this is a poor version of the film

They are two different types of media.

The movie is absolutely lovely, and I do not care if it is not exactly like the (also) superb book.

The essence was captured, and that's what matters.

While it strays and adds a few scenes here or there, the 1993 version is perhaps the best (American) adaptation of the book. The 1949 is far from the book; a very odd film. And the 1987 film changes the relations of the characters drastically so that there is no familial relation between Mary and the Cravens. Not to mention the fact that in the 1987 version Mary is likable and pitiable at the beginning of the film; we do not see her harsh, "contrary" ways until she meets Colin. The 1993 version sticks very close to the feeling and characterizations of the original text and I still say it's the best.

The 1975 version is exactly like the book! However, it's also a mini series and stretches out over 3 or 4 hours. For a feature-length film, the 1993 version does an amazing job!

[deleted]

Sorry, it looks like you're in the minority here. This version is one of my favorite movies in general, and certainly my favorite of the book. Sure, it deviates from the plot, but like others have said, books and films are two different mediums, and what I like about this version is how completely it creates a magical, haunting ghost story, which is really the essence of the book. The cinematography is brilliant, and everything is so well-executed.

However, if the 1987 version is your favorite, far be it for me to say otherwise. You stick to your guns.

Just because something is faithful it does not mean it's good! This movie is well scripted, well shot, and brilliantly acted. There is nothing actually bad you can say about this movie.