I don't get the criticism....
Reading most of the professional reviews and user comments here and elsewhere on the net, it seems to me the biggest complaint about this movie is that's it's "too comic", "is very violent for a kid's story", "because it's made by Disney, it's too entertaining and fun, not a serious social commentary on the evils of slavery" - and most astonishing of all; "doesn't follow the tone or style of the book at all"!!!!????
Excuse me, but what book are folks reading??? The version of "Huckleberry FInn" I've read at least, that appears to be the exact tone of the story. It's a fun, exciting, humerous adventure story - with social commentary and critique **contained** inside of it. Need I quote the famous author's note on this work, where Twain essentially says that trying to read deep themes into his work means you deserve to be hung, drawn and quartered?!! Yeah, it's meant to be a joke, but you at least get his intention.
So basically the reasons given as to why this movie is so bad, are reasons that would actually apply to the book itself just as well. To me that indicates that the movie got it right - warts and all, faults and everything. The problem is that most critics wanted this to be **more** close to their abstract interpretation of the novel that the novel itself actually is. They wanted this to be a dramatization of an English Lit essay of the story rather than of the story itself. And the fact that the movie doesn't try to do that (a good thing in my opinion) makes this a "bad" version of the story. On the contrary, I think that makes it a brilliant version of the story.
Yes, the original novel is a classic piece of literature that handles some serious social issues - but does it in a fun, accessible, humerous way. It's social commentary hidden in a boys'own adventure yarn. Surely a good movie adaptation (which I think this is) would preserve all aspects of that. It's ridiculous to blame a movie for not doing more with a theme than the book itself does.
I am - SUPERFLUOUS!!!