A SCHLOCK MASTERPIECE!!!


This film is SO BAD that it is AWESOME! What a great little Canadian disasterpiece...Does anyone else agree?

reply

i agree, the guy who gave it a bad revieq is a f u c k head. he doesnt have a sense of humor at all.

reply

"THE" guy? EVERYONE gave it a bad review, but I'm am glad someone else loves this crazy Canadian flick...I mean, Craig Pryce wasn't trying to make "Citizen Kane II: Radioactive Kane", he was just trying to do a funny/cheesy/low budget comedy/horror film. And I for one think he more than succeded at that. WELL worth the $3 dollars I paid for a used copy at my local video store.

Say NO to censorship!!!

reply

Goddamit what do they think they'll see in a movie called Revenge of the radioactive reporter?
I give this movie 8/10 for it's trash value.
Well I'm glad to see there are other people who share my opinion.
It is not easy to make a good trash movie. You've got to have some damn good sense of humor.

reply

Oh by the way check out the other reviews for movies by the as*hole who wrote review for Radioactive reporter...
I value his opinion even more now.

reply

Oh man I just stumbled across this while looking for something else. This movie was terrible but in a good cheesy way. I miss the good old days of video rentals. If I had the money I spent renting movies right now, well.. that would be a lot of money.

The one scene that cracked me up was when he goes into that woman's bathroom while she's in the tub and urinates into the water causing her to burn like she was in acid. Too bad that scene was cut short. The ending sucked but I still enjoyed the movie.

8.5/10 on the so-bad-it's-good scale.

Long live the 70's!

reply

I first rented this movie in 1990 from a small mom and pop store and loved it, and then told other people about the movie, but no one carried it in there store.

it's a wild movie for sure.

reply