East coast bias


It was really all about yankees-red sox, giants-dodgers. Did they realize that things went on in baseball between then east and west coasts? Oh yeah thats right the east coast media considers us lower class.

reply

It sounds to me like you may have only seen one of the episodes--the one about the 50's, a decade that was completely dominated by New York teams. The series does actually address the expansion of major league baseball to the west coast, but since this didn't begin until the late 50s and 60s, the early part of the series has little to do with the west coast. Its not a media bias. Thats just the way it is.

...and do me a favor, Fink:
throw it hard!

reply

A great league developed on the West Coast called the Pacific Coast League, it was one of the premier leagues in the country during the early 20th Century. This documentary did not address that at all. There is more to baseball than just the American and National Leagues.

reply

Dude the PCL is a minor league team. They also have a great little league program in my home town (in california by the way) They take their sports much more seriously on the least coast. We have good looking girls, etc. on the best coast.

reply

Have to disagree with your assessment. The PCL is currently a minor league, but before west coast expansion it was competitor to MLB. They did steal players away from MLB, mainly due to location but sometimes they would even match salaries. A lot of player preferred living and playing in California to being out east.

reply

They didn't talk about the Continental league either. And as an Edmontonian, I know all about the PCL, but really, the documentary wasn't east-coast-centric so much as it was MLB-centric.

Honestly, they only spent about thirty seconds talking about the DH, so yes, there was a lot of stuff they didn't really mention that I wish they had, but at the same time, at 22 hours, I think they were pretty comprehensive.

reply

Jesus, relax. Stop this pity party already. Oh boo hoo they don't like us on the west coast. Where did baseball originate? Where were the early dominate teams? When did baseball on the west coast begin and how long was it until the first dominate teams out west began to crop up? Be a smart human and think before you type.

reply

Actually baseball originated in England. Ever heard of rounders and cricket? Oh and by the way the St.Louis Cardinals just won their 10th World Championship! :-) The most of any other National League team and the only other team besides the yankees to have World Series titles in double digits. Even back in 1982 when they won their 9th World Championship they had the most of any National League team. HAHA!

reply

I agree that there is a east coast bias, but I still love this Documentary.

