Larenz Tate deserved an Oscar nod for his portrayal of O-Dog
Larenz was so believable and actually turned sociopathic O-Dog into a charismatic character. Anyone else agree?
~"Chris, am I weird?"
~"Yeah, but so what? Everybody's weird."
Larenz was so believable and actually turned sociopathic O-Dog into a charismatic character. Anyone else agree?
~"Chris, am I weird?"
~"Yeah, but so what? Everybody's weird."
Yeah he was great in this, there were gang members on the set who even seemed convinced he was the real thing, there's certainly been far lesser performances that have won Oscars (Russell Crowe in Gladiator to name one of many).
There are two kinds of people in the world my friend those with loaded guns and those who dig
O-Dog was a horrible excuse for a human being, but Mr. Tate played the role brilliantly. Actually, the entire cast was phenomenal. Top-notch performances all around.
shareAree 100% And on a project I am working on for the LA Times, I have him listed as one of the overlooked actors for this performance.
share[deleted]
The supporting actor category in 1993 was by far the the most stocked race in Oscar history. The guy who should've won, Val Kilmer for Tombstone, wasn't even nominated.
So yeah, Tate was great, but the fact that he didn't get recognized isn't anything to commiserate. He was just unfortunate to fall in the year he did.
"...if that was off, I'd be whoopin' your ass up and down this street." ~ an irate Tarantino
Sean Penn deserved a nomination, IMO, for Carlito's Way.
Tommy Lee Jones won for The Fugitive which was one of many Academy choices I didn't agree with.
Malkovich was better, so was Fiennes. Penn too.