MovieChat Forums > Hoop Dreams (1994) Discussion > Are the critics crazy, or am I??

Are the critics crazy, or am I??


**Warning, some spoilers below**

So I finally saw "Hoop Dreams" last night, and while I thought it was good, and sometimes even very good (I think I'd give it a respectable 7/10 on Imdb) I'm frankly astonished that this is the movie that Roger Ebert listed as the Best Movie of the 90s, and that was on more critics top 10 lists in 1994 than any other movie. I think my main problem was that I was unable to empathize with the characters quite as much as the filmmakers intended me to (or as much as many critics evidently did). But how could I, considering how maddeningly stupid the boys and their families could be throughout the film?? Now, I don't want to overstate things, and I realize that there was a lot of hardship and misery that the families could not avoid, but there were equal amounts of stupidity on display. Members of both boy's families repeatedly lost minimum wage jobs; no explanations were given for the majority of these losses, but it seems likely that given, for example, Arthur's father's crack problem and William's brother's attitude problem, they weren't good workers who were simply let go because of tough economic times. But this is glossed over, and instead we're treated to a minor rant from Arthur's mother about how the people in charge of welfare just "don't care." Now, I know it's not her fault that her husband was a crackhead moron, but I also can't help but be a bit skeptical that she couldn't keep a job because of "chronic back pain," considering the way she was able to move when Arthur scored in a basketball game.

And how about William's brother? Am I really supposed to sympathize with him? The guy had a promising basketball career and a college scholarship, but his attitude was so bad that he lost out on both, becomes a security guard, and then even loses that job, for unexplained (but surmisable) reasons, and sits at home without a job for months on end. Reading through some reviews, I get the impression that I'm supposed to view this guy as a tragic victim of the ghettoes, but as far as I can see (given the information we have from the movie) he has no one to blame but himself.

And as for the two leads, William and Arthur. Naturally you want to sympathize with the guys, but sometimes they just make it hard, especially Arthur. Was I the only one watching the movie who wanted to slap the guy upside the head, make him sit up straight, look his teachers in the eye, and pay attention in class? He seemed to have some good teachers (both at the Catholic school and the inner city school, the latter of which, incidentally, didn't seem to be the unsurmountable urban jungle of popular imagination) but the kid was so stupid and disruptive he barely graduated. If his education was as important as his mother claimed, why didn't she do what any responsible parent would do and threaten to take him off the basketball team if he didn't knuckle down in his studies?? William fares much better in this regard, and there's some indication that he has some degree of untapped academic potential. But really, how dumb do you have to be to take the ACT 5 times, including free special tutorial training sessions, and still only average a 17.5, which then has to be rounded up to an 18, the **bare minimum** needed to get a sports scholarship?? And then there are the maddening personal choices made by the boys, both fathering illegitamate children before the movie is over -- guess that Catholic education did William a lot of good. Anyways, being dumb and inarticulate (which both boys also are) does not make one a bad person, but it does make one a less interesting documentary subject.

I realize I've been harsh, but I'm not totally unsympathetic to the boys and their families. The way they were manipulated by the system was also maddening, and no one came out in a very good light. (Though, for all the reviewers who demonize the "system" on display in the movie, it also had its good side, such as Marquette honoring its commitment to let William keep his scholarship even after dropping out of the basketball team.) And I'm sure the life in inner city Chicago was not easy -- some of Arthur's idiocy can be excused by the actions of his father. (The scene where he sees his coked up dad on the basketball court was the most astonishing scene in the film for me.) But at the end of the day, in too many ways the boys and their families held themselves back too much for me to rank this as the masterpiece so many others found it to be.

reply



That was pointless


"I spit the truth and only the truth"

reply

No it wasn't; maybe I didn't make myself clear, but the points I mentioned above were so frustrating to me that it prevented me from appreciating the movie (and the families in the movie) as much as so many other people evidently did. So I'm wondering how other people were able to either ignore or justify these things that irritated me so.