reply

The St. Louis Cardinals were the westernmost team for decades; thus their huge fan following to the west and south of them, territorially speaking. The Dodgers and Giants left the hated New York (by some, apparently) for the west coast, where previously had existed only minor-league teams. For a long while, New York had been supporting THREE Major League teams: the Yankees, Dodgers, and Giants! The reasons the Dodgers and Giants LEFT New York for the west coast in 1958 are in Ken's documentary. History should be LEARNED, not re-visioned! As far as east coast, or New York-hating goes, I'll be the FIRST in line to say: "I HATE THE YANKEES!" Being a Cleveland Indians fan, almost every season in the 50's (except "54) the Indians were in second-place...right behind the Yanks. At least they took the pennant away from them in '54, and in style, winning a RECORD 111 games, against only 43 losses! Then, being a Dodger fan, you also have to hate the Yankees- every time the Dodgers made it to the World Series, there were the cross-town rival Yanks, who managed to win all of their Series against "Da Bums", except one- 1955. Then after they moved to L.A., in '77 and '78, there were the Yankees, again beating them in the World Series. Revenge was sweet in '81, when the Dodgers sent the Yanks to the showers! How anyone could stomach George I-can-buy-anything-or-anyone Steinbrenner, Billy I'll-kick-dirt-on-you-while-I-have-my-tempertantrum Martin, and Reggie EGOMANIAC Jackson for "heroes", I'll never understand...(perhaps the "winning is the only thing that counts" gang...) Ringling Brothers must have envied THAT act! On the other hand, certain individual Yankee players MUST be respected for their individual accomplishments- the Babe, Joe, Roger, Yogi; but "I STILL hate the Yankees"! By the way, some current Major League teams were playing organized professional baseball BEFORE the shoot-out at the O.K. Corral in 1881 !!! It would be hard to imagine going from Tombstone to Phoenix to watch a ballgame after the gunfight! P.S. Reggie Hotdog Jackson holds ONE record I'm proud of him for: he's STRUCK-OUT MORE TIMES than ANY OTHER HITTER in the HISTORY of baseball. "Hey Reggie- Take off that cap and put on some mustard!" (An actual comment hurled at him from the rightfield stands at Cleveland Municipal Stadium, circa 1977-1981, from a fan, an African-American no less, who obviously was not going to be taken in by the "bribe"- Reggie would get unmercilessly boo'd by the fans at every plate appearance, a phenomenon not uncommon at other towns the Yankees visited)...This particular evening, it was announced over the P.A., that "Reggie Bars" were being passed-out, to all fans in attendance, courtesy of Reggie Jackson, as a way of introducing us to these new candybars. Well, WE weren't going to be swayed over to the enemy camp THAT easily- who did he think we were. a bunch of Benedict Arnolds?!? So, we ATE the candybars- they weren't too bad, actually...HOWEVER, we BOO'd him even MORE vociferously upon each new at-bat, RECOGNIZING his attempt to "buy us out", or perhaps just a blatant advertising campaign for his new business attempt! His other unfortunate response from the agitated crowd was in direct response to a PARTICULARLY awful plate appearance, with Reggie SCREWING HIMSELF INTO THE GROUND on THREE consecutive pitches, apparently attempting to hit EACH pitch into Lake Erie, or perhaps he was aiming for New York! Obviously, he struckout- again! And upon his return to right field, we gave him a STANDING OVATION! His response was to turn around and glare at us, prompting the pelting of Reggie with hotdogs...NOT the buns, ONLY the WEINIES!! This, too, prompted even more glares from Mr. SuperEGO! To my recollection, no profanities were ever directed toward him, and NONE of the weinies actually hit him...but his rightfield position was FILLED with bunless weinies the remainder of the game...HAD to be amusing to any TV audience viewing the game that evening. Ahhh, memories. And YES, the Indians drubbed the Yanks that night- unfortunately, that didn't happen too often back then. I relate this story because I WAS THERE! Several things you see DON'T make the record books OR the documentaries. (Especially when you're in a non-contending team's town, averaging around 5-8,000 fans a game, and are usually ignored by the mass media!) Did you ever hear the one about Sudden Sam McDowell sliding spikes-high into Gene Michael at 2nd Base, at an Indians game in the 60's, touching off a rhubarb? Yes, I was there for THAT one, too! Also the infamous Beer-Night "riot"...saw Yaz's last career homer- and Nolan Ryan's last shutout...they weren't Indians, but we were on our feet, giving 'em a standing "O"...we appreciated their efforts...unlike Mr. Hotdog! Er, uh ReggieBar.. Good Night.

reply

BRAVO!!! That's one of the best rants I have read in a long time.

GO CUBS!!!!






Ha ha ha ha! You just said "nuclear". It's "nukular", dummy, the "s" is silent!

reply

I'm gonna save this one. God, that was classic. Felt SO good reading it. Like taking a good $hit. I hate the Yankees too, the whole attitude. Like they were God's gift to baseball. Sure, Babe, Lou, Yogi and Joe were great but I'd just as soon see them playing for a worthwhile team like the Red Sox or something. I also think the Dodgers should come back to Brooklyn.

Let's just say that God doesn't believe in me.

reply

Why is the "World Series " called "World Series"?

reply

[deleted]

I think the previous ranters completely forgot the 1963 World Series when the Dodgers SWEPT the d Yankers. I remember seeing a retrospective piece on Dodger Stadium, and John Roseboro (the Dodger catcher) talked about that series. Somebody, Koufax or Drysdale, had just struck out Mickey Mantle on like three pitches. Mantle turned back to Roseboro and said, "Who can hit stuff like that? Nobody should be expected to hit stuff like that." The Yankers scored like 4 runs in 4 games. Roger Kahn (who wrote The Boys of Summer) called the Dodger pitching of the early 60s "the kind of pitching that makes victory certain."

And JackRabbitt, I love your answer above.

reply

America has won all but two World Series. Isn't that amazing?

reply

America has won all but two World Series. Isn't that amazing?

No.

Considering, until 1969, all the teams were American. And there was only ever two non-American teams (and now there is just one again).
To answer the earlier question...

Q."why is it called the World Series?"
A. American arrogance.

It doesn't matter that Baseball is played wonderfully in Many countries (remember the World Baseball Classic last summer...Japan vs. Cuba in the final), to Americans if their league has a champion, they must be the World Champions! It's the same as in basketball. America hasn't been doing too good in recent years at the World Championships, yet of course, the NBA champ is dubbed the World Champion!

whatever.

reply

[deleted]

Yes, I was being very sarcastic, bigsoundp was being very sensitive.

