MovieChat Forums > Babylon 5 (1993) Discussion > Do you have any particular disappointmen...

Do you have any particular disappointments with B5?


Me. My disappointments were not actually seeing the Vorlon Planet Killer destroy a planet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl7C6_qa1Do

(I would like to know how it's weapon functioned. I couldn't tell if a destructive beam came from that ball of energy, or if the Planet Killer just launches that ball of energy at the planet itself.)

I would've also liked to have seen the Thirdspace Capital Ships attack. http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/babylon5/images/9/9a/Thirdspace_capital_ship-01.png/revision/latest?cb=20090816000807http://www.hiperkapu.hu/sci-fi/Babylon_5/Thirdspace_Cruiser.jpg
(It would've been cool to see the offensive power of these Ships in action.)

reply

Well, it's tempting to point to the premature resolution of the Shadow War, but I'm going to go with the lack of resolution to the mating experiment with Lyta and G'kar.

reply

Or their fate in general. Maybe it was in the movies.

reply

I'm probably in a minority here, but I never liked the actress for Ambassador Delenn and the love story between her and Sheridan seems so forced, I roll my eyes whenever it's brought up.

reply

Why can't she invoice / aspirate her consonants? Does Serbian or whatever not have the letter T (which she pronounces as D)?

As for serious disappoints, I was sad by home much religion they shove down our throats.

As for non-serious ones, I'm sad they didn't get Barack Obama to play the doctor since they are exact in every way except Obama has more sex appeal.

reply

The Shadows were 'foreshadowed' for so long, and then they end up being something so tangible, so mundane, so solid, so rigid..

When they could've been something more 'ninjalike', mysterious, never-seen-properly, a bit like the 'alien' in the first 'Alien' movie, maybe. The concept of 'shadows' has SO much potential, and the 'shadows' being some ancient species was hyped and foreshadowed so much, and everyone was so scared of them..

..then they turn out to be just badly modelled, rigid things that don't have very 'shadowy' powers after all.

I mean, sure, some.. but SO MUCH MORE could've been done with them, and the whole thing just became a wrestling match between one, boring, mundane, predictable species and another (that was also supposed to be like 'antithesis' of the shadows, full of wisdom and 'angelic' qualities - but also they turned out to just be too 'human' and egotistical in the end. It's like, what's the point?)

My disappointment about all this is, things, entities and beings became diluted and three-dimensional, when they were hinted to be something so much greater and multi-dimensional, independent of time and space - something 'beyond', something 'astral-etheric-divine' quickly became just 'plastic toy soldiers blasting each other' in the mundane world.

It's like people can imagine 'wonder', but they can never put it on screen in a believable way without diluting or 'mundanizing' it until it's just another boring cliché concept.

Why couldn't the shadow ships be 'ethereal', not really in any specific location, or multi-locational, instead of solid 3D objects?

Why couldn't they be more an 'esoteric force' that influences people and beings, and even bends light, but doesn't really have any solid substance to attack? They could dim the lights of an area (or seemingly so, creating a dramatic effect although the light isn't really affected) while influencing someone with EXTREME temptation and lust and promise to fulfill and satisfy that lust...

reply

There could've been SO much psychological play like that. But no, just make black, spiderlike, solid 3D-objects that can't even move like spiders.

There could've been so much the shadows could've done 'from the shadows'.. creating shadows, from where to attack, and such. But no, just the typical, predictable things.

With all this mystique, it's so disappointing that the nihilism and the 'only physical is real' stuff of the authors always kill any otherwise imaginative stories.

We have NEVER seen stories (sci-fi or otherwise) on screen (or TV), where meridians, chakras, silver cord, past incarnations, etc. would've been used to a great effect - and they COULD be, and it could be immensely interesting, but we've seen zillions of these mundane stories about blasting 3D objects in space and injected romance everywhere.

Isn't it time we could see something different, something we haven't seen before? Heck, even time travel stories do not DARE bring up past incarnations - think how INTERESTING it could be to travel back in time 500 years to talk to a past incarnation of yourself!


reply

The Byron arc was lame and almost ruined season 5. I'd have preferred a time jump at the start of season 5 and they concentrate on Londo's reign as Emperor instead, the whole Drakh war and seeing what happens with John and Delenn's son and the keeper he was "gifted" on his 16th birthday. Also Bester's fate and Lyta too. Instead we got Byron. Sigh.

reply

Too much use of apostrophe in character names. This is lazy writing. Low production values. B5 was not a network series: it was a syndicated series, sold to local stations who had very weak—or no—network affiliation, the Stargate and Total Recall 70 series. Too much tedium in the narrative. It was great, if you’re 12. This would not fly today.

How did a low-functioning alcoholic like Garibaldi even get his job, let alone keep it?

Biggest disappointment: not nearly enough of Tracy Scoggins. She was the only reason why I watched this.

reply