reply

maybe u shud read the novel first...there they show u how these actions results from years of abuse and mistreatment from the cops (agee's dad) and be realistic...these black guys are not gonna give respect to thos e who dont give them none...tahst why williams bro turned down a contract from some university. and being a black family in one of the *beep* parts of the world, u really aren't given much chance of making it at all.

reply

I didn't realize there was a Hoop Dreams novel.

reply

that was honestly one of the dumbest post i have ever read. if you are african american you should be ashamed of yourself. "if you dont get no respect you dont give it". shut the heck up, quit making black people look like uneducated idiots by pulling that whole im brought down by the ghetto hogwash. the two boys in this movie were given a great chance to succeed and that was that, they blew it. as for the dad being mistreated by the cops, ask yourself how you would want to be treated walking down the street with a crackpipe. the idiot was doing it in front of kids playing basketball and you fault the cops for treating him like the piece of sh%t that he is. wake up buddy.

reply

i didnt mean when he bought it on the basketball court, i meant when he was a teenager before he has agee. u should read how the cops were after him.
"the two boys in this movie were given a great chance to succeed and that was that, they blew it. "...please...both william and arthur were given scholarships to st. joe's...but when agee's folks cant pay, they kicked him out and refused to release his transcripts...how is that his fault? how did he blew it?

reply

nov·el
noun.
A fictional prose narrative of considerable length, typically having a plot that is unfolded by the actions, speech, and thoughts of the characters.

reply

That is one of the most retarded posts I have ever read. Arthur's father's actions can not be blamed on treatment by police, the guy not only was a crack head, but also smacked around his wife and Arthur at points in his life. Are you just going to excuse everything he does because of other people? you can't do that... As for William's brother, pleae give me a break. William's brother got the opportunity that 99% of high school basketball players (black or white) do not get, which is the opportunity to play college basketball. Not getting respect? thats absolutally moronic, and an insult to black people to claim that that is the reason not only for his problems, but the problems of blacks in general. He was a kid that did not want to be coached, your not gonna get anywhere in ball like that... and oh, btw, 2 things, one you don't get a "contract" to play college basketball, its a letter of intent, and two, he did go to play college ball at UCF, but did not get much playing time because he was a headcase, and then left the school...

reply

The topic isn't the 'novel', but the movie. You want to comment on the novel, go to Amazon. Plenty of good (and bad) novels have made really poor movies. If a movie makes a viewer WANT to read the novel, then it has achieved a major accomplishement-especially in these days of watching instead of reading. This movie does not make a viewer want to read the 'novel'. Or does it entice many people to ask 'what are they doing now?'. It DOES make one wonder though...

reply

just to be clear...william, who graduated from marquette, lost his job and now working as a social service worker...at least that's what i've heard. Agee on the otehr hand now works as a accomplished public speaker and founder of the "hoop dreams" clothing line....i guess these boys did just fine huh?

reply

actually, Gates is now a minister and works with inner-city youth

reply

They did just fine because they were in a movie, not because of their talents, Agee is a guy who goes around the country talking about himself only with about the credentials of a third grader. Without this movie under his belt he would be on the streets. Dont even try to reply, its over.

reply

third grade credentials????r u a moron? u did see HOOP DREAMS rite? not smokin crack and daydreaming? u said in teh otehr post that i shouldnt be making fun of these black people,which im not, but here u were saying that without the movie they would end up on teh streets...how do u sleep at night?

reply

What Agee is doing isn't any different then what a lot of rich people do which is get opportunities based on family money/contacts and not their own credentials... I'm not excusing Agee, but lets be honest, what he's doing isn't any different then what our current president has done his whole life: He hasn't earned any of his positions, jobs, or money based on his own merits, but based on opportunities that his father got for him (through family money and connections)...

reply

Wow...that's the epitome of ignorant. Without this movie...well he DID have the movie. That's like saying the guy who wins the lottery wouldn't be rich without the ticket. No *beep* genius!

