EXACTLY WHERE SHE NEEDS TO BE...


Her narcissistic tendancies are what lead to the demise of her marriage and ultimately to her incarceration. Betty Broderick is exactly here she needs to be. And like Charles Manson, (who was never convicted of any murder) I hope she is never again afforded the luxury or liberty of seeing the light of a free day...

reply

[deleted]

And let me guess you were a *beep* fly on the wall and knew exactly everything that happened between Betty & Dan Broderick......People go crazy and Betty happened to snap back into reality by pulling a trigger on a gun.....What do you do when your backed into a corner......what happens with your human instincts......who knows really why she went over to Dan & Linda's house that night.....yes she had a gun, maybe for murder, maybe for intimidation, maybe for suicide, maybe for all of the above, however I do not agree with your judgements on this matter......its a terrible thing that happened......however she murdered them.......compared to people that spend 10 or less years in prison for rape, child molestation, murdering someone by torture......Betty Broderick killed them with a pistol...quick and clean, she was a pissed of bitch....she shot them to set herself free from his powerful influence on the judicial system and he *beep* her over so many ways.....a slap in the face wasn't enough to get him to stop........she has released documents to the media...documents that were sent to her by Dan that prove his power trip ego!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply

Wow, now there's some logical, rational thinking. I reiterate. If she's stupid enough to think that "pulling a trigger" is going to set her free? Then "SHE'S EXACTLY WHERE SHE NEEDS TO BE." Our prisons are full of idiots that thought "pulling a trigger" was the answer. Because it has done anything BUT set her free. However, at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter what YOU think. Or what I think. What matters, is that a jury of her peers decided she was a liar and a murderer and no longer deserves the luxury and liberty of being out here with the rest of us in a free society.

Being on a "power trip" isn't a capital crime. Murder is...

reply

SO after thinking this out and re-reading publications about Betty and the court transcripts her side versus Dan's side which was limited by word of mouth from his children, family and restraining orders I have the conclusion....Betty Broderick married to Dan living the luxurious life, the big houses the hot shot attorney as a husband....she was demanding and got what she wanted...and was probably very selfish and self centered.....I'm sure Dan had his flaws and I'm sure his money made him a bit of a snob....who wouldn't be, he was the president of the San Diego bar association, and not a snob by choice but by nature, he was married to Betty...The Movie portrays him as this really great guy who did nothing wrong within his marriage to Betty, he was flawless as they portrayed him....I didn't know the man so I can't say......and because Betty was selfish and self centered she didn't care about Dan's feelings and he had enough of her dramtic crap and wham.....he pulled the plug and she got pissed.........she lashed out in revenge and selfishness and with each attempt she made to make his life worse he came back and every repercussion he handed out to her it increased her anger and jealousy and she eventually became bitter and destructive probably had a lot of psychological problems that took over her life, she became determined to let her friends and family and the whole community that knew them both to think he was this big bad wolf and she was innocent of wrong doing.....she says it wasn't revenge it was self defense all the blows she dealt him.....when she couldn't scream loud enough, when people gave up on her because of her obsession......she probably most likely knowingly knew that the only way to get people to pay attention to her was to kill Dan and Linda happened to be a threat as well!!! She deserves her time in prison, she learned that her money and fame didn't get her out of jail......She claims Dan abused her physically but never called the police as not to ruin his reputation.....and truthfully she loved his money more than him.......domestic violence would have meant possibility of being dis-barred from his legal practice and then.....NO INCOME.....NO MONEY....NO PAMPERED BETTY BRODERICK......She killed him out of selfishness, desperation, attention, revenge, and anger....and she was probably crazy. I still hope she gets out of prison, we know she lied to reporters and newpapers and the media and public......thats why women looked up to her then......there are people that believe in "An Eye For An Eye".....I am one of them......If Dan really treated Betty that bad she shouldn't have killed him, she should have taken her children moved far far away, married another rich man and/or made herself famous in a big city....She didn't think about this and here is what I would have done if I were Betty. If Dan divorced me I would have went to College and became an Attorney, If I wanted to be pathetic I would have rivaled against him and she would have made herself rich....people would have wanted her to be their attorney....she was a bitch......and a lot of people like Soap Opera's they would have loved to see Dan & Betty against each other as Attorneys....it would have been heated courtrooms and huge victories and VERY LARGE EGO's. She killed him for an obvious purpose......he is out of her life and people paid attention to her, they made a movie about her, she is referred to in publications, she was featured on Court TV......she got what she wanted except one thing.....for a jury to declare her innocent.

reply

FYI LVFraudDetective, Charles Manson is serving a life sentence for 9 counts of murder. He wasn't there for them, but prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi got a gulity verdict based on the special circumstances of the case. Betty's husband's affair was what caused the demise of the marriage. If anyone was a narcissist, it was Dan. Read the books based on the case. His appearance and status were VERY important to him, and he needed a young "trophy wife" to further inflate his ego. Marriage, kids, and commitment be damned. I'm not saying they deserved to die, but definitely handed Betty the loaded gun, metaphorically speaking.

