Why was this banned?
I just saw this movie last night for the frist time. I frist heard about this movie a while ago on the salo board and I was interested in seeing it due to its supposed graphic nature.Now I know this proboly the wrong reason to see a movie but I usally enjoy dark graphic movies with uneasy subject matter(in glass cage,I stand alone,Irreversable).Anyway after watching this movie last night I came away a bad tase in my mouth I thought overall that the acting was pretty good,however I think that the plot and the(spoller?)killer's motive was a little weak.but what really suprised me was the fact that I did'nt really find the movie shocking in the least I don't know maybe I am just desenseitized to everything but what was really shocking about this film? I know he was being tourtured but you never really see anything that brutal or distugting she makes him(Spoller) piss himself,cuts his hand and drops a little blood on his hand,Anally rapes him(that one's is the worst IMHO),sticks his hand into a microwave and drop maggots on his wounded head and finally proforms sugery on him(that's pretty tame you don't really see anything)and cuts his neck.I know that these are all terrible things but I think I was excepting more I know they had a very limited buget so shooting a lot of gore was most likely out of the question.But in the end I think that if the movie overall had been better I would'nt be coplaning about the lack of gore. but why was it banned I seen more violence on cable tv
out
"Intolerance is evidence of impotence" Aleister Crowley