MLB has called it the "World" Series for over 100 years. During this time, America's baseball players/teams were far superior to anywhere else in the world. Many other countries didn't know what baseball was, much less have any players.

Yes, there are many wonderful players from around the world. Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Japan, Korea, etc... but they all come to the United States to play the best baseball in the world.

And yes America is arrogant, so what! That's why we are the GREATEST nation in the world. Grow up and get over it!

reply

Arrogance is hardly a character trait of Greatness.

reply


Arrogance is hardly a character trait of Greatness.

While I will agree with that. I will also say in the case of this country, we are great, and it's OK to be arrogant.

Now, are we gonna keep this going? Or have you realized that I'm having fun at your expense?

reply

[deleted]

By the way, players from other countries don't come to play ball in America because it's the best brand of baseball; it's because the biggest salaries are paid here. You gotta remember; it's always about money, whether it's government, business, or churches. Make that most churches; not all.

reply

hate to break it to all you MLB haters out there but the best collection of baseball talent is found in MLB.

reply

[deleted]

We're so great...Canadians have a great value for their dollar than we do. We're so great, we're bent over at the OPEC's whim. Whatever...all this false nationalism and pseudo-pride is why this country is in the mess that it is. I love my family, i'm pretty damn indifferent towards a country that's indifferent to me.

reply

Well, at least most of you at are willing to admit the strong Eastern bias, even if you'll argue that it's warranted. As I pointed out long ago on this thread, its also massively liberal (outside of stalwart, George Will). This isn't the only perspective, even on the East Coast. This is not the only way to tell the story of baseball. Burns has shown in before that he's capable of documenting the larger view. His last documentary, "The War", for instance, doesn't have this problem.

"Everything" in baseball occurred on the East Coast? Not so. I don't remember much time spent on Chicago (except a little on the 1908 series, if I remember), Detroit (except a section demonizing Ty Cobb, the "single black mark" on baseball as a smug Okrent puts it), St. Louis, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, etc. It's not an argument of what's most important. Clearly, the Yankees will, and should, garner more attention than the White Sox. It's a simple matter of representation, however, which doesn't give as accurate a view as it could have. It's an NYC intellectual perspective.

reply

Okrent may be smug, but he was still right. Cobb was a great player, but a volatile human being and a borderline psychotic. 100 years from now, should people remember Bonds just for his accomplishments? I hope not. They should remember him as a disgrace to the game, and huge jerk. Same with A-Roid. This film was not supposed to be a series of stat sheets, but story of the people behind the stats and legends. Read Al Stump's piece in The Baseball Reader "Ty Cobb's Wild Ten-Month Fight To Live" before you argue with me that he was psychotic. And I'm sorry, but what the hell does political ideology have anything to do with this?

reply

Al Stump was a complete and total hack. He spent very little time with Cobb, despite his claims, and turned his "book" into an agenda-driven sensation piece (despite what the movie "Cobb" portrayed, Stump did not choose to portray Cobb as a hero and sold his trashy first articles within weeks of Cobb's death). Of course, anyone basing their opinion of Cobb on that book alone would believe he was a psychotic. Besides this, Cobb was cancer-ridden, alcoholic, and at the nadir of his life when he met Stump. No one who knew Cobb personally backs up Stump's vision of the man. All due respect, but I would recommend that you base your conclusions on more than Stump's "bio" hatchet piece. You'll find that, for starters, this psychotic left a quarter of his estate to charity, was highly successful in business and was also a major contributer to other charitable organizations that continue to this day.

reply

Baseball needs to make it self truely itnernational by having what we've called the World Series, really the American Championship, be a stepping stone to a true World Series. I thing there should be an Asian league and a Latin American League and their champions should play and the winner should face the winenr of the AL-NL winner. And maybe someday Europe and Africa can become involved.

reply

just remember where the majority of the players on those "other" national teams in the World Baseball Clasic play their professional ball.... in the MLB or in the minors.