"You're such a pillow case!"-Heathers

reply

That's a very interesting take on a terribly unfortunate circumstance. I'll say only this... 1.) You're correct, neither Dan, or his new wife deserved to die for being human... 2.) If our society sought to justify the taking of another human life is every circumstance where a man or woman was guilty of vanity or perhaps a mid-life crisis, none of us would be safe... Think of the deceased in terms of someone YOU love and care for. Your mother? Father? Brother? Sister? A close friend perhaps? Any one you care for who committed the fatal error of falling out of love? I've read the books you refer to and seen the movie. If there is an absolute common denominator in all of these, it's that Betty is a few sandwiches shy of a picnic. To err is human - to murder, however, ends you up precisely where Betty is today... And like the millions of other felons in the jails and prisons thoughout our country that thought they too could do what they wished, the LAW be damned, Betty too is "exactly where she needs to be"...

Thanks for the post Heathers...!!

reply

[deleted]

*rolls eyes* Everybody's an expert.

Well, she is where she needs to be until she's paroled. And she should be.

Charles Manson used other people to do his dirty work for him. Please. At least Betty had the guts to do it herself.


God save Donald Duck, vaudeville and variety

reply

LOLOL... Yeah, another rocket scientist heard from...

It doesn't take "guts" to commit an act that betrays your family, the laws set forth by society, and ends you up in prison for 20 years. It takes stupidity. Or in her case, mental illness...

Charlie Manson maybe a freak job, but at least he's got flare and panache. Broderick is just an old, sad, ego-maniacal joke...

reply

<LOLOL... Yeah, another rocket scientist heard from...>

LOL, and then you use the same kind of statement to try and make make Broderick no different from Manson. If Manson's behavior is your idea of panache, well, I just don't know what to say. I suppose you're an admirer of Gacy as well. He painted such pretty pictures!

And as it happens, I'm a lawyer, Mr. "Fraud Detective". True, it's not rocket science (at least for me), but then again, I suspect that what you do isn't rocket science either. I suspect you're just someone who uses a misleading user name.


<Broderick is just an old, sad, ego-maniacal joke...>

If you think she's a joke, then you're saying that she's no longer a danger to society, right?






Honour thy parents. They were hip to the groove too once you know.

reply

<And as it happens, I'm a lawyer>

LOLOL... But of course you're a lawyer. It explains why it took you a year and a half to think up such clever response...

<You use the same kind of statement to try and make make Broderick no different from Manson>

Granted, I can understand how two high profile homicide cases can be a vast departure from prosecuting those nail-biting PI claims, as you seek a million for the yuppy who spilt Starbucks in her lap on the way to Pilates.

But if took even a 'little time' to become familiar with the cases upon which you like to render opinions, beyond last night's 'Lifetime - made for TV movie' - you'd understand the distinction between Manson and Broderick.

<If you think she's a joke, then you're saying that she's no longer a danger to society, right?>

Your words, not mine. Manson and Broderick both are exactly where they need to be...

Now go back and think up something really witty and I'll talk to you next year...

reply

I hope her parole appeal will be D.E.N.I.E.D.. I highly doubt she spent enough time to process the horrific crime she perpetrated in 1989 (double homicide). I also doubt she's even remotely remorseful for killing two people, selfishly thrusting her family (primarily the children) into this mayhem of a mess and narcissistically taking advantage of those who exhibited sympathy for her plight as a spurned wife tossed to the curb so that the husband could upgrade to a newer, younger and probably more (emotionally) pliable twit.

Newsflash to Betty: Life is not fair. So what if Dan Broderick gave a new meaning to a term a--hole AND ruthlessly played mind games with her, it was ultimately Betty's responsibility to assess the situation for what it was and accept that if she couldn't get what she was entitled to, she should have sucked it up and moved on. Perhaps the settlement Mr. Broderick offered was pittance in comparison to his actual net worth, it still provided her with enough income/cash to live/maintain upper middle class lifestyle. Heck, she could have easily used the settlement $$ to enter/pay for law school to attain a JD degree and come out debt-free. Instead, she opted to be rigidly principle-oriented self-righteous, remain in some kind of energy-zapping power struggle with a (probably) bigger control freak of a narcissist than her.

