Lacks humanity


I appreciate this series is about people finding a second home, literally and metaphorically, and that the characters all reach this in different ways etc etc, but I couldn't help thinking that the series lacked some compassion. In the first series, there was a kind of sympathy with nearly all the characters, no matter which background, even when they were stupid, poor, or misguided/misled.

Parents, the elderly and rural people are all presented as caricatures, and loathsome, whereas the artistic caste's failings are excused as evidence of their own genius. I have to admit, I found the idea of this elite having licence to change the world slightly reminscent of the part of history which the series claims to condemn - the Baader Meinhof Gang also had some of this mentality. There is a hint of class snobbery about it, since most of this elite is thoroughly middle class (or aspires to be) - the only exception I can think of was the old Bavarian ?saw mill? owner who takes in Hermann and his jazz friend.

Many youngsters, and people from the world's cities are just as guilty of ignorance as anyone from the country, or older folk in my experience.

reply

You have to separate the medium from the message. The series isn't lacking in compassion, just because it shows people that are lacking in compassion. On the contrary. The series tells a story about people that may be lacking in compassion, but to tell that story you simply need enormous amounts of compassion. It isn't easy showing the ugly parts of humanity, but it takes compassion to do so.

Also, you have to take into account the self-biographical aspects of all the Heimat stories. Of course I understand that there's enormous amounts of fiction and artistic license involved, but the fact is, in Zweite Heimat, Edgar Reitz tells us the story of his own generation.

Edgar Reitz is Hermann. When he left his own heimat in the fifties and became a filmmaker, he was a part of that kind of group of people. They went to the Academy, they were angry, they were snobbish, they were rebellious, they were self absorbed, their parents were nazis during the war, and they grew up as adults in the sixties, to the tune of the German economic wirtschaftswunder.

When Edgar Reitz did the first Heimat series, he told that story in a slightly rebellious manner. He depicted them as the lovely bunch of rural people they were, for better and for worse. Some where seen as stupid, poor and misguided. Because, that was the way he saw them. It was a personal revenge, and a way of coming to terms with his own background. The series was made with love and compassion, but also with quite a bit of mockery of their folkish way.

Having come to terms with his own background, he made the Zweite Heimat to come to terms with himself and his entire generation, the "angry young men". And that means analysing oneself, and everything one has gone through in ones entire life. I don't think that's an easy task, and it's very easy to just take the easy way out and sugar it all up, only showing the good parts, or the fun parts.

That Reitz manages to show such a complex era in humanity, for better and for worse, speaks of his ability as a story teller and filmmaker. The 60's was a crazy time in history, with all that went with it. Those people were self absorbed, and totally in love with their own quite irrelevant obsessions. But that is how young, gifted and talented people are in that age.

If you see them as lacking in compassion and humanity, that's because that is what they are and were, and that is how Edgar Reitz saw them, and that is why he shows them to us in that way. That lack of compassion is also something they all had to come to terms with, in time, and with experience in life. In that context, Heimat 3 is the tale of closure, how his generation found their inner peace.

Taken as a whole, the Heimat saga is one of the most compassionate works of art I have ever seen. It's so rich, and have such a depth, emotionally, historically. The characters are complex, there's ambiguity, even people lacking in compassion. But that is also a human trait, the world is a very complex place. There are more shades than black or white, people simply aren't just good or bad, but good and bad at the same time. And Edgar Reitz shows us all that, because that's how he sees us, for what we are.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder

reply

I'm well aware that there's a large chunk of Reitz in Hermann, but that's where the problem lies.

The director somehow doesn't embue this series with humanity. It's not just the actors that are the problem, it's the portrayal of the characters.

As a slightly Bohemian type myself, who has moved from the country to the big city, in my experience city folk are not that much superior to rural people when it comes to ignorance/knowledge, talent/stupidity etc. All that I see is a larger grouping of people...

reply

No, of course not, they don't have to be superior to anybody. That's the point. The fine point is how they look at themselves. And if superior is how they feel, then superior is how they will look like. That wee see them as pathetic fools that takes themselfs far too seriously is another matter.

You have to look at this issue in a different way, because you have totally misunderstood the entire point of it all, what you are doing is shooting the pianist. What Reitz does, is holding up a mirror to the world, saying: "Look. This is how it is. The world is an ugly place." Does that mean that Reitz is lacking in compassion and humanity, or does it mean that the entire human kind is lacking in compassion and humanity?

reply

'What Reitz does, is holding up a mirror to the world, saying: "Look. This is how it is. The world is an ugly place." Does that mean that Reitz is lacking in compassion and humanity, or does it mean that the entire human kind is lacking in compassion and humanity?'

We all know there's ugliness in the world, but in this instance, Reitz's mirror could do with a bit of dusting.

reply



Thanks for saving me A LOT of words, Chester-Copperpot. ;)
Very well said.

Only, I wouldn't say Reitz is presenting the world as an "ugly" place.
I don't think he ever perceived it as that (at least not based on what I've seen).
What he is saying is that the world is a befuddling place that more often than not does not correspond to your expectations or aspirations - and that is true for all people, regardless of their social status, intelligence or any other parameter one might wish to apply.











reply

Reitz's "Spiegel" needs polishing.

---
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

reply