FACT: The winner of the World Series can and will beat any other non-MLB team in the world. Becaue if any other team had good/great players, they'd already be playing in the MLB.

reply

...is the coverage of the 1960 World Series. The Pirates were the Mets of the 50's. The worst team of the 1950's was the 1952 Pirates, who went 52-112. The team continued to have losing records until 1958, when they briefly were in contention, then slipped back in 1959. But they won the pennant in 1960 and abosrbed 12-0, 16-3 and 10-0 lickings from the mighty Yankees before coming back to win on Bill Mazerowski's dramatic home run in the greatest baseball game ever played, one that went 4-0, 4-7, 9-7, 9-9 and 10-9. It was the equivalent of the '69 Mets beating the mightly Orioles on Bobby Thompson's home run.


But how is it handled here? By interviewing Yankee fans on how disgusted they were that the undeserving Pirates won a fluke series over their beloved Yankees. Not one Pirate player or fan is interviewed. Meanwhile Thompson's home run is the greatest home run of all time, the Mets are the greatest Cinderella team of all time and Carleton Fisk hit the most famous World Series home run of all time to win the greatest game of all time.

Right......

reply

There is no doubt about the bias. I love this documentary, but yes, it's New York & Boston all the way. First of all, Ken Burns is from New York as are the vast majority of his commentators - save for those who actually played baseball. I suppose it also goes without saying that they are also quite the left-wing bunch (save for usual token George Will and perhaps a few precious others). Should it be so lopsided? I totally understand the slant towards these teams and what they represent in the games’ history but there are certainly other perspectives/stories to be heard. Sure, there are some interesting vignettes – and the typical trashing of Ty Cobb (whom Okrent describes as "the single black mark on baseball") – but the concentration is pretty hard to ignore. And why aren't there more players represented? There are plenty that could speak for themselves better than anyone.

The New York connections:

1. Billy Crystal - actor/comedian, NY native, grew up a Yankees fan

2. Roger Angell - writer for "The New Yorker" Magazine and NY native. One of many Harvard alumni involved with the doc.

3. Mario Cuomo - Governor of New York, born & bred in Queens

4. Doris Kearns Goodwin - Historian, Brooklyn-bred, staunch Dodgers fan, and Harvard grad. In college, she converted to a die-hard Boston fan!

5. Stephen Jay Gould - background primarily in science. Faculty member at Harvard, raised in Queens, New York

6. George Plimpton - Journalist who, although usually associated with New England's upper-crust as well as his alma mater, Harvard University, was actually born & bred (and died) in New York City.

7. John Sayles - New York native & filmmaker. Made "Eight Men Out" about the 1919 Chicago White Sox.

8. Studs Terkel - Although typically associated with Chicago, Studs was born & raised in NYC until he was 10. Indeed, his presence here is mostly devoted to talking about the Dodgers.

9. Daniel Okrent – Editor-in-chief at the New York Times for many years.

10. Robert Creamer - New York native, Sports Illustrated writer and Babe Ruth biographer.

11. Red Barber - Broadcaster primarily known for work with the Brooklyn Dodgers and later the NY Yankees.

12. Bob Costas - New York native broadcaster and unabashed Yankees fan.

13. Mickey Mantle – NY Yankees legend

14. Marvin Miller - Union organizer and Bronx native.

15. Rachel Robinson – Georgia native and wife of Brooklyn Dodger legend, Jackie Robinson.

16. Vin Scully - Bronx native and voice of the Brooklyn Dodgers.


Red Sox Connections:

1. Ted Williams - Red Sox legend

2. Bill Lee – Nutty Boston Red Sox pitcher in the 70s.


No immediate connections (but arguments could be made):

1. Hank Aaron – Milwaukee/Atlanta Braves legend

2. Buck O’Neil – Kansas City Monarchs legend

3. Thomas Boswell – Washington DC native and Post columnist.

4. Shelby Foote – novelist/historian and Mississippi native primarily known for Civil War work.

5. Gerald Early – Philadelphia native and professor/essayist on African-American culture

6. Shirley Povich – Maine native and Washington Post columnist for an incredible 75 years.

7. George Will – Illinois native, Oxford/Princeton grad and political pundit.

8. Bob Feller – Cleveland Indians legend.

9. Curt Flood – Cardinal center-fielder who challenged the reserve clause.

10. Ted “Double Duty” Radcliffe – Negro League legend.


That's all of 'em. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s 18-10 (16 alone are New York-centric; 12 of them were actually born there). It should also be noted too that this stat doesn’t reflect the amount of time these commentators receive. And, if you want to go just "East Coast-centric", Boswell, Will, Povich and Early all have obvious associations there, making this score 22-6. If I throw Ken Burns himself in there, it becomes 23-6.