The idea that someone can parlay some fame (or infamy) into success is not new and certainly doesn't make the person who does it someone with 'the credentials of a third grader'. Jeez, Ralph Branca, the man who gave up Bobby Thompson's "Shot Heard Round The World" in 1951 actually made a living as a public speaker. And he's one of the biggest goats in sports history. So the idea that these young men have no talents is idiotic on only speaks to your ignorance. If anything, it shows that you really CAN achieve the American Dream when you take advantage of the opportunity given to you.

reply

did you happen to notice they are real people?

who cares if you like them or not.

are you saying you only like a movie if you like the characters?????

it provided a window into a culture mainstream america knows nothing about.

it was groundbreaking.

it was about race and class.

so much more informative than 99% of hollywood crap.



>> An armadillo could be a
better president than Bush. <<

reply

The critics are sane. You are crazy.

reply

I'll be glad to check out the book when I have time, and maybe it will explain more clearly than the movie just why the boys and their families acted the way they did. But I have to assume that the vast majority of people who saw and loved this movie have not read the book, and did not have any extra information than I did when they saw it. So maybe one of those people can explain to me what they saw in these people that I didn't, and how they were able to rationalize the idiocy I complained about in my original post. Just why am I crazy, pdmntpdl?

reply

You´re not crazy but a bit cold-hearted. A lot of republicans are, so they probably don´t appreciate this movie as much as I do...

reply

Don't mix in politics in the discussion, Carl I. Hagen.

Feel the blast from the chocolate bomber!

reply

where do i begin???

i'll bet you like the shawshank redemption because the characters are so smart and inspirational in times of hardship... that's fantasy land, a contrived fairy tail from begining to end. hoop dreams is reality, the reality of people as a product of their environment. do you think that they're just stupid people and that's all there is to it? of course it is frustrating. if you had four years of your life on video for everyone to watch the audience would shake their heads at stuff you've done, starting with that post you wrote.

reply

[deleted]

I totally agree with you. I don't know if anyone here will actually believe me or not, but Steve James is my father, and I recently went to Bo Agee's funeral. The "crackhead moron" that haverpopper referred to had turned his life completely around. He started his own church, went completely clean, and became a great dad to his children. He also sold clothes as a sort of street vendor to make some extra money for his family, but was shot and robbed a few months ago. I just wish that you could understand the pain and hopelessness that that family has to endure on a daily basis, and I hope that maybe you can step outside of your suburban apartment and just look around for a minute next time.

reply

havepopper you are ignorant and unsympathetic. You look for what's wrong in this documentary rather than whats good, and there's a lot good with this documentary. REPEAT, DOCUMENTARY!! real life situations, little to nothing scripted!! If I followed you with a camera in your real life situations achieving your goals or whatever, I'm sure we'd all find that you weren't a rocket scientist and that you are flawed like anybody. You must have been watching Homeboys in Outerspace instead of Hoop Dreams.

IMDBlack Man
What Now? I'ma tell you what now

reply

To the original poster, I agree with SOME of your comments regarding the people in Hoop Dreams, but i think u've got to realize that the stupidity and bad decisions of people represent what it's like living in the inner-city ghetto. This movie is a prime example of two kids trying to make it, but have all these problems in front of them. In Hoop Dreams you get a glimpse of what it's like living in these poor conditions and you see why these people do the things that they do. I think the producers hit it dead on and accomplished exactly what they wanted to do with this movie.

reply

I still need to see this.

reply

The best I can offer as per an explanation (I loved the film ftr. Grew up less than 15 miles away from their neighborhood) is that Gates' and Agee's actions come from the culture of poverty, which is rampant and quite evident throughout the movie.

reply

[deleted]

This movie shows that the biggest problem blacks have is their own culture

reply

[deleted]

