You say that the puppets are good and that their master controls their behavior. Well if the master determines what they the puppets do then the puppets aren't good or bad. They're neutral and are influenced by what their master has them do. Although I don't understand how their master influences their behavior. What exactly does he do to make them follow them? I like how they're good and bad. It makes it ambiguous.
They're pretty neutral powers. The puppets actually used to be good humans, so deep down they're good. However this is never revealed in any of the films, but it's obvious these people forget their past memories and literally do turn to puppets that obey only their master.
The master they consider is probably the one who brought them back to life, in the post-Toulon days, like Neil Gallagher or Ricky Myers. If they give orders, the puppets obey, whether it's murder or not. They will rebell though if the master does something to hurt the puppets or perhaps maybe they deep down know something going with the master is wrong. Neil Gallagher was evil, wanted death, treated the puppets like dirt so they killed him. Andre Toulon broguht back as a corpse obviously made him go insane and he tried to screw them over, so they had to kill him too. Thankfully his spirit was good again.
reply
share
bobbyh64
16 years ago
According to Wikipedia Part 2 is chronologically the last film. I guess there are different orders one can put the films into and have it make sense (somewhat).
reply
share
wallacesawyer
16 years ago
According to Wikipedia Part 2 is chronologically the last film. I guess there are different orders one can put the films into and have it make sense (somewhat).
Yes, but not really. In
Puppet Master: The Legacy it came off like part 2 was the last in the storyline, they too were trying to connect the films but failed really. Also, CURSE wasn't set before part 4, that's just a theory some people have, I don't know why Wikipedia has it.
reply
share