The True Story...


Taken from Cracked.com's, "7 Movies Based on a True Story (That Are Complete Bull sh!t )"

The Hollywood Version:

It seems that back in the '70s, there was a plucky little football player who dreamed of nothing other than playing for the Notre Dame Fighting Irish. Unfortunately for young Rudy, his support system consisted of people who went out of their way to point out his flaws, of which there were many, and let him know repeatedly that dreams are the main ingredient in the devil's pudding.

Thankfully, Rudy's best friend from back home got blown right the *beep* up in a freak accident, inspiring him to play football for some reason. And play he did, no thanks to the evil scheming of Notre Dame coach Dan Devine, who only allowed Rudy on the field after the entire team threatened to walk out otherwise.

In reality ...

The real life Dan Devine was actually the one who insisted on playing Rudy in his final game. Hell, even when the movie was being made, Devine gave the filmmakers permission to turn him into the film's villain in order to help Rudy, who he considered a good friend.

Devine sounds like one helluva guy, right? So naturally he was repaid for his kindnesses by being turned into the Snidely *beep* Whiplash of college football (sans mustache), and forever being remembered as the crotchety coach to whom winning football games was more important than anything. Anything other than ensuring that Rudy's dream would die.

By the way, ever wonder who saw Rudy play that day and got so inspired he just had to make it into a movie? Nobody. It was Rudy himself who spent a full decade trying to convince studios that his life was so awesome it deserved a movie, before one of them finally relented. That's the spirit, little guy!

-----------
"Why am I dying to live, if I'm just living to die?"
www.myspace.com/foxmask

reply

Interesting comparison. But it's my nature to identify whether the source is credible.

Where did this "reality" version originate... and is it true?

I don't accept claims at face value until I discover whether they have any credibility to them.

reply

its a great story and a good movie quit being a hater

reply

I still LOVE this movie. It moves me to tears every time probably because Sean Astin is remarkable in this. The music is award winning caliber. But the actual game itself was no big deal (well, except of course to Rudy!) Here is the footage from You Tube of Rudy's play from the actual Georgia Tech vs. Notre Dame game that he played in November of 1975.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z950ovP7N4

Joe

reply

I'd kind of like a second source or more info. Seeing th clip on youtube, did he even make the last tackle????

reply

I would post a link to the orriginal article but it contains the word sh!t in the url and the message board will automatically censor it. You're more than welcome to search the cracked.com database and they do site all their works. Just because they are a humor site does not mean everything they write about should be dismissed. In fact I've learned alot from this website.

-----------
"Why am I dying to live, if I'm just living to die?"

reply

A movie based on a true story is not the same thing as a documentary. The embellishments of "Rudy" do not bother me.

reply

The real life Rudy sounds like a crook. He made a settlement with the SEC about fraud charges. And I mean the Securities and Exchange Commission, not the Southeast Conference.


December 17, 2011
SEC Tackles 'Rudy' in Fraud Case
By Andrew Ackerman

WASHINGTON — The inspirational 1993 movie "Rudy" celebrates Daniel Ruettiger as a plucky underdog who overcomes long odds and his diminutive stature to earn a walk-on role on Notre Dame's legendary college-football team.

But in a settlement announced on Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission casts Mr. Ruettiger in a far less heroic light—as a key participant in a so-called pump-and-dump stock scheme that generated more than $11 million in allegedly illicit profits for a now-defunct beverage company, Rudy Nutrition.

"Investors were lured into the scheme by Mr. Ruettiger's well-known, feel-good story but found themselves in a situation that did not have a happy ending," said Scott Friestad, associate director of the SEC's division of enforcement.

The company made and sold a sports drink called "Rudy" with the tagline "Dream Big! Never Quit!" But the SEC charged that Mr. Ruettiger and 12 others made false and misleading statements about their company in news releases, SEC filings and promotional materials during 2008 in a scheme to lure investors, inflate the stock price and then sell their shares at a profit.

For instance, a letter to potential investors falsely claimed that in "a major southwest test, Rudy outsold Gatorade 2 to 1!" the SEC said in its complaint.

"The tall tales in this elaborate scheme included phony taste tests and other false information that was used to convince investors they were investing in something special," Mr. Friestad said.

