MovieChat Forums > The Secret World of Alex Mack (1994) Discussion > Question about Dr. Reeves (Hunter's fath...

Question about Dr. Reeves (Hunter's father)


Did Danielle Atron had something to do with the dissapearence of Dr. Reeves? and if so, what did she do? did she killed him or did he just ran away? or what happened?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I'm bumping this topic because I came here looking for the answer to that as well.

reply

From what I can imply, Dr. Reeves "disappeared" not long after he threatened to expose Danielle. I think it's safe to say that Paradise Valley's "benevolent" CEO saw to his demise.

reply

[deleted]

it's implied that Danielle had one of her security people get rid of him, although she might've done it herself. If he died from a drowning on a fishing trip, maybe she went with him and then pushed him off the boat or something? Or maybe she sent one of her security people with him on the trip to murder him and use "fishing trip" as a cover story for what really happened? Or maybe Reeves just ran away to Alaska or France or something to hide. 😕

Canada, eh? 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 :)

"The 21st century is all flash but no substance." ~ Smog City

reply

Danielle most certainly had him killed. If you know anything about Danielle's character you know that she always maintains plausible deniability, like when she told Vince "I know nothing about this kid" or when Vince tells her his plan she goes "what plan" or when she constantly says "I don't want to know about this." The idea that Danielle would actually hunt Dr. Reeves down herself and kill him is preposterous, she defintely had Vince kill him or someone else (but probably Vince).

He just ran away to Alaska? Why exactly would they even introduce the Hunter character and give him this backstory about his father if it wasn't somehow tied into the central plot? Come on man that's just stupid.

"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine

reply

The Alaska thing was sarcasm, and I agree with you anyway, Danielle had numerous researchers killed off in 1978 according to the BMX episode, likely at Vince's hands, so Hunter's father I doubt would be any exception.

Canada, eh? 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 :)

"The 21st century is all flash but no substance." ~ Smog City

reply

Oh OK my bad, thought you were being serious LOL.

But yeah it's definitely implied that Danielle had Dr. Reeves killed. Funny thing is when I was watching the first season as a kid I thought Danielle was just rude and bossy, then I didn't watch it for a while but then caught the final episode and I was like "wait, she's actually willing to kill people? Where did that come from?"

"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine

reply

Same here, I never picked up on her wanting to kill anyone until the last episode when I was a kid. Going back and watching it now though, there are subtle lines she says even in the first season, like in the Shock Value episode she sees Dave talking to a fake plant so she asks Vince "explain to me one more time why this man is necessary" and such. I don't know if she was just considering having Dave fired or if she wanted to have Vince kill Dave back at that point, but there's something 'off' with her through the entire series, like she's a sociopath or something. She's got no loyalty to anyone including her own family, no real friends, and she can fake emotion, and she has no problem with willing to drag her employees and the GC161 kid down in order to make money.

Canada, eh? 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 :)

"The 21st century is all flash but no substance." ~ Smog City

reply

In the Mack TV episode Vince also makes an allusion to the fact that they may very well kill Dave after they find the kid. However that never happens, after Danielle fires Vince she decides that Dave is worthless but instead of killing him she demotes him back to truck driver and keeps him at the plant so she can "keep an eye on him". I guess since it was technically a family show they didn't have a plot line where Danielle tries to have Dave killed, maybe she realized that no one would ever listen to Dave and he didn't have any actual proof so it wasn't worth the risk.

I feel like if this show was rebooted it could be a really good thriller/drama directed towards teenagers/adults. The way it is right now it seems to want to have it both ways, plot lines that are more geared towards older audiences (like Danielle having a guy drugged to get his FDA approval, yeah I don't know how Nickalodeon got away with that) and other ridiculous plot lines directed towards children (like will Scott ask Alex to the dance, or Robyn's hampster dying or Alex realizing that the donut shop lady should use the plates that cost more money but don't cause as much pollution (an episode I absolutely despise by the way)).

"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine

reply

I agree. While some of Alex's adventures are interesting, a lot of the episodes geared specifically towards her without a side-plot going on at the chemical plant, are just cutesy preteen-geared fluff. It makes sense considering that it's a children's show, but the characters who work at the chemical plant always seem to be more intriguing. I think there were a lot of subtle things mentioned that could've been explained further or been more centralized in the show, like the full backstories of Vince and Danielle and Dave and such, and less of Alex's Day-Glo type world where the biggest thing she has to worry about is an upcoming math quiz or a boy she likes not liking her back. I've always wondered about what would motivate Vince to become more or less a hitman under the guise of a security guard, and I understand money motivating Danielle's corruption, but what drives her to be so cruel to everyone around her? In 'The Secret' when Alex goes into the house rumored to be the place where a crazy woman locked her child up in the basement and refused to let her outside, and then it says Atron on the mailbox at the end and Alex finds out that there was a girl who lived there who ran away to school and all that, I had a lot of questions. I think there's more to Dave than meets the eye too, that he might've known a lot more about the illegal research than he let on, and although his role as the town's village idiot is comedic, it was interesting how he became a more serious character in the fourth season. Apparently Ken Lipman had plans to reboot Alex Mack as a film where Alex is an adult and has kids of her own, but many of the show's actors have either moved on to other roles or have quit acting altogether. Natanya Ross (Robyn Russo) has disappeared from acting for the most part and Louan Gideon (Danielle Atron) died back in 2014. I haven't heard much about Annie Mack's actor in a long time, either. Maybe if they hired new actors they could just remake it? I mean, the majority of viewers today of Alex Mack are nostalgic adults instead of little kids, so it could do a lot better remade for adults. I could also see sort of an Alex Mack the Next Generation bringing in more viewers, but I think in a digital age, a remade Alex Mack geared towards younger kids would probably just turn into Alex and her friends sitting around taking selfies and stuff. :-\

I never liked the paper plate episode either, it was too weird for me. The talking donut, the hippie woman, Alex being buried in garbage while an audio track of hippies humming is played in the background, eco-nut protestors at a small town donut shop, it was just too strange. Again, I thought that the sub-plot with the GC161 test family at the plant was interesting but the rest of the episode was just ridiculous. 😲

Canada, eh? 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 :)

"The 21st century is all flash but no substance." ~ Smog City

reply