makes?

reply