all 3 were at fault
some are staunch betty supporters, some are staunch dan and linda supporters.....why bother debating? they all acted badly as I said in a post a few years ago. dan was manipulative and deceitful and used linda to taunt betty. linda enjoyed mocking a person she knew was mentally unstable. Sending Betty crinkle cremes and nasty notes was pointless; she already had Dan. Dan must have informed her about Betty driving her car through his front door and ruining his clothes- first by burning them, and then by ruining them with a Boston creme pie. Why would Linda not want to stay away from this woman? What did Linda have to gain from being snide? Dan's encouragement helped fuel the situation. Betty was at fault for hurting her children; they became her pawns and her victims. Dan and Betty fed off each other; they goaded each other ruthlessly and sought revenge at any cost. They both used their children in unspeakable ways. Dan just hired babysitters to take care of the kids and would go on vacations with Linda and leave no money and food in the house.He didnt want to be a full time father; he just didnt want Betty to have the kids. Betty should have listned when her son cried and told her to stop leaving nasty messages on the answering machine. Those were the tears of a hurt child who did not deserve to get caught up in the sick game of the people he loved and who were supposed to love him.
share