I'm no whiner. The doc is what it is, and it's Ken Burns' vision, to be sure. I think it's a great piece of filmmaking. But let's not kid ourselves either; it's not definitive or balanced by any stretch. How could it possibly be with all these New Yorkers on hand?








reply

[deleted]

ken burns was free to put his documentary together the way HE wanted to.


Yes, and I wouldn't argue that he should not be. It's his vision, as I said, but it's an extreme New York one. I'm not saying those teams don't deserve their time, or that it isn't an excellent documentary, but after what I illustrated in my post, it's hard to argue that the film in its entirety isn't overwhelmingly from a New York voice & perspective. Are you saying that it isn't? You don't have to be a documentarian to admit this.

reply

[deleted]

Ha! It would've worked better with more slavery advocates?

Seriously, I don't think it's comparable. Like I said, I love "Baseball", but I'm not sure what the purpose is in denying what many have pointed out about it. Comparatively, not all of Burns' documentaries are this way. His new film, "The War", for instance, while focused on only four different American towns, has a much broader range of pundits in that nearly every one of them are speaking from their own experiences on the homefront and/or in the armed forces. "Baseball", on the other hand, features very few experienced in the actual game (almost none, in fact, outside of Buck O'Neil. Blink and you may miss Bob Feller, Hank Aaron and Ted Williams). The vast majority of commentators are East Coast writers/intellectuals.

reply

While I appreciate your point, the Civil War was not about slavery; it was rooted in the issu of states' rights vs. a strong central government. The Union had four slave states throughout the conflict. That would mean both sides were fighting for slavery. I know you're not discussing Civil War causes here...but let's keep our facts straight, even if we are just making humorous points. Thanks!

"I can't see your mind or your will. Does that mean they don't exist?"

reply

[deleted]

...in any way we please. Are they points we've been making wrong? Or do you just object to our making them? If we applied your logic, the IMDB would have no commentaries at all- except from the filmmakers.

reply

west coast bias smells of suntan lotion, tequila, and perfume. 



"You have to live life to its full chorizo!"-Mario Batali🏄

reply

You are such an IDIOT!
Baseball started in the east coast.
Wasn't until the Giants, Dodgers moved to California that they had a team.

Shove some more coke up your nose bone head.

reply

How the game started has nothing to do with the issue at all.

reply

Great documentary but DEFINITELY an East Coast bias, and as someone said earlier, that was his prerogative as filmmaker.

One of the most obvious points is that someone like Ernie Banks got LITERALLY 10 seconds and about 2 sentences said about him in the whole documentary.

At least he did a good segment on Bob Gibson.

reply

[deleted]

yes it does idiot!
where it started and began is where it's base is. it grows from there.

reply

They continued to talk about the Giants and Dodgers AFTER they were in California. They also talked about Bob Gibson (St. Louis). The reason there is an "East Coast Bias" is because most people everywhere else don't care about baseball anymore. Most people here don't either, but on a smaller scale.

reply

Let's not forget an important point here: if Burns were to go in-depth into every single team and every single World Series and give equal time to every single geographic region with a baseball legacy, his documentary would take ten years to watch and it's companion book would weigh a ton.

In the preface to his companion book, Burns acknowledges his New York/Boston bias. His intention was not to write a textbook. He was merely trying to present a narrative.

I hate the Yankees just like the next guy. I'm an Orioles fan, for God's sake. But when you get down to brass tacks, you have to admit the truth: The Cincinnati Reds might be the oldest team in baseball, but they have only won five World Championships. The Yanks have 26. They've been in 39. The next closest team is the Cardinals with 10. No other team has had the talent: when Joe Torre and Derek Jeter have their numbers retired, the Yankees will no longer be able to field players with single-digit numbers on their backs. There's your bias.

And for those who feel that Chicago got the cold shoulder, save it. Ernie Banks was a great player, but he never dominated the game like the Babe or Ty Cobb or Ted Williams. More to the point, Ernie Banks never played in the postseason. Hate to break it to you, Second City, but your baseball relevancy up until 2005 (11 years after Burns' documentary) ended with Shoeless Joe and the Black Sox.



The Horror. The Horror.

reply