Hmmm...


I am a big fan of the first movie and have found the biggest flaw about the second movie was that ML2 was made about 5 years after the original, but they tried to make it out to be the next year. People like Sheen and Berenger had obviously aged some, so it didn't look believeable.

Does anyone else think this film would have been better if they would have been more realistic about the timeline?

--
Jackie Fiest
Proud Ironside n00b

reply

You forgot to mention Willie Mays Hayes's complete transformation. Yeah you're right about it being better if they followed a more realistic timeline.

reply