horrible casting


All I have to say is Christian Slater as lucky luciano. Slater looks about as much like Luciano as he looks like michael jordan.

reply

So do you look like Michael Jordan?

reply

Maybe he doesn't, but it's true. Lucky Luciano was... how shall I put this... well, with no offense meant to the man, rather homely. He had peeling skin, a scarred up face, and his right eye only opened part-way (I believe from one of his scars, but don't quote me on it). Many of his contemporaries, though never to his face, likened him to a lizard.

reply

I agree they could of done better casting.But the story was still good

reply

Actually, judging from the photograph at www.crimelibrary.com, young Luciano was not that bad looking. He got the drooping eye from the knife wound to his cheek in 1929 (the Staten Island incident in the film).

And does it really matter if Slater looked nothing like him? DeCaprio certainly looks nothing like a young Howard Hughes (ref. "The Aviator"). And no one wants to see a film where the "hero" (although in this case I believe "protagonist" is a better word.) is completely unattractive. It's not like they were making a documentary.

I thoroughly enjoyed this film. I'll admit to being something of a Christian Slater fan, but all in all, I very much enjoyed it.

reply

In agreement 100%

reply

I agree. I'm watching this movie right now on cable. I started watching it in the middle, and I had assumed from the start that Slater played a detective fighting against Luciano. I was really shocked when I looked on this page and saw that he plays Luciano.

Wasn't Luciano actually from Italy? Slater doesn't look very Italian.

reply

yea luciano was sicilian.the guy playing lansky isnt that convincing from the documentaries that ive seen either.hes all aggressive, not as soft spoken. and they keep calling the other neighborhood don FARenzano, his real name was maranzano. thats overlookable though.

reply

[deleted]

i didnt think it was that bad, however i thought Slater was a bit soft playing Luciano.

reply

I agree completely. These guy were totally unbelievable in these roles.

reply

Yeah, with better casting, this movie coulda been epic.

reply

The casting was down right terrible. I mean come on, a Mexican and an Irishman as Italian mob bosses. not buying it

reply

Who cares what the actors' ethnicities were? Unless you are racist, it shouldn't matter. What matters is their personality traits and believability of them playing the actors. And unless you knew Luciano, Lansky, Sigel or Costello you shouldn't speak of the actors' precise portrayal of them. So what, and Irish or Mexican playing a role where the ethnicity is something different...who cares, that is a racist comment if I ever heard one before. Does Robert De Niro look like Al Capone? Not at all...but he did a wonderful acting job in The Untouchables so who cares if he looks like him or not? Does Jamie Foxx look like Ray Charles? Not really (there are probably hundreds of more examples)... If the casting in biographical films was done completely by selecting actors who most resembeled the real life persons involved, we would be watching films with sub-par to horrible acting 75% of the time and you'd have wished that they took actors who looked nothing like the character they are playing.

reply

Would Anthony Quinn play a better Luciano? He plays Neil Dellacroce and Joe Maserria in Mobsters (both Italian mobsters). How come no one comments about his differing ethnicity? He has one Mexican parent and one Irish parent. People need to stop worrying about races and ethnicities on these boards and see the acting.

reply

Wait so what are u saying that A black man should have played Lucky Luciano? I'm not racist but it does matter. Christian Slatter was horrible! Patrick Dempsey wasn't that bad because he was alright as Meyer Lansky (the smart jew who never spent a day in prison) but someone should have told him to watch Hymon Roth (in The Godfather Part3). But whatever. Bad acting from most of the cast. Bad directing but "GOOD SCREENPLAY".

reply

I think that Luciano should have at least had an Italian accent, since he immigrated from Sicily.

FYI, Roth was in Godfather II.

reply

anybody here thinks F.M.Abraham was awsome? Well,to satisfy your 'race Q&A',
he's Italian/Syrian playin a Jew? Problem?

reply

schmitzova,

I started watching this movie on cable, but apparently came in after F. Murray Abraham's character was out of the picture so to speak. That's too bad, because I'm a big fan.
True, F. Murray Abraham is half Syrian, half Italian. However, the overwhelming majority of the characters that he's played on TV and in film have been Jewish.
I remember seeing an interview with him once where he was talking about his life growing up, and that people always assumed that he was Jewish. They would make unkind jokes about Arabs to him, due to the conflict between Israel and the Arab nations surrounding it. He would tell them, "Actually, my Dad is Arab." They'd appologize, and start making Anti-Semtic jokes instead, and he'd have to say, "No, I don't really think that's funny either. Alot of my friends & neighbors are Jewish." He said that incidents like that gave him a great deal of insight into human nature.

reply

[deleted]

A rather lame comment because you're not going to find actors who look like the real characters who'll draw an audience. Look as St. Valentine's Day Massacre - Jason Robards as Al Capone? Warren Beatty as Bugsy Siegel? I'm sure none of them look anything like the real mobsters they portray, but that's just part of movies.

reply

you might not find actors that actually look the part, but it might be nice to find some that can ACT the part. I just saw this laughable movie last night. It looked like a bunch of young, bad actors, trying their best to imitate DiNero and Pacino. It had the campy feel of gangster flick produced by Lifetime Television. This movie sucks.

reply