MovieChat Forums > Shining Through (1992) Discussion > The book was far far better than the mov...

The book was far far better than the movie...


At least that s what I think. I wonder if there are other people here who have read the book too.

reply

The book is good, especially in Linda's showdown with Margarite. Also the character of Linda makes more sense as someone sent as a spy (older and better trained), then Linda in the movie. I really like both seperately, and the movie is a true guilty pleasure!

reply

although i really enjoyed the book, i loved the movie. in the film, leland doesn't have a son that linda falls in love with. i felt like she didn't love leland till the end in the book, but in the movie, she loved him from the first since there was no other man in linda's life. and it seemed a little ick that linda loves both the father and son in the book.

reply

Hi! this is the first I´ve heard about the film being based on a book! I LOVE this film!!
Is the title "Shining through"? Who is the author??
Hope you can help me!!
Thanx

zavah

reply

I think the writer is Susan Isacks and yes, the title is ''Shining through''...just one detail though - in the book there is no son of Leland, but a doughter, it's with her first husband that Linda falls in love )))




''Is there noone among them you could trust? No man of integrity?''
-''Not that I know of''

reply

The book was way better - much much better plot and the characters are more thought out and have dimensions. In this their motivations are not really clear.

**Twenty Dollars? I wanted a peanut!**

reply

The author's name is spelled Isaacs, Susan Isaacs. She is a famous novelist who lives on Long Island, NY, and wrote many other entertaining books, most of them taking place in todays world.
"Shining through" was her only WW II novel when I remember it right. But it's definitely her best book.
"The magic Hour" is nice, too.

reply

The author of shining through is susan isaacs. Great book!

reply

hey abrooks, john in the book wasn't ed leland's son. he was ed's ex son in law, so it wasn't ick. i liked it better w 2 guys. it shows how she grows up and wants something better.

reply

Have read Shining Through now and I REALLY liked it! Couldn't put it down when I read it.. :-)


reply

Oh, NO!!....He wasn't Leeland's son, but his ex-son-in-law. So no ick-factor at all. Well, not a lot.

I loved the book and that particular plot twist because Linda joined up with the spies, in part, to get away from the memories of her previous love affair (with the son in law), not realizing that Leeland was in love with her all along! He even tried to to sabotage her work to prevent her from going to Germany at one point.

Not until the end of the book does she realize this, thus opening her eyes to the possibility of a true love with Leeland.

reply

I seem to remember from first seeing this film that more is shown concerning Dietrich's feelings for Linda. When I rewatched it now, the last we see of him is his taking out a pistol, on which Linda flees the house in Potsdam. But he has been truly kind to her and seems to be falling in love with her, even though he susepcts her of being sent out by the Gestapo to check whether he is a devout Nazi or not.

So what does he intend to do with that pistol? Kill himself before the Gestapo comes, as he's let a spy come across secret documents? How is this relationship described in the novel? Is it the innate "goodness" of Liam Neeson that shines through, but with no foundation in the novel?

Elisabet

reply

99/100 I think the book is better...this is one of the rare times when I think the movie is actually better.

Pure fluff, but I love it.

reply

hope you are kiddin!

reply

I will go right our and buy the book.
I always prefer to read the book over just seeing the movie
with the exception of the divinci code (sp??sorry) it was way to much like the book, mix it up alittle please

reply

I own the book and have read it at least half a dozen times...love it! Just pure escapism. I still like the film though, I like what they did with it but it isn't what Susan Isaacs probably had in mind! I wonder what sort of film it could have been had they put in Gladys and John.

reply

I loved the book by Susan Isaacs, especially the character of Leland, who was portrayed as very mysterious, idiosyncratic, and charismatic. It has been years since I read it, but I seem to remember a lot of the signature Susan Isaacs humor as well. That said, I also loved the movie, particularly the framing device: It had me from Hello. A movie that has everything: romance, Adventure, Intrigue, family context, suspense, and heart.

reply

What I liked so much better about the movie is the fact that Linda Voss goes to Germany much sooner. In the book she doesn't leave before page 300 (out of only 400 pages). So people who watch the movie first and THEN read the novel, might get restless.
The book has a wonderful sense of humor, but I wish Linda would go to Berlin on page 100 and we would read more about her life in Nazi Germany. Or that the book would be at least 600 to 700 pages long.
Fortunately director David Seltzer thought the same and created a much more thrilling movie that way by letting Linda fly to Berlin within 40 minutes.
Ergo: a book is not always better than the movie based on the book.

reply

Shining Through was a very good book by Susan Isaacs. The movie was okay also.

reply