?? I am not entirely sure what this comment means. I watched this movie with a friend of mine last night. The aspect of the movie that was most important to me was that it made me think about the situation the characters were in and the decisions they made. My friend said that he did not like the movie for similar reasons as the top level post. I pointed out that from our perspective it might be easy to make judgements about the characters' situation being far removed. I wondered what we ourselves would have done in similar situation. Eventhough at times I questioned some of the decisions and behavior, it also made me think about issues of race and poverty. I found it engrossing and very thought provoking. 8/10

reply

Hold on a second. Why is there mention of a novel on this board? The book
"Hoop Dreams" is not a novel, but just a book about the film. A novel is a fictional
narrative story, and "Hoop Dreams" was first a film and then a book about
the lives of Agee and Gates. Also, no one needs to read this book to appreciate
the film, it can stand on its own.

reply

[deleted]

That couldn't be more wrong, I'm a liberal. Why do you say that?

reply

No,dear, it's not black people's culture that is the problem---it was living in poverty and being trapped in a ghetto/dangerous environment that was their problem. Also keep in mind teenagers in poor inner city schools do NOT always have access to educational opportunities that kids in the suburbs have, due to lack of funding. What you said is bulls**t because I grew up with a lot of black folks who were determined that their kids get the best education possible,including my own mother,who really pushed education on me.. Don't sit there and make a condemning blanket statement about ALL black people just because you saw a movie about 2 young black boys in the ghetto. They don't represent ALL black people 'cause ALL of us do not live in the inner city, but the film was about THEIR struggles and realities that they had to deal with, merely because of where they lived. And even if they didn't make to the NBA, they still finished college and did something else positive with their lives--so that silly statement you made is ignorant and irrelevant.

reply

[deleted]

One of the scenes I found most powerful was when Arthur greets William after St. Joe's early exit from the state tournament, marking William's final high school game. They basically just cloister themselves away from the noise for a moment and embrace, tell one another they love each other, and quickly, and seemingly unsentimentally part ways. I thought that scene transcended even the issues of race and poverty in the movie. It was two young men who had, for years, nurtured a singular focus, and one has just had the mission come to an untimely end, while the other goes on, but, surely, not for long. I thought that scene was about the frustration of failing when there is only one acceptable goal. That is the kind of failure that feels complete. That was a scene of a young man who was growing up and away from his singular goal, and facing the prospect of a life that will require of him various things beyond the single skill that everything around him has pushed him to hone. I don't think it really matters if it's a basketball player in the city, or an eccentric mathematician trying to function, I think we can all understand that picture of utter frustration, and the need for a shoulder.

reply

Here's a idea.Get off your b"""" asses & go out & get a job. I'm tired of hearing about how bad they got by living in the city.They can only blame themselves.This is a bunch of crap.This is why are country is heading for another civil war. These people are so stupid.

reply

ok.. i may not have any right saying this as im a white female living in a nice neigborhood and my family is getting by pretty well, but i somewhat agree that these people could have maybe helped themselves a bit but i still think that they were also victims or circumstances and they were dealing with their lives the only way they felt they could. i admire these guys for trying their hardest to make something of their lives and not end up like their parents who have to struggle through life. Oh, and also, while our country is really stupid and im not at all a fan of it, i highly doubt that we are heading for another civil war

Alyssa Nicole <3

reply

Dude. You're an idiot.

reply

Im not racist but for gosh sakes, these two twerps earned everything they got. Agee left the school because he was a *beep* and the other guy who nobody knows had a very bad attitude. You want to blame both of their lost chances in life on living in the ghetto fine, but most educated people know why they were only afterthoughts in movie history. THEY WERE STUPID.

reply

[deleted]

