MovieChat Forums > Honeymoon in Vegas (1992) Discussion > It would have been better without James ...

It would have been better without James Caan.


He was just creepy. Who would have been better? Maybe Redford?

reply

I think they had to make that role a bit creepy, otherwise it would be a no-brainer for Betsy to choose him. Robert Redford... wasn't he the guy in the similar role in 'Indecent Proposal'? Or is that your point, that the movies are so similar? They kind of are, although IP is more of a drama, with 'Honeymoon in Vegas' being a comedy.

Who else could have done the role but less creepy? Hmm, Ted Danson, Jeff Bridges, Michael Keaton? I'm trying to think of actors that aren't overly handsome but attractive enough to make the storyline believable.




You don't choose the soy sauce, the soy sauce chooses you.

reply

Blasphemy. Everything's better with James Caan.

reply

Absolutely: He's a Caan artist!

reply

Blasphemy. Everything's better with James Caan.


This. He's awesome.

"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens😬

reply

[deleted]