MovieChat Forums > Natural Born Killers (1994) Discussion > why dont some people find mickey and mal...

why dont some people find mickey and mallory likeable?


I mean sure they were some sadistic freaks, but they were also sort of victims of society like most killers. It's a weak thing to turn to violence because of all your troubles but these people tend to feel that they have no real sense of family and if their own family is *beep* up, why should they care about anyone else? After awhile, you sort of become misanthropic so this kinda thing is easy for them. But I did find Mickey and Mallory's characters likeable; I mean the affection they had for eachother, him carrying her out of the snake pit and the scene where he comes to her cell. I mean, didn't you guys find that the tad bit touching? I gotta say this film is a romance in it's own rights and I liked this kind of romance far better than that whimpy the notebook crap.

And I am glad they got away in the end. There are people who wanted to see them die. Psshh, I wanna see YOU die!

reply

is someone going to answer or what?

reply

Sure why not?

I liked them, simply because they were tragic victims of their backgrounds and they were in love with each other. But what they did is chilling and amoral.

What I liked about their characters (if it means anything) is that they vanquish their demons and are able to move on and break the chain of violence in their own families. Their kids will grow up in a good family unit and they will not become killers.

reply

I often empathise with "the bad guys" in movies and cheer them on as they go to work dispatching the tedious and vaccuous cretins who happen to get in their way. Villains are almost always so much more interesting than the good guys unless of course the so called good guy is flawed and has a heart almost as dark if not darker than the villains he seeks to destroy.
Mickey and Mallory were kinda cool but unfortunately Juliette Lewis is just a bit too irritating for my liking so they arent quite as high up on my list of anti heroes as they could have been.



I watched a snail crawl along the edge of a straight razor. That's my dream; that's my nightmare. Crawling, slithering, along the edge of a straight razor... and surviving.

reply

Mickey and Mallory are an awesome couple

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Ugh...


Killing people is easy...if you can forget the taste of sugar.

reply

Mickey and Mallory were a couple of dicks. The funniest part is when they are getting bit by the snakes. God, that makes me laugh.

"Cheer up, Ed. This is not goodbye. It's just I won't ever see you again."

reply

Why didn't I find them likeable? Hmmm, let's see...

Oh, wait, I know: because they're two sick fu€ks who killed a whole lot of innocent people! They murdered dozens of people -- but wait - they loved each other, so that makes killing people okay! Geez, you Americans really got issues, don't you?
I wanted them to die, slowly and painfully if possible. According to the original poster, she'd like to see me die, then.
Come and try, wannabe poser.

reply

Well when you have all these people who think murder is amoral, killing is bad, yadda yadda praise jesus and democracy yadda yadda then it's no surprise they don't like the characters. They believe these are bad people. They are scared of such people. If they like anything about the characters they rationalize it by saying Mickey and Mal are victims, are "mentally unstable" or such, and they believe these characters need our pity and our help to be good christians. These people are washed over in pity in the second half when Mickey and Mal are having regrets about some of their killing since they see this as a light towards their moral system (which they usually ignorantly think is the only possible moral system), and then they're probably grief-stricken and angry at the ending of the film.

We who are their opposite, rather enjoy the characters, recognize their weaknesses, and are a bit happy that they succeeded in the end, even though it's far from a perfect story for them, we are living in far from a perfect world. And given the society they are set in, this is a very powerful story.



~ Observe, and act with clarity. ~

reply

It is indeed a very powerful story and a very unique and interesting film, even though I may not agree with everything Stone is trying to say here. The fact that they get away in the end IS a good ending for me since it is realistic in a way; real killers DO succeed getting away and not getting caught sometimes in this imperfect world. That being said, I can't say I am happy per se that they got away like that. I understand that they were the by-product of their environment, their heritage of violence and of the media culture in a certain way, but that doesn't remove all the irreperable damages that they have done to dozens of people (family and friends of victims, mostly) and that certainly doesn't cancel their degree of responsability related to their behaviors. I never felt pity nor real empathy for the couple during the course of the movie (they are narcissistic sadists after all). Therefore, I will admit that there was a part of me that wanted to see them suffer even more (then again I will agree that punishment and retribution alone are questionable as sole goals when it comes to delivering justice).I myself do believe in rehabilitation and do believe, like Stone, that the penal system is flawed (at least in some ways) in maximising the rehabilitation potential of the inmates. I have no doubt it can even be more harmful than helpful in some cases. But then again, I wouldn't say the penal system can be charged as downright totally accountable for the creation of violence and the development/accentuation of criminal behaviors by inmates. Fact is, most criminals have the CAPACITY (by that I mean the sufficient mental habilities) to change, but some just never DECIDE TO for multiple reasons. The capacity to change oneself is a choice in the end, and therefore people (in general, criminal as well as non criminal) are accountable and responsable for those choices, whatever they are. In a way, it is good to see Mickey and Mallory overcome their own "demons" at the end, but it is something unlikable in cases like them for sure, and even in the end it remains to be seen if they would really change their ways. So I respect Stone's vision, but somehow I can't just say I like seeing Mickey and Mallory get away (part of me would have like the alternate ending more, though this ending is the right choice nevertheless I guess).

