Gladiator (1992) v Gladiator (2000)
discuss
shareI think the Ridley Scott took way too many liberties with the re-make. I would usually allow for artistic license, but he went too far.
MovieChat Forums > Gladiator (1992) Discussion > Gladiator (1992) v Gladiator (2000)
This argument makes NO sense; the two films have nothing in common, other than the title. It's like comparing Camel cigarettes to camels in the desert.
"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics...'
I don't know "Camels in the desert" had a terrific score, and solid acting. Hard to choose b/w the two.
shareI don't know, "Camels in the desert had a terrific score, and solid acting." Hard to choose b/w the two.
sharei prefer 1992 of the same titled different movies
shareOriginal is always better. I mean, I like both of these very different films; however, '92 Gladiator is just a tad cooler and more re-watchable.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!
The tiger looked fake in the 2000 version.
I shall call him Squishy and he shall be mine and he shall be my Squishy.