If those kids were that stupid growing up in St. Joes, you bet your a#s they would have ended up the same. Quit trying to say these kids were screwed because of where they came from, the kids in the movie had no outstanding traits that made anyone like them except for basketball, and guess what, they were given a shot because of basketball. Everything that happens thereafter was the kids fault, Agee having horrible test scores, along with the other guy. they both had terrible attitudes and then they both have children at a young age. There are absolutely no excuses for these guys, they are where they are in life because that is how they played their cards. How many times in the movie did you see the two boys go to a study group to improve their grades? Not once. They expected everything handed to them and almost seemed shocked that everyone didnt kiss their asses all the time in the film. The original poster of this thread actually does have good points and does not in any way seem racist. If you think that is racist than I could say that any white kid that gets rejected from doing a rap label because he isnt from the ghetto is racist. GROW UP AND GET SERIOUS IN LIFE OR IT WILL PASS YOUR ASS BY. That is the point of this film.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

GOOD EXCUSES FOR THEIR POOR BEHAVIOR SAN-28. I CANT BELIEVE PEOPLE AS DUMB AS YOU GET ON THESE POSTS. ALL YOU DO IS MAKE EXCUSES FOR THE IDIOTS IN THE MOVIE. IM SURE THE CRACKHEAD FATHER CAME BACK TO HIS SON FOR LOVE AND NOT FOR THE FACT THAT RACIST SPIKE LEE GAVE HIM A PAYCHECK FOR RETURNING DURING THE MOVIE. GROW UP MAN. I SEE WHITE KIDS EVERYDAY THAT LIVE IN THE "GHETTO" GET UP AT SIX IN THE MORNING AND GO TO WORK AT MCDONALDS. THEY EARN THEIR MONEY FOR THEIR FAMILIES WITH NO EXCUSES AND DONT LEAN ON A WELFARE CHECK. YOUR SURROUNDINGS DO PLAY A ROLE IN YOUR LIFE BUT THE LOSERS MAKE THAT AN EXCUSE WHILE THE SMART PEOPLE GET A JOB. BYE. AND YES, I DID CALL SPIKE LEE A RACICT, I BELIEVE HE IS ONE.

reply

*beep* i can't make any excuses for you, you're just showing that you're an idiot. i'm pretty sure that "racict" isn't a word. and how can you call spike lee a "racict"? he's got two WHITE PEOPLE cast in starring roles in his upcoming film "inside man". and your point about people working at mcdonald's to support their family, i'm pretty sure a pay check from mcdonald's can sustain a family for an extended period of time. if that was the case, why don't we have mcdonald's and every other existing fast food chain just hire everyone living below the poverty line because they pay enough for someone to make a living and support a family. and didn't gates' mother graduate from nursing school? i'm pretty sure that becoming a nurse constitutes trying to make money to support a family. and if you know anything about those two guys now, gates pulls in about $40,000 a year. would you call making that amount of money on your own making excuses? i sure wouldn't.

reply

Your reply made absolutely no sense whatsoever. If you couldnt understand what I meant then you my friend are the idiot. And if Mrs Gates is making that much money for her family than I guesss the old *beep* cliche exscuse that they dont have anything and they come from a poor family is null then. you have actually just helped me build a better point, thank you. By the way moron, Spike Lee has wnet on camera saying that he doesnt trust white people and can live pretty much without them, what does that mean to you?

reply

How about condom use. Why are these people having so many kids if they can not afford the. The fact that Agee has 4 kids to 4 different women and Gates has 4 is irresponsible. People keep popping out kids and not being able to afford them. It simple use a condom. Then they might not have to rely on welfare. If you don't have 4 kids it alot easier to improve yourself.

reply

[deleted]

I know more white people on some type of welfare than black people. If you look at the data more than 40% of white people are on welfare in the US. Let's say that's 40%. That's almost 79 million white people on welfare. 25% of blacks are on welfare. There are about 38 million blacks in the US so that's 9.5 million black people on welfare. Also, you should know 74% of all those on welfare have jobs. So 26% don't have jobs and based on what you're saying is: most those people must be black, right? Statistically speaking: that'd be wrong to assert.

