Is it?
Discuss.
"Tis a coward I am - but I will hold your coat."
To put it simply, he shouldn't have made this. It ended up costing him what should have been his masterpiece, The Magnificent Ambersons. Though The Mangnificent Ambersons is still a great film, if they hadn't cut 50 minutes out of it, it probably would have been the best film ever made.
shareYou didn't answer my question.
Also, I more or less disagree with what you did say.
"Tis a coward I am - but I will hold your coat."
I didn't know you had a question, you're title is "Is it?" and then you say "discuss" in your post. I thought you just meant, discuss as in discuss this film. As I stated before I've never seen this, I heard it's pretty bad because he didn't even edit it some guys did in the late 80's. Apparently they left out a huge portion of what he had shot. Other then how you might feel about The Magnificent Ambersons, I don't know how you could disagree that it was a huge mistake on his part to leave his film with a studio. Even he admitted that was a mistake.
shareFirst of all, this is not the Orson Welles movie that would have been called It's All True. This is a documentary about the failed making of said film, co-directed by Welles's assistant director on the earlier project, Richard Wilson, that incorporates all the finished footage from the project. The complete title of this film is It's All True: Based on an Unfinished Film By Orson Welles. IMDb should really list it that way. There isn't much "finished footage" from It's All True. It's All True was, however, going to be an anthology of Robert Flaherty-like shorter documentary films, and one of those short segments, called "Four Men On a Raft" is more or less complete and is included as part of this movie: it's worth seeing just for that. The other material is interesting too. Some of it is the first color footage that Welles (who was notoriously unsupportive of color in movies for most of his career) ever shot. It's hardly a coherent movie, but it is certainly interesting.
So you should totally see it. And read Catherine L. Benamou's It's All True: Orson Welles's Pan-American Odyssey(although be warned that it is incredibly pretentious and thickly written).
These are the parts of your post I disagreed with:
he shouldn't have made this
It ended up costing him what should have been his masterpiece
Though The Mangnificent Ambersons is still a great film...
...if they hadn't cut 50 minutes out of it, it probably would have been the best film ever made.
it was a huge mistake on his part to leave his film with a studio. Even he admitted that was a mistake.
[deleted]