I believe he mentioned the name of the author, but I didn't recognize it. He explains in the seminar that it is an image of perfect love, and what makes it perfect is its unattainability. I believe that the significance it holds in the story is that, coming at the beginning, it helps explain the character of C.S. Lewis as a detached intellectual. He talks a great deal about love, undoubtedly knows all the different forms (whether from the Greek or Christian perspective), emphasizes in his public lectures that God wants us to love each other, but he seems incapable of anything but "unattainable" love. He remains emotionally distant from anyone with whom he might form an attachment because he had been burned as a child (the traumatic loss of his mother when he was nine), and cannot bear the thought of being hurt again. That is the supreme irony of the film - he lectures others incessantly about God using pain to make us grow, but he refuses to let God do that with him because he has done everything to insulate himself from pain. Joy changes all that.
reply
share