The pitch worked. In less than a month, the stock went from trading 720 shares a day to more than three million shares, and within two weeks its price climbed from 25 cents to $1.05 a share.

Mr. Ruettiger, who lives in Las Vegas, agreed to pay $382,866 to settle the SEC's charges without admitting or denying them—giving up his profits of $185,750 and paying a fine of $185,750 and interest. Ten other individuals also agreed to pay penalties to settle the SEC charges.

Neither Mr. Ruettiger nor his attorney could be reached for comment.

Mr. Ruettiger and a college friend founded the original company, called Rudy Beverage Inc., in South Bend, Ind. In Oct. 2007, the company moved to Las Vegas, where it struggled financially with a small number of customers, few assets and no profits, the complaint said.

In late 2007, Mr. Ruettiger and the company's president hired an experienced penny-stock promoter to orchestrate a public distribution of company stock. With the help of a disbarred California attorney, they orchestrated a so-called reverse merger with a dormant public company and turned Rudy Beverage into the publicly traded Rudy Nutrition by Feb. 2008, the complaint said.

In addition to false and misleading promotions, the SEC said the scheme's participants manipulated the trading of the company's stock using brokerage accounts in the name of offshore entities to make investor interest appear stronger than it actually was. The SEC says the group used the accounts of a series of Panamanian entities to manipulate the stock.

The agency is still pursuing litigation against stock promoters Pawel Dynkowski of Poland and Chad Smanjak of South Africa, who allegedly made about $4.2 million off the scheme that they deposited into Panamanian accounts the SEC couldn't trace. The two promoters couldn't immediately be reached for comment and the SEC said there are no known attorneys for them. Agency officials believe they aren't in the U.S.

Please click on
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970204553904577102690905539560-lMyQjAxMTAyMDEwNzExNDcyWj.html?mod=wsj_valettop_email

reply

The real life Rudy sounds like a crook. He made a settlement with the SEC about fraud charges. And I mean the Securities and Exchange Commission, not the Southeast Conference.


And this means what? Rudy was a less than marginal player, and probably knew even less about securities than he did about sports. Lots of athletes, actors, personalities put their name to a business without understanding a thing about it. If something goes wrong, they get hung with everyone else. He may have been naive and unsophisticated in the world of business, but I don't believe Rudy did anything intentionally illegal, and won't unless and until I see documented proof he did.






Just once, I'd like someone to call me sir without adding 'you're making a scene' ~H Simpson

reply

By the way, ever wonder who saw Rudy play that day and got so inspired he just had to make it into a movie? Nobody. It was Rudy himself who spent a full decade trying to convince studios that his life was so awesome it deserved a movie, before one of them finally relented. That's the spirit, little guy!


Okay, so he blew his own horn. None of that means a hill of beans if the story wasn't interesting or inspiring enough to put fannies in theater seats. He could yell all he wanted, but unless Rudy was going to put up the 12 million budget himself, the studio wouldn't film a thing if they didn't believe in the story. The fact is, Rudy was right: the story WAS worth filming.


Just once, I'd like someone to call me sir without adding 'you're making a scene' ~H Simpson

reply

"In reality ..."

Dan Devine did make the call that Rudy would dress in the final game. There was no jersey scene. So what? It was the custom that they would play every senior in the season's final home game, a custom that's been verified by several players on the team. The people who made the film wanted to inject some drama.

"In reality ..."

No one ever said that anyone was there at the game that day and was so inspired that they had to turn it into a movie. So why is this an issue?

Documentary - the truth
Feature based on a true story - dramatic license isn't an issue.

See the difference?



Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing.
Tarkin: Enough of this! Vader, release him!

reply

I've gotta say I didn't like Rudy in the movie. The guy walked about in a jacket passing himself off for something he wasn't, walked in on the coach stepping all over the secretary, unlocked the window to sneak in at night and spent his time hitting on girls for some slime ball. Nothing about the character did anything for me, but that's probably because I like genuine people who are honest and aren't rule breakers. Basically the character isn't someone I'd like in real life. Now I hear how the guy is a self promoting, (in my book that means you can't do it on your own merit), con-artist and I really don't like the real guy either.

reply