Their heart wasn't in it.
Maybe socialist ideology never got hold because of the committee on un-American activities and other such successful programs to stomp out communism.
With the testimony from ex-KGB and such, we now know for a FACT that the commies were trying to instill their way of thinking through Hollywood. It is called propaganda. We tried to do the same to them and others. When they caught ours they shot them. We had a harder time stopping it over here because of the almost total lack of help from Hollywood. Hollywood has always been liberals and queers, no[w] that their sacred communism is dead they jump onto the democratic party which is worse. At least the commies came right out and said what they stood for and what they were trying to accomplish. I think that we need to have another committee on un-American activities and have them stomp out the liberals, fags and democrats
I think that there are lots of people who can agree with about 2/3 of that.
Putting aside the economic woes of the 1930s for a moment, and the people in this movie who were concerned about those, there was another class of people in the US then who were not concerned with either, but were fascinated by the emerging totalinarianism in Europe: Stalin in Russia, Mussolini in Italy, Hitler in Germany. (Google "henry ford hitler" just for a small sample. Also, remember FDR and his reverence for "Uncle Joe" Stalin and his willingness to do anything to shore up the viciously totalinarian USSR, even before Germany became a threat.) "Just think," they would say, "an end to the endless debate, vote, debate, and vote again system with it's ridiculous trial by jury judicial system where important decisions are put into the hand of pigs. And we can finally be rid if the filthy Jews." (Some of the people saying that were from Jewish families. The whole idea of all of this was the elimination of political competition, wherever it would come from.)
The HUAC was a bit of theater designed to make the people of the US (and the world) think that something was being done to eliminate a threat. Hollywood had (and has) its commies, who were relatively small people who were also admirers of the totalitarian systems, but who failed to jump on the real bandwagon: the fabled one-world system. Ever wonder why the placeholder Bush invaded Iraq? (Do you think it was for the oil? Do you really think that they care whether you can run your Saturn back and forth to work or not? No, the big guys will always have enough oil to run their armored limos.) It's because the one-world system is chipping away slowly at the recalcitrant regimes. What better place to chip away but at a pompous ass like Sadam with a country full of recalcitrant religious zealots (They really don't get it, do they?) while the US is lowered economically in the process, making it a better match to join up with the rest of the world. Trouble is, Europe seems to be in some kind of ascendency. There's still time to do something about that, coming up.
Oh, what happened to Hitler if the one-world group likes totalinarianism? He failed to joing the Moscow-Paris-London-Washington axis, obviously. He got a little bit independent, something like Sadam, refused to be hemmed in by his own borders, and paid the price for it.
The one-world conspiracy theory again? What better fits the evidence?
reply
share