MovieChat Forums > Batman Returns (1992) Discussion > BATMAN RETURNS 25 YEARS LATER: STYLE OVE...

BATMAN RETURNS 25 YEARS LATER: STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE?


http://nerdist.com/batman-returns-25th-anniversary-style-substance/

Unbelievably, it’s been 25 years since Tim Burton‘s Gothic melodrama-disguised-as-a-superhero-movie hit our screens. Batman Returns was the eagerly awaited sequel to Burton’s game changing blockbuster, Batman. Though well received at the time and later a bonafide cult classic, in the decades since its release, Returns has often been seen as lacking in comparison to the dark and subtle surrealism of Burton’s first foray into Bat-lore.

With Batman, Tim Burton brought to the screen a film that had been a decade in the making and changed the face of cinema all together. With its distinct visual flair, unexpected lead in Michael Keaton, and Jack Nicholson‘s star turn as the Joker, 1989’s Batman broke box office records and ushered in an age of branded merchandising that’s still with us to this day. After the immense success of the first film, a second was quickly greenlit and Burton was given free reign to create his unbridled vision of Gotham.

Batman Returns is a sumptuous feast of a movie, with dazzling set design and incredibly detailed costumes by Colleen Atwood alongside state of the art special effects. This Gotham is so expansive and expressive that it becomes a character within the movie, as it has always been in the source material. In a medium such as film, it could almost consume the story itself, yet its inhabitants never allow that to happen. Although Batman Returns is beloved for darkly stylized over the top visuals, the cast never let the setting shine more than themselves, often almost seeming to work in collaboration with the unbelievable world they inhabit to create truly memorable moments.

reply

So youre just spamming the boards then?

reply

I always thought the film was more style over substance. Visually it is a very entertaining film, but the script is weak. I'm well aware of the flaws of this film. I know it's to a perfect movie by any stretch of the imagination. However I can still be entertained by it when watch the movie. It has grown on me over time.

reply

The wonderful visual aspects of the movie of course stand out, but overall I think BR has some depth to offer (Bruce and Selina's scenes in the third act are powerful). So to me this has always been a great sequel, as well as one of the best comic book movies.

reply

A 25 year retrospective: The lasting impact of Batman Returns

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/6hfwon/a_25_year_retrospective_the_lasting_impact_of/

http://www.criticalhit.net/entertainment/25-year-retrospective-lasting-impact-batman-returns/

reply

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/13096964-post59.html

Outside of Catwoman, I don't like much of Batman Returns. Tim Burton thought he was making an arthouse film and started pulling in many elements that really have nothing to do with Batman as a character. It's apparent the studio had reined Burton in on Batman and with its success gave him carte blanche on the sequel.

Everyone should be very thankful he never got to make that Superman he wanted.

reply

It was pretty a Tim Burton film with a stock Tim Burton look with stock Tim Burton characters with Batman names in a movie featuring a stock Tim Burton plot.

reply

And this is your stock post.

reply

Batman Returns is the downside of when you let an auteur (especially if they really don't have much affinity for the title character or even the source material) direct a superhero movie instead of something decidedly more producer driven like the more modern Marvel Cinematic Universe. Burton let his imagination run amok at the behest of telling a coherent story and developing Bruce Wayne (it's quite obvious that Burton was more attracted to the grotesqueness of the villains and Batman is the least interesting character to him) beyond just a two-dimensional personality.

reply

The studio did make a fatal error of giving him full control which lead to the series taking a different direction, it's always best to make a movie based on source material that you care about.

reply

It's an extremely stylized and unrealistic film, yet there's a solid core of emotion that makes the surreal Gotham City we see seem to be jnhabited by real people.

I give most of the credit to Pfeiffer and Keaton. If they hadn't been so good, the film would have nothing but the visuals to give it interest.

reply