Bad Film?


Ok, this film shows an interesting structure, but it is pretty bad. The acting is less than average.

reply

[deleted]

well perhaps - but i adored the Drak character --- he's rad!

reply

It's not as good as the original, but it is still an enjoyable flick..

reply

Please, give me a break. An "enjoyable flick" this as to be one of the worst movies i've seen, and i've seen alot of crap.
Stick with the 1st one, don't waste any time with this one.

reply

[deleted]

It's an enjoyable B-movie with some above average FX. Sure the acting's not great, but does anybody watch a movie like this for the acting? My only real complaint is that the pacing in the middle section is a bit sluggish.

reply

[deleted]

Not a "bad" film by any means, the acting is subpar but it's never boring to watch or hindered by terrible dialogue. There are much worse films than this.

reply

I don't think it's a bad film at all, definately not a B-movie. As sequels go, it's very entertaining. The charecters are interesting and the plot isn't just a rehash of the originals, unlike so many sequels.

reply

I thought the movie was good for what it was,especially for what I'd guess was EXTREMELY low budget stuff

reply

Yeah this went straight to vhs. I the acting is pretty good, considering.

reply