-Nam

I am on the road less traveled...

reply

Most educated people don't usually grow up in places like they did. Most low income areas have low income schools and I actually went to an elementary school that was low income (a 99% white farming area school) and our school books were from the 60s and early 70s and I went to elementary in the 80s. None of that poor education changed until I got to high school the next city over in a mainly black area. And while that high school had its own tribulations those of us from low income schools weren't as educated as those from higher income schools. So, you take a low income school student and put him into a private school that is obviously of higher income, the lower income (unless a genius) student isn't most likely to fair well. I have Dyscalculia (math dyslexia) and in my low income elementary school and Junior High/Middle School they had no idea what that was so every time I failed at math it was because "I wasn't trying hard enough". They knew I was smart because I scored high in other subjects but I failed math every single time. So, since they just thought I wasn't "trying hard enough" they took me out of the classes I was excelling at and put me in a class for unruly students and I was branded a "bad student". They gave me the thought of, "If they don't care why should I care?". I didn't find out I had Dyscalculia until I was 30 years old.

I'm not saying these two people in the documentary had learning disabilities but it did state, I believe, Gates could barely read. He could have had dyslexia in reading and low income schools probably wouldn't notice a thing like that because they don't have that knowledge of what it is. So, if Gates had dyslexia then being put into a high income school or given a certain test such as he had to take, it could damper his ability to know exactly what he's trying to answer.

That's one of the main problems with low income schools: students could have certain learning disabilities and either the school doesn't know, or they do know but they don't have the necessary funding to help those students with those disabilities and those students get brushed to the wayside in life. So, if they have dreams (like I did) they get discarded.

Just sayin'...

-Nam


I am on the road less traveled...

reply

[deleted]

All these republicans coming on this board and criticizing the critics with remarks that really show their stupidity should just go back to watching boring biopics of rags-to-riches industrialists/celebrities. This film is real. It shows two inner-city black kids and all the social problems around them just hoping to succeed in their dreams to become pro-basketball players. It is amazingly heartening to watch their progress through the years with all that exists around them. I don't think the film tries to explain certain events because it treats them as the "normal goings on" in their environment. If they wanted to, they could make a whole movie about drugs, unemployment, teenage pregnancy, etc. in the ghetto to satiate your apparent complaints.

Trust me, collecting welfare doesn't make you a stupid, lazy, useless individual in society. You see the mother going through nursing school, supporting her sister and kid and her son's best friend for some time (in addition to her own 3 kids), with something like $370/month of welfare money. Even back in the early nineties, that aint much man. You have the balls to call this woman stupid and lazy and cheating the gov't of $370/month?????? Don't forget Arthur and William both get a summer job when they have the time from their team, school, etc. in the summer -- I don't know if you know but you can't really work most places when ur under 16. And you can't blame them for using some of it for themselves -- they're teenagers. William is amazingly matured for his age with all he goes through -- he's got all the pressure of the successes and failure of the team on him, he's got a kid at home to deal with, he's got a brother who is putting all his hope and dreams into him, he's got a father who only starts seeing him for his potential fame, he's got college recruiters coming at him from all angles to recuit him, his grades at skool. With all that, and his academic shortcomings (which have A LOT to do with his upbringing and his grammar school education in some poor schools), he is able to persevere and get to where no one in his family has managed to go.

Just these blatantly moronic thoughts about how these people are stupid and useless people in society makes me shocked at how many people are so ignorant about the culture of poverty. These are probably the same people that don't feel like their natural-born status had anything to do with how intelligent or wealthy they are today. These kids don't exactly have encyclopedias in their house to read from. And their peers around them arent exactly going to law school and corporate jobs after they graduate. They're lucky to be alive at the age of 18, 19 with kids on the street getting killed or on drugs or in jail.

