MovieChat Forums > Pulp Fiction (1994) Discussion > ‘Pulp Fiction’ 25th Anniversary: What We...

‘Pulp Fiction’ 25th Anniversary: What We Take For Granted Now


https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/pulp-fiction-25th-anniversary-what-we-take-for-granted-now.html/

reply

hmm , seems to be just a few random thoughts on the film that everyone knew already ,
rather than some earth shattering insight gaind from a 25 year later pespective.

reply

it has all been said before.

reply

It's not what everyone knew already. To this day, there are people who don't get why this movie blew everyone away and still rant that it was nothing special. I know it's annoying to hear someone "state the obvious," but unfortunately, what made the movie revolutionary isn't that obvious.

reply

To be fair, this article isn't that good even if it makes a couple of decent points.

reply

That author forgot the most important thing: the soundtrack. It was basically someone's mix tape of super obscure vintage music. That had never, ever been done before. Soundtracks either had to be scored by a well known composer/Top 40 pop artist or be made up of well known golden oldies.

reply

The soundtrack was great and I think made it cool to be into old songs in an era locked into a lot of alt-rock orthodoxy. Although in a lot of ways, there were bands who felt open covering old or obscure songs. The Replacements had Kiss' "Black Diamond" on their "Let it Be" album and were known to cover tons of vintage artists, from Vanity Fare to Hank Williams, Jr.

My main complaint is that they used a cover of "Girl, You'll Be a Woman Soon" instead of the original Neil Diamond version.

reply

Solid point. Watched it again last night and the PF soundtrack is just as captivating as it was in '94. Another point they missed is the cinematography; it was filmed very much in a European style. Especially on the high res blu-ray, the high contrast film and somewhat cheap sets give it almost a documentary feel at times.

reply