Slacker vs. Clerks


Slacker versus Clerks, which is better.

My personal vote goes to Slacker, but what do all you think?

reply

clerks- A-
slacker- D+

one is a coherent, funny, and experimental film.
the other is an incoherent, boring, and experimental film.

whos the better filmmaker overall? well linklater easily, because he only went uphill after slacker. smith made a couple of good movies afterwards, but nothing too special...

reply


Good point about the directors of the two films suckerdwsp316.
Linklater definately got better while Smith just toyed around with bigger budgets but didn't really advance anywhere.

_________________________
Fear&Loathing&Fear&http://timewarp-tshirts.com

reply

Completely agree!

reply

thanks!

reply

Slacker.

I hated Clerks.

reply

i think clerks was the better film, but i adore slacker.







"Now I know I'm always right; that's a thought that never even crossed my mind..."

reply

You cant hate Clerks.
But yeah, it shows strong similarities to Slacker.

But Clerks is like Slacker x 10.

"....All Jedi had was a bunch of muppets."

reply

Clerks is my favorite, although Slacker is also wonderful, and deserves credit just on the basis for inspiring Kevin Smith to make Clerks in the first place.
---
#1 Wee Man Fan

reply

slacker

clerks is an overrated piece of *beep*

reply

I love both, but Slacker is better...

"Hello, I am Dennis Hopper."- Dennis Hopper

reply

Enjoyed both, like Slackers better.

Both films are about equal in quality of dialogue in my opinion. I like the Linklater style over the Smith style of directing.

reply

Clerks.

reply

[deleted]

Clerks. Slacker was okay, Clerks takes the cake.

reply

Clerks 5 words JAY AND SILENT BOB BIOTCH!

reply

quiet cookie,

more like Dante Hicks and Randoll Graves

reply

Slackers WAS the movie that motivated Kevin Smith into going into filmmaking. He states it in his online blog on viewaskew.com. I haven't seen Slackers in its entirety (actually watching it right now). I saw parts of it before, but I'm finishing it now. I personally LOVE Clerks though, and Kevin Smith.

reply

I'm a Clerks man, myself, but Slacker is a pretty sweet flick. The only problem that Slacker has is that it really just rambles without giving us enough moments of kick to keep me entertained. I know the point is that its all these real people and stuff and I get that, but Clerks avoids this pitfall. There are long stretches of dry, dialogue driven humor in Clerks. But every once and a while he punches it up with something like the masturbating old man, jay and bob with Berserker, etc. But that's just me...


Today I passed by a mirror. Now there's a reliable disappointment.

reply

SLACKER

"Around, I'll be around." -Detective Somerset, Se7en

reply

Clerks, though Slacker was good, too. I think that Clerks just had more to it.

Savvy

reply

Clerks was a lot easier to identify with, being that I have worked in customer service. Plus the way Randal and Dante talk about subjects like Star Wars and 'jizz moppers' and things like that make it more realistic for me then Slackers was. BUT in all fairness I have only seen Slackers once back in 93 and I watch Clerks, sadly, a lot.

reply

Clerks. I saw it first, and it's been a fave of mine for going on six years now. I just saw Slacker for the first time, which I liked a lot, but Clerks has the place in my heart.

reply

[deleted]

slacker definitely, its way more inovative p.s. kevin smith is a fat dumpy troll











reply

It's hard to say. Clerks is more conventional because it has main characters while Slacker has none and moves from potential main character to another.

reply

[deleted]

you're kind of comparing apples and oranges, even though yes kevin smith was inspired to make clerks from viewing slackers. but if i have to give a response i would say clerks...it is easier to identify with and is a smart comedy. i don't care what anybody says to knock it. the first and only time i saw slackers was about 10 to 11 years ago when i was still a teenager, and i knew i was viewing something special and "different" per se but it was trying a little too hard. i think i also needed to give it a few years, maybe not see it until my early twenties. i would like to go back to it now being in my late twenties and see what i take from it at this point in life.

reply

clerks is the one pal.....

btw slacker is a kinda film that is mostly relates to the people living in and around texas.........

but clerks is tremendously comic on one side and on the other side , involves some serious characters to check out....

reply

Clerks

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Kevin Smith inspired to make Clerks after watching Slackers because he thought it was terrible, and he thought he could make a far better film?

Slackers just rambles. Boring. Just like Waking Life. It's not fun to watch because it's pedantic bull****.

reply

I think you are wrong. Kevin Smith made Clerks because he was inspired by Slackers, not because he thought he could do better.

For me Slackers is the better film because it rambles, sometimes incoherently, but in a melancholic, disconnected sort of way. Isn't that what life is mostly like? In Austin Texas, especially?! ;-)

It's all about the town and its influence on the people. Something I find brilliant. Clerks is great fun, but not quite so deep. Even though Clerks has many great lines, Slacker has slightly better ones, "This is a message to the underpaid workers of America. Every single commodity you produce is a piece of your own death!" The list of character names at the end is genius in itself.

reply

Slacker.

Basically two films based on conversations and monologues; "Slacker's" seem much more sincere (One of the great lines: "I've got band practice in like...five hours from now, so I thought I'd be moseying along."), it relies more on nuance than explicit profanity to convey the slacker ethos. Of the two, "Clerks" seems much more nihilistic, something I suppose a lot of people relate too, sadly.

I really don't like Kevin Smith, he's just a dumbed down version of Linklater, and his die-hard fan-base who consistently deify his s***ty flicks are mostly idiotic and annoying. (Take offense if you consider yourself either idiotic or annoying.)

***

On a side note, someone above mentioned "Clerks" being an experimental film: being trapped in an environment for the entirety of a film is not only a lame allegory but a gimmick, albeit of necessity due to the low budget production--not an experiment (it's a sitcom cliche, for christ's sakes). "Slacker" on the other hand does have an experimental narrative, fluctuating between "protagonists" into almost like a "stream of collective consciousness"--it kind of perpetuates Hitchcock's sentiment in "Psycho" (without the sinister undertones of course).

________
The culture war is like a bar fight--and I'm your broken pool cue!
-Stephen Colbert

reply

[deleted]