You don't have to accept the harsh realities of the film telling it like it is about poor people -- maybe you just dont want to accept that america (like every other industrialized nation) has inequality in rich and poor which are built into the economic system making it much more difficult to move up when you're in that state. But you can't argue these two kids are good kids using their talents wisely to try and make their lives better -- and their families supporting them as much as possible in their endeavors. It's amazing humanity through and through which you can't get from a normal fictional film or even hard-nosed documentary. The story is brilliantly told by the camera.

reply

You are still using the background as an exscuse for their failures. Spike Lee is a good director and makes decent film and yes this was a true film on these kids, but they still werent very competent when it came to the real world. All they ever did was make exscuses for their troubles.

reply

Name me one time when William made an excuse for his troubles...

reply

His laziness after his high school years were over is a good enough excuse for me. It seemed as though he wanted things to be done for him instead of him achieving them himself. Prove to me one thing he acomplished after he got done with school besides wasting a golden opportunity with free tuition to that college. Would you like me to take a whole page on Arthur next?

reply

Laziness after his high school years? The full story, now more than 10 years later, is William went back to college and finished his degree. Also, after a few years out of the college game, Michael Jordan asked William to practice with the Washington Wizards in the offseason before his comeback. Willaim played well enough that Jordan and the coaching staff promised him a try-out. Unfortunately for William, a few days before the try-outs were to begin, he broke his ankle. But even after coming that close to his dream, he didn't cry about it and make excuses; he became a pastor, supports his family and has even reconciled with Coach Pingatore, who now regularly has William speak at his summer camp, where William also happens to send his kids. In fact, William has since said that he plans for his children to attend St. Joe's.

reply

I dont know if we should all think you are a loser for knowing this info or not, but also who really gives a *beep* Ill bet MJ has never spoken a word to him and if he has it was only becase he was in a movie, he is definetely not good enough to play in the NBA nor ever will be. It is kind of nice to know the guy is a pastor, good for him.

reply

lol panda goalie is the typical conservative who complains about poor black people for being poor while he's already inhereted enough money from his family to pay for the rest of the black family's life

reply

Can we cut all this stupid crap about the guy being an evil conservative? Christ, the man has an opinion, and we turn it into a political debate.

As for his argument...yeah, it's a little flawed, but I'm appalled that everyone has basically thrown it under the bus. Most of the people one these message boards do that...if someone disagrees with them, they throw a fit and insult the person.

Whatever. I don't even care that much.

On the plus side, it was an awesome effing movie.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Hate to say it, but I'm not a loser, just a guy who watched the new "Hoop Dreams" Criterion Collection edition, with the full length audio commentary of Arthur and William, which was recorded in 2005. They're both in their early thirties and doing fine. Also, William probably was good enough to play in the NBA. A bunch of guys, like Chris Webber, Jalen Rose, Michael Finley, etc... were at about the same level as William at the end of their high school careers, so I'm not sure why you would think he was definitely not good enough. There is more than a little luck involved in making it to the NBA, his chances might have been hurt by being undersized, by injury, by other types of bad luck, or maybe he just wasn't good enough, honestly, neither I or you really knows. What I was happy to hear from the commentary was William saying he was content with his experiences with the Wizards, even though it ended with him being injured. The reason for this was, in the practices he more than held his own with seasoned NBA players. Basically, he proved to himself that he was good enough, which he said allowed him to close the basketball chapter of his life with no regrets.

reply

Okay, I was a little off by calling you a loser, but I really do hate these goofs coming on this message board saying I am a conservative just because I am white and thought they were a little lazy in high school. It has always got to be politically motivated when someone doesnt kiss these guys asses. Its nice to hear they are doing well now but I honestly didnt think the two boys had the heart to make it after the original film, I am man enough to admit I might have made a mistake. I still think Agee is really dumb though.

reply

"All these republicans coming on this board and criticizing the critics with remarks that really show their stupidity"

You don't know what political party, if any, these posters support, so drop the stereotyping.

reply

[deleted]