MovieChat Forums > Color of Night (1994) Discussion > Bruce WIllis and his small Shlong - Did ...

Bruce WIllis and his small Shlong - Did it put you off Die Hard ?


The sight of Bruce Willis having such a small penis in this movie has made me now realise that John Mclane is actually not the super cool action hero I thought he was. If he can have surgery to make his weener bigger then I will respect him more... Why did this film have to ruin the Die Hard saga for me, such a shame...

All super heros should have big weeners, it's a simple rule.



reply

[deleted]

1. we live in an age where color, homosexuality etc shouldnt matter as they are not chosen by us.. so why would having a small penis or boobs be labelled as faults? it is out of his control so surely you cant blame him anymore than you can blame a black or asian person for being black/brown?

2. Since when does the size of penis define how cool a person is? it may have mattered if: YOU were going to sleep with the person but since you won't then lay off..

--
http://quality-cards.co.uk/
http://www.tvshow-caps.co.uk/

reply

2. Since when does the size of penis define how cool a person is? it may have mattered if: YOU were going to sleep with the person but since you won't then lay off..


reply

Let me guess, you've never seen a flaccid penis before.
It can literally vary inches depending on the conditions around it :)

Until you've seen a penis fully erect, you have no right to judge it's size.

reply

[deleted]

I find it odd that people, mostly men it seems, comment about the size of the man's penis under water. I don't know if it is actually Bruce Willis or a stand in but it just seems odd to me.
I shower with men every single day at the gym in a communal shower room and most of the men are the same size, very similar to what I see in this scene and no one thinks a thing of it. Very few men are huge. Very few!
I think men find it comforting that Bruce isn't huge. If he was, especially in this scene, I don't think men would comment on it as much.

reply

I'm guessing you guys didn't see this movie on the big screen. To try to get the same effect on your tv screen, adjust the image to "super stretch". That'll give you an idea of Bruce's awesomeness. Too bad they weren't making movies in 3-d when this flick came out.

reply

I think that sunznc is right.

Bruce Willis is average compared to most men with clothes on. However, he's small compared to the kind of guy who takes off his clothes in front of the camera. This is why people are confused. They're comparing Bruce Willis to the porn actors, not the everyman.

Like sunznc, I've seen a lot of naked men in person, and Bruce Willis is very much like that.

Most guys who take off their clothes for the camera realize that they are above-average to huge, and then they start off at least partially hard before you see it in high temperatures. There's a bunch of tricks to the trade.

Bruce Willis should be commended, not demonized. I respect him even more now for keepin' it real!



☕Death before decaf.☕

reply


Maybe I'm just not that fussy, but his privates looked fine to me. Bruce looked hot in this film.


"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]