were the sex scenes real?


I think they really did F each other!!!
right?

reply

[deleted]

Dafoe was really naked when Madonna was on top of him and had erection - how do I know - You can see his penis visibly. She´s like on his stomach leaning back with her ass but you can see his penis visible under there.

reply

Ugh, who cares? For a movie about sex, its pretty unsexy. Madonna is about as sensual as a mannequin as she tries (and miserably fails) to outdo Sharon Stone in "Basic Instinct." What was Willem Dafoe thinking when he took this role? Well deserved Razzie nominations all around.

I watched a bit of it again last night, to see if it really was a bad as I remembered. Answer: Yes. Hopefully, Madonna has decided to bow out of acting now that she and Guy Ritchie are divorced. With the exception of "Desparately Seeking Susan," she has been horrible in everything she's been in.

reply

With the exception of "Desparately Seeking Susan," she has been horrible in everything she's been in.

I disagree. She was quite good in "Dangerous Game".

reply

What about Evita?

I'm happiest...in the saddle.

reply

I don't care much for musicals. But yes, she did a good job in that movie, too.

reply

It's quite funny if you watch the first sex scene, there's a wide shot when Dafoe is chasing Madonna up some stairs, and if you look carefully, you can clearly see that Dafoe is, um, "overexcited" about filming this scene with Madonna.

reply

[deleted]

She was good in "Evita" and pretty entertaining in "League of Their Own". But she was pretty bad in this.

reply

She had no dialogue in Evita, singing is not acting

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]