Porn Mag??


During the Parade scene, they scare some kids that are giggling over a porn mag. When they drop it and run off, the pages flap open, revealing the images of 3 naked women. And you can see EVERYTHING! Breasts and vaginas! (though the later isnt explicity animated) I swear the first is a dead ringer for Jessica Rabbit too!

Not that I'm a prude or offended by this mind you, but I'm surprised this made it past the censors that usually stamp out anything that might "warp" the "fragile" minds of the kiddies.

reply

[deleted]

I thought all Studio Ghibli movies were made to be enjoyed by children as well as adults? o,o

reply

They are. It's probably a cultural difference. Didn't you notice the Tanuki's testicles showing constantly?

reply

[deleted]

Yes...Japanese are very open-minded when it comes to their bodies. Especially traditional.
It's a wonderful thing actually. There is no reason to hide body parts from children anyway. Violence should be banned. Not nuudity.

reply

what about when they mix?... sorry, that was terribly inappropriate and I couldn't help myself. but I agree, sexuallity is and will be a part of life eventually and though I wouldn't talk about birds and bees with a little kid I do think if parents didn't make a big deal out of nudity in front of their kids the kids would be better off. I mean they're learning to be comfortable with the human form and its not like nudity means dirty. I mean if there were actual sex scenes then I'd say ok thats to far but nudity is fine by me... proud parent of 0 (but I'm a child psych major so I know a little at least.

reply

It was a funny moment but I was really surprised that the movie only got PG with a scene like that. If it was a live action movie an R would have been put on it immediately. With that said I wasn't all that offended by it, only surprised by the rating. I think it deserved a PG-13

PS Did Disney release this in the US? Because it's strange how they're hesitant about releasing the (IMO) tamer Only Yesterday and didn't have much problems with this.

Vision... Creation... Newsun!

reply

It does show 3 kids reading an erotic mag (or porn, depending on your standard) with 4 pin-ups visible, naked top and bottom.
And even more, the 2 tanukis in disguise stare at it and catch it before it falls.
It is fast but it is there.

As said, it is not a kiddie movie.
And yes, it felt strange to me too, because it makes the intended audience a bit unclear.
(On a side note, you might want to look up what "vagina" is)

True also the first one (and others somewhat too) looks like Jessica R
rabbit, but it is not resembling enough for a clear reference.

reply

A responsible parent would have watched the film in advance and read the reviews so their kids would never have seen that bit in the first place. If you choose to let your kids watch just any old DVD then there's nobody else to blame for their minds being warped.



English Language Anime: Dub it, don't pervert it.

reply

I find it amusing that in all the things in the parade scene, the one thing you think will warp the kids mind is seeing an indistinct image of a nude in a magazine thats on screen for less than a second.

Did I say amusing? I meant to say sad.

reply

warped from seeing a naked woman, lol. but anyway, i have seen this movie about 10 times and missed this every time. I guess the censors did too ^_^

“In my sentences I go where no man has gone before.”
- George W. Bush

reply

I was more surprised when the Tanuki, after finding out that someone took credit for their parade, were lying on the floor and in the corner one female Tanuki showed full nipples and breasts.

THAT was bit too much.

reply

and lying below that Tanuki was a male with a huge patch of pubes above his balls... lol

reply

lol saw them both too

reply

Tell me, where you live, do small furry animals who live in the woods wear clothes?

reply

No, but raccoons don't have human tits either.

reply

It was a degenerate scene. In fact, the whole move was pretty much unsuited for kids. But fan boys will find a way to justify anything in their little warped minds, including nudity AND violence, which this film has aplenty. Its pretty disgusting really.

reply

In fact, the whole move[sic] was pretty much unsuited for kids.


Got it in one. This is not a children's film - why did you think it was?

reply

[deleted]

It's definitely a children's film. Back when I was a kid, I would have loved it.

reply

Oh sure, it's fine for children to see people killed by having their trucks forced off the road, dying in explosions and fires, to see people terrified by ghosts and demons, to see the natural world devastated on a colossal scale; just make sure they don't see any image, however fleeting and stylised, of an unclothed human body.

reply

Most of what you described can be seen on the news all the time. And I don't think children would find any part of this film traumatizing. If they can't handle seeing people getting spooked by ghosts, then Scooby Doo should also be banned, I guess. And I don't understand if that last remark was directed to me, because I don't think that 3 seconds worth of barely noticable naked people are even slightly bad for a kid to see.

reply

No, not you, mevmijaumau - this whole thread was started by someone letching over seeing the porn images - probably one of those young boys who find it very exciting to say or write the word 'vagina', bless them.

I used to protect my young children from the news. As you say, horrifying images and stories of true events, about which they can do nothing; I preferred them not to be exposed to such things. I remember on one occasion staying with my in-laws when my daughter was about three, and there had been a terrible fire in an aircraft on the tarmac at Manchester airport, many dead, including children. My father-in-law was very deaf, and insisted on watching every news bulletin, so three times a day my little girl and I had to go for rather unnecessary walks to the park, while the huge voice boomed with BBC clarity all over the house about how several children and their mothers had burned to death... I didn't want her hearing that.

Anime is not necessarily for children - I think people tend to equate it with 'cartoons', quite mistakenly.

reply

I think the news are the most distressing when you're an adult, definitely. Interestingly enough, the TV in our household was always turned on and I was always exposed to news, but it never really bothered me because I couldn't grasp most of it, whereas now I don't watch the news anymore because it's too much negativity for me. I think it's the same for Pom Poko, in fact I think the worst part of the film for a child would be the depressing ending for the raccoon dogs.

I agree that nudity in itself in films isn't harmful to children. When I was a kid, there was a mischievous boy in our kindergarten who'd sometimes flash his penis to girls in order to startle them. Nobody was traumatized because of that, or because of seeing naked people on TV. Apparently, nudity is a synonym to sex to many people.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]