Bill Foster: I'm the bad guy?...How did that happen?

reply

"Well when you have all these people who think murder is amoral, killing is bad, yadda yadda praise jesus and democracy yadda yadda then it's no surprise they don't like the characters. They believe these are bad people. They are scared of such people. If they like anything about the characters they rationalize it by saying Mickey and Mal are victims, are "mentally unstable" or such, and they believe these characters need our pity and our help to be good christians. These people are washed over in pity in the second half when Mickey and Mal are having regrets about some of their killing since they see this as a light towards their moral system (which they usually ignorantly think is the only possible moral system), and then they're probably grief-stricken and angry at the ending of the film.

We who are their opposite, rather enjoy the characters, recognize their weaknesses, and are a bit happy that they succeeded in the end, even though it's far from a perfect story for them, we are living in far from a perfect world. And given the society they are set in, this is a very powerful story."

There is a middle ground, y'know. I definitely think society and the culture that people like Wayne Gale propagate are worse and do a lot more damage in the long run. They're the real villains of the film. I'm not a Christian and don't think democracy is always the best system. But does that mean I like or admire Mickey and Mallory? Of course not. In fact, I think some of the best satire in the film are the idiot teenagers who are interviewed and love Mickey and Mallory, yet still think murder is wrong.

To me, Mickey and Mallory Knox are the ultimate extrapolation of our society and our values. Stone has said the film is a satire on how the media looks at serial killers, condemning them while giving them a lot of attention and ultimately promoting the same morals. In a society where logic, reason and scientific skepticism are looked down upon, Mickey and Mallory are passionate in everything they do. Mickey spouts some pseudo-philosophical crap about how he's evolved, failing to understand true Darwinian evolution (with misunderstanding evolution being a key American trademark) and instead echoing the Social Dawinism talk They think they're the ultimate rebels, but of course they do. One of the most powerful things are society has is to integrate the rebels as part of the system. The system isn't being destroyed because of Mickey and Mallory; the system thrives on Mickey and Mallory. The bloated, mindless, act-first-think-later, capitalist machine loves including them.

But does this mean I like Mickey and Mallory? *beep* no! I hate the shallow, passion-based society, so if they're the ultimate extrapolation of it, I'm not going to like them. It's this culture of dog-eat-dog, competition is good whether it's business or politics or sport, let the strong take what they need and *beep* the weak, etc. that leads someone to commit the ultimate intellectual hypocrisy, which is to take the life of someone else while leaving your own existence alone. America does it all the *beep* time, they're just called wars. In a way, I have to admire Mickey and Mallory for at least not thinking they're great people like Gale, but really, they're all cogs in the same machine, and their philosophies and worldview are not in opposition to the society they're from, but reveling in it. And if you're like me and *beep* hate that society with all your heart, you can't find Mickey and Mallory Knox likable.

On a completely personal level, their constant PDA and lovefest just got on my nerves, but that happens with real life couples who aren't mass murderers either.

reply

Hi there, it's Reality again (yeah, I know (so soon?)).


Friend, it's a movie!

reply

[deleted]

The whole point of the movie was that the media turned them into celebrities. The media circus that seeks them out is even worse than they are, trivializing the violence they've committed for the sake of ratings. Hence, even though Mickey and Mallory are murderous psychopaths, they're likeable in a sense partly because they're not the worst people in the film, and partly because they're victims of the media themselves. They're anti-establishment, and the establishment is the bad guy.

reply

Jesus Christ. Out of all the vague threats I've heard over the Internet, you scare the living & breathing *beep* out of me. What the hell does "Normals" mean?!? You're acting like murderers deserve their own minorities rights group. And I don't think it counts as beating your demons if you have to do it just one more time. Coke addicts don't get just one more extra sniff on the house after rehab.

I once had a signature. But, then I realized how bleak & meaningless such personalizations are.

reply

Well, the fact that you wish death upon anyone who disagrees with you says a lot about why you sympathized with them.

I once had a signature. But, then I realized how bleak & meaningless such personalizations are.

reply

sort of victims of society like most killers.

That's where I stopped...

"America needs fewer laws, not more prisons" – James Bovard

reply

Yeah, WTF does that even mean?

reply

It is just a movie and movie killers are always more likeable than real life killers, M and M are villains just like Freddy Kruger, Mike Myers, Leatherface and everybody liked them didn't they. On the other hand real life killers are always more difficult to look at.

reply

[deleted]