Anyone who is experienced knows that winning against a DSM-classified narcissist is not only a time and emotional vampire, it is virtually impossible. The only way to deal with such character is to take what he/she offers and run for life. That is exactly what Betty should have done, as opposed to sinking deeper and deeper into a pit of hell (that is by interacting with Mr. Broderick, which in turn made her crazier.) She could have (better) controlled the situation by refusing to have anything to do with Dan (which includes NO communication- let the lawyers do the talking).

AGAIN: Less interaction with Dan = less of an emotional turmoil, more chances of being in recovery and finally less chances of sinking deeper into depression in which suicide or/and murder appears to make sense, and therefore, is the solution.

Betty needs to remain behind bars.

reply

Very nicely said - and every word true...

reply

She was denied & I am happy she was. She does not deserve to be out. She refuses to admit she did any wrong doing. I think it's safe to say she will die in prison. It gets so old hearing people say oh she has done her time let her out. Quite frankly I don't feel sorry for her. Yes her ex was a scumbag but that does not give her the right to go breaking into his home killing him & his wife. I do not buy that she just snapped. This woman went into a rage when she was served divorce papers & continued till she murdered 2 people she could not stand. She stole her daughters house keys, bought a gun, was doing target practice which tells me she was planning something. I do not buy she was planning to kill herself. She could have handled this so much differently & been a free woman today but instead all she cared about was getting revenge & making her ex suffer. This pity party of her getting the shaft in her divorce has gotten old as well. There have been many other women who have gotten the shaft but you don't see them murdering there ex. Sometimes life stinks but you deal with it & move on. She could have went to school, got a job & made something of herself. Hell she could have gotten herself back into shape, new makeover & hook up with someone younger. She made her choices & now can live with them in prison.

reply

Yeah, thank God she was denied. Wahoo! Too bad the prison system can't permanently throw the keys away.

However, what disturbed me about the parole hearing is the decision-makers were looking to see/hear any remorse for perpetrating such horrific crime. So, if Betty was not as mentally ill and was able to act/play the part of being sorry, shedding crocodile tears, then the parole request would have been approved? Such bullsh-t. My belief is the only way that Betty can leave prison is through a body bag.

Factors such as whether she's remorseful and no longer poses as a risk to society should be IRRELEVANT. Because of her mental defect and determination to control & win, two innocent people were/are buried 6 feet under, becoming worm food. And it's remarkably amazing how some people conveniently forget that. Dead people surely have no voice, *cough cough* meaning no rights.


reply

I agree with the OP. She took away her children's father and killed a woman she barely knew! Whether Dan was completely 'good' (who is anyway?) is irrelevant. No one could ever prove he physically abused her, even the kids said he never did that.
What the fresh hell is wrong with this woman?! She had EVERYTHING! She had 4 wonderful kids, an astonishingly lovely house, a car, her medical insurance paid, all her shopping and all other bills paid, she had loving friends, she was single, Dan was paying her something like $200,000 a year in alimony...a huge sum now...an astronomical amount when this crime occurred!

What more does one person want? Good God almighty!



"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply

Fiatlux, please read the two accounts of the case. You seem to be basing your opinion on the film, which is purely the Broderick clan's version of events.

It's like the film 'Casualties of Love,' which made Joey Buttafuoco look like a saint, instead of the sleazeball he was in real life.

SoCalledFraudDetective is beyond hope. If he were a real detective he'd do his homework.


"Joey, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?"

reply


I don't doubt Mr. Broderick was no angel either. Not many people in a marriage, OR divorce, are 100% innocent.

But the facts that are NOT in dispute are this woman had over $100,000 in alimony per year (!) from him with no quibble, he paid for EVERYTHING (her huge house, health insurance, cars, food, maids (!)), she didn't even work!!!!!
She had beautiful children that she was convicted of terrorizing by destroying his house.
She TOOK their father away! And for what...because she felt humiliated?!
So what? GROW UP, BETTY! You're not the first woman to be slighted by her husband!

Nothing Dan did justified murdering him. She was not in danger for her life.




"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus."
"Didn't he discover America?"
"Penfold, shush."

reply