Rating.


Is the 18 (uk) rating for this film justified, I am 16 and was wondering how bad it really is. I've seen Mysterious skin, more disturbing or less?


reply

No, the 18 rating is not justified. Poison is a very beautiful and strange movie in every aspect and has been haunting me in a very positive way since I first saw it on the TV very late at night when I was 12-13 years old.

reply

So basically you had no business whatching it when you did either.

Where are peoples parents these days seriously. Some things are just not ment to be experienced by younger viers thats why we have a ratings system.

reply

Ratings systems are just supposed to serve as a guide--they're not supposed to be followed as if they were law. Many countries around the world have a much more lax attitude towards sex and eroticism on screen (and a less permissive attitude towards violence), which results in much different ratings than in the US. Also, in many of those countries nobody checks your age when you enter a movie theater, even if you're a teenager going there by yourself. And guess what? The vast majority of people in those countries don't turn out to be perverts (just like the vast majority of people in the US don't turn out to be sexually repressed). Let's not put too much faith in the movie ratings system, shall we?

reply

The oint was which you obviously missed was that they are infact there for a reason and 12 year olds and people whom are to young to comprehend the things that go on in some of these movies should not be expposed to said elements especially gang prison rape. Theres no one that liberal that they can't comprehend that. I mean do you recreationally buy porn for your neices and nephews....I would hope not. theres a purpouse to that.

reply

red herring..this isnt porn.

reply

Oh why becuase porn has no plot and is constructed of only scenes of sex its some how different in content then a movie in which the plot revolves around a sexual act of a violent nature? Please sit down that is stupid and you just are arguing to get the last word in at this point.

reply

I would have no problem with my 12 year old watching a film such as "The Lover," with it's explicit love scenes and nudity. In fact here in Germany it is rated for 12 years. However i don't think i would want to expose someone so young to a film like "Poison," because of it's violent sexuality, and disturbing imagery. This is a good film, but if I had seen this at age 12 i think I would have been a bit scared and sickened by it.

reply

Point blank is a child should not be exposed to things of a sexual nature. Would you allow your 12 year old child to engage in recreational sex? no you wouldnt so why would you expose them to sexual images. It doesn't make any sence.

reply

"Would you allow your 12 year old child to engage in recreational sex?"

Sorry to say, I think many 12 year olds do experiment with sex, and I think it's natural, providing they are experimenting with other 12 year olds. 12 is when the body starts to change, breasts, pubic hair, etc.. Along with those physical changes come the sexual feelings as well. People who believe that 12 year olds are not sexual are in denial about human nature. And the worst thing to do to a child is teach them that there is something wrong with their sexual feelings, or that their maturing bodies are somehow dirty, or "evil." Let nature take it's course. If people want their kids to stay "pure and innocent" forever, then they should just buy dolls. I would however, fanatically protect my young kids from violent images, such as films like Hostel, and even many video games.

reply

And? many kids younger then that experiment with sex. , What your talking about has nothing to do with the subject. That doesn't mean you should indulge in it by taking it apon your your self to expose them to sexual imagery ment for a much older audience like in this film. The fact of the matter is you shouldn't have a hand in the exposing your child to unregulated sexual imagery especially of a graphic content becuase they aren't old enough to under stand the ramifacation of that and its neglegent on the part of the elder gaurdian.

And thats has ntohign to do with you ALLOWING your child to partake in adult behavior as a child such as recreational sex.

reply

hdamballa, quit being an idiot. People like you are what's wrong with America, people who think they have the right to enforce their standards on others, who think the rating system is 100% fail safe and should be followed. The fact is there will never be a film rated NC-17 or R that people under the reccomended age can't handle. There will always be 13 year olds and 15 year olds who can handle these type of films, which is why ratings work as nothing more then a guideline and should not be taken as gospel.


"In America, it's okay to watch Jimmy get his head blown off as long as he's not giving head"

reply

Your an idiot, your one of those dumbass whos convictions on the subject of censoriship are derrived from being pissed about not being able to see tits when you watch american pie on tbs, dumbass. Your basically saying consentual sex between a minor and adult is ok if the minor is what you deem mentally mature enough to engage in said behavior and that some how would make the experience less innapropriate, thats the same basic principal,idiot. If you have that point of view you mind as well say anybody whom you deem is responsible enough to handle lets say driving a vehicle should be allowed to do so because the minor seems like a smart enough individual to handle the responsibility, the guidlines are there for a reason idiot.

There something to be said about a supposed adult that doesn't have the mental capacity to think in terms of a child's logic about what themes can or cant be properly processed, at that age. Dont ahve any kids.

reply

no i think your the one who shouldn't "ahve" kids.. i'm assuming hdamballa is of an older generation with archiac notions of reality

reply

Yeah becuase a typo some how makes you less of a juvenile jackass and my argument less relevant. You wouldn't even have a retort if I hadn't been typing too fast, says a lot, idiot.

reply

hmmm, name calling is so mature..that says a lot..in addition your "argument" is weak..keep trying though, it's kinda cute

reply

I saw nothing graphic in the DVD. I did doze off several times particularly during the boring prison segments so it's possible I missed something.



~ Observe, and act with clarity. ~

reply

Yes, it has the power of changing you but it can also be a kind of traumatic experience if you aren't prepared, much like Genet's novels.

reply