MovieChat Forums > Above Suspicion (1995) Discussion > Javier M. Hernandez_Boom Operator...

Javier M. Hernandez_Boom Operator...


... needs to get better at holding that boom pole. I saw the boom mic dip down into the top of the screen at LEAST 3 times, maybe at the most 5 times, throughout the entire film.
You'd think the EDITOR and DIRECTOR as well would know better than to use a shot where the boom mic gets in the screen space. Directors - by the way - alert the EDITOR if this does happen even for a second. Production Managers/Script Supervisors - who ever is doing the shot logs - NOTE that the boom got in the shot and at around what time, line, or action in the shot. Because then the EDITOR is going to have to avoid that time in the shot, to cut to a cutaway shot, and then back to whatever shot was ruined by boom operators like Mr. Hernandez here!!

:) but i did like the movie - mostly the acting and plot... hardly anything else... the shots were typical, despite the set of their house being awesomely beautiful... the framing of the shots at times were also kind of blah... the sound came out well despite being able to SEE the boom mic... music was all right... editing was ok despite them not editing out the bad snippits in the shots....
oh well - guess hollywood movies can't be ALL professional. ;)

love,
a fellow audio/video production person
Kristy "Kat"



"That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard" (req. line 4 the recent 48hr film challenge regionally)

reply

Why blame the boom for the editing? Are we to assume this doesn't happen in many movies? In fact, maybe the director should be blamed. Maybe, the editor saw the boom dip and didn't have any other clips to splice in because the director had few alternatives.

Let's string them all up. All of them. This was an oscar winner, I tell you! A Golden Globe waiting to happen!

Oh. Wait. It wasn't?

Never mind.

Screw the boom.



The gene pool could use a little chlorine......

reply

expensivewino13-
you obviously didn't read the rest of my rant about who was to blame... did you?

Ah, i see. you don't care.
well neither do i. to me, they're all to blame. he needs to hold the boom without it getting in the shot, the director needs to see that that had happened & have the shot redone (if it's the Wide or even the cover-shots, regardless - RESHOOT). the editor is hardly ever to blame, because on the set the production manager logs which shot was best, and which ones were bad & why.... so the editor usually goes by the shot logs.... so the Prod. Man. & camera op also may have been 2 people to have seen the boom dip into the shot as well. as a camera op myself, i tend to notice those things, b/c the boom op usually co-operates w/ me on "where's my *room*?" on how low they can go with the mic.

yeahhhhh. just sayin'. Oscar winner, or not, it does call itself a professional movie and well... camera operator shadows in ALASKA, reflections of the camera op & director in SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE, booms dipping into the shot in *this* movie.... happens all the time... doesn't mean it SHOULD, dude.. really lol just a pet peeve of mine to see simple mistakes like that happen, when it's just placement of camera, lights, & "room" that no one checked on, on a lot of people's behalf. :/



http://www.unofficialbenhellerfansite.com/bhhome.html

reply

I'm just kidding.

The gene pool could use a little chlorine......

reply

lol ur post cracks me up


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKAb-VOit0Q

reply