Well we know that FOD was fake...
but what about this?
I was kind of disappointed when I heard that FOD was fake.
Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved through understanding.
Haven't seen this flick, so I basically shouldn't be talking to begin with, but, like others, I would not be surprised if ToD was faked as well. In fact, I personally believe that most of the footage is faked to begin with (not having seen it). I mean, it's easy to make disgusting looking fake aftermath scenes and such, tape them on a variety of film cameras, and then present them as some gross-out shockumentary. I believe the guy at SexGoreMutants noticed the same corpse twice in different scenes (recognizable because of his tattoo or something). In any case, this is the horror movie I'd make. And I'd say it was real, too.
shareWhile I agree with you that it is easy to fake a death scene with some corn syrup and some animal guts from the local butcher's shop, I can tell you with 100% certainty that Traces of Death--at least this particular volume--is absolutely genuine.
The reason for this is because most of the footage is relatively well-known and easy to acquire (the Budd Dwyer suicide, the Pit Durnet lion attack, the shooting on Spanish television, etc.) and the still photographs came straight out of crime scene and forensics picturebooks, and are pretty recognizable if you're familiar with them.
I can't speak for the sequels, though.
***
Your favorite movie sucks!
No, your wrong, the lion attack is fake. It was on a faces of death tape a while back. Don't you think if it was real all the cars and people around would try to do something to help rather than film their friend being eaten? You can also tell it is not authentic by the movement of the camera and the specific shots the audience is shown. A good fake, but a fake.
share