After I posted I realized that.
It's still a different situation. Dinosaurs being transported by professionals versus dinosaurs behind electric fences (they think) being viewed by tourists, with the point being, we can't predict the behaviour of animals we've never encountered
That was the point of the film (and novel, the film had to get this across in a shorter amount of time); the animals are so new to us we have no idea how they will behave. Another good example is the encounter with the sick Triceratops; the animals become ill and the vets can't figure out why. There is a resolution, but this was cut from the film - in the end, it works even better to illustrate how difficult it is to make the park a success and keep the animals healthy in the very limited time there is left before the planned opening.
Reason why Muldoon did not have the advantage in the jungle; the Velociraptors hunted and trapped him the way Grant predicted. Muldoon, despite his experience, did not anticipate this or overlooked the possibility of the dinosaur coming at him from the side.
As for him not being able to shoot the Velociraptor; the animal was too close and he acted a little too slow. It's Malcolm's theory about unpredictability and systems falling apart at work.
Personally I do not believe more guns (or more characters with guns) would have made for a better film. It truly became a man vs. nature film without too many weapons, and nature almost won - the Tyrannosaurus saving the day was chaos at work as well (in the advantage of Grant, Sattler and the children.) , no one would have predicted that "rescue" as a possibility.
(In the original script, Grant would kill one of the Velociraptors in the Visitors Centre by trapping it in the Tyrannosaurus skeleton, and Hammond would shoot the last Velociraptor - but this scene was changed in favor of the more spectacular finale.)
reply
share