underrated
5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a good for it.
share5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a good for it.
shareapparently there's a lot of hate for this film. I personally, have always enjoyed this film ever since I was a child. It was easy to follow, with just enough action and just enough comedy to keep me entertained. I still enjoy this movie as an adult and I have yet to see beverly hills cop 1 & 2.
shareYep, that's the problem...it was easy to follow, and just enough comedy....for a child.
Pretty stunning that after all these years you've seen this turd multiple times and never the original, which was comedy and action GOLD.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?
I'm so sorry if I offended you by stating that I enjoy this movie. It's just an opinion. BTW I have watched the other 2 since... they were ok. Funny, but not anymore than the 3rd. (To me)
shareNo. This move deserves a lower rating. It tries to hard to be funny and the new"replacement" characters aren't needed.
shareI'm surprised there's such a huge difference in opinion over the movies. I watched them all for the first time this week and I thought they were all good. Not great, but good. I don't see what makes the 3rd one so much worse. Yeah, I missed Taggart but I thought the setting was pretty cool.
The setting is one of the most unique in all movies I have seen. This one is just pure fun and does not take its self too seriously. I will watch this anyway over the the 2nd movie, especially.
Herbert West: Who's going to believe a talking head? Get a job in a sideshow.