MovieChat Forums > Orlando (1993) Discussion > The old chestnut: film vs. book

The old chestnut: film vs. book


As book into film adaptations go, this is one of the better ones I've seen and it's certainly as refreshing as it is unusual to see a film whose director chooses to treat their audience as intelligent, thinking beings. The real problem is that, as a medium, film, while it can certainly be poetic, just isn't able to capture the sheer lyrical beauty of a novel like Orlando. There were many things in the film which impressed - and even moved - me; but there was nothing which even approached the soaring, heart-breaking beauty of the novels closing paragraphs when Orlando is standing under the old oak tree on the moonlit hill above his/her ancestral home. '....there sprang up over his head a single wild bird. "It is the goose!" Orlando cried. "The wild goose...."' I'm moved to tears every time I read it.

"That, - Captain Bligh, - that is the thing; - I am in hell, sir - I am in hell."

reply

I loved both the novel and film version of Virginia Woolf's Orlando. The language of the novel, and its free flowing form and thoughts...adjective after adjective after adjective ...is just gorgeous. Delicious read, but I thought the film captured the themes so accurately, thru a visual portrayal, rather than indulge in dialogue which would be untrue to the novel. But the real strength of the film is Tilda Swinton...who else could play such a part? I think secretly Tilda is a hermaphrodite!! (Only kidding... maybe!)
[email protected]

reply

I just finished this book and I absolutely loved it. I'll probably try to find the movie sometime soon, but I'm still soaking it in.
But I wondered, what do you think is the significance of "It is the goose! The wild goose"? I'm not really sure what that symbolized...


reply

[deleted]

I prefer the book. It's much more nuanced and the satirical social commentary is much more evident. Plus the ending in the movie is just odd and I didn't like the change from the book. Orlando had a son, dammit!

reply

how do you know s/he didn't have a son in the film? surely by not the appearance of the child? Orlando spent an entire movie on how gender roles are fluid. s/he himself had long hair and dressed ambiguously.

"Well, I'm here now."-Dark Harbor
twitter.com/#!/knightsn2dreams

reply

I would assume the child was female because the stated condition for Orlando keeping her house was that she have a son....and she had lost the house.

reply

This piece of celluloid is very thin, limp object after Virginia Woolf's prose has been stripped from it.

reply