MovieChat Forums > Fortress (1993) Discussion > Why such a low rating?

Why such a low rating?

posted 18 years ago by disintegration_88
9 replies | jump to latest

Come on this movie was great, it's not a masterpiece but it's almost.

HAIL TO THE KING BABY!

[–] 18 years ago

[deleted]

"Why such a low rating?"

Almost all movies on imdb are underrated. I think a lot of poeple haven't even seen this movie. I found part 1 and 2 at walmart for 5 bucks each. Very good deal considering how good both of them are.

[–] Flick_Montana 18 years ago

Why a low rating?

Because some people just don't get it.

This is a good movie.

~Aaron

[–] Cinema_Love 18 years ago

a lot of people are Christophe Lambert haters and just give his movies a 1/10 without seeing it so don't ask why!

[–] BabyLightMyFire 18 years ago

it was a good one. i had both for a dollar each. cheap. i thought it would be boring considering the cost of it but when i saw it, it was ACTUALLY good. it had a good plot unlike a lot of the present movies do.

_______KATIE_________

[–] Woodyanders 16 years ago

Because the majority of mainstream blockbuster-loving filmgoers have poor taste in movies, that's why!

I write bios, therefore I am.

[–] tommyuk 16 years ago

It's a B movie albeit a half decent one.I like it but I honestly wouldn't give it more than a 6.

[–] wazzaa-1 9 years ago

because most people are pussy's that can't take the violence so they down-vote this and up-vote *beep* like transformers.

[–] Badlands1 8 years ago

This movie was dry as sand, and I love my violence and B movies.. The sets sucked, the directing was absent, and it's over long.. Felt like foreigners trying to impersonate Americans in an American movie, everything felt wrong.