MovieChat Forums > Defending Your Life (1991) Discussion > wouldn't she have been pregnant?

wouldn't she have been pregnant?


If her daughter was born on June what12? 1991, and the movie was released march 1991, wouldn't Meryl be pregnant in the movie? I mean wouldn't she be showing?. Because she would have been 6 months pregnant.

reply

I answered this on the Meryl Streep board. Shees. Give someone a chance to answer you.

...a signature to be named later.

reply

Okay, you've never been pregnant have you, cause I just had a baby and I didn't really show till I was in my sixth month...thats when the baby really starts to grow. And not all pregnant women get big even at the end.

"All my friends are dead
All my friends are dead"
Turbonegro

reply

You can see the beginnings of a bump at parts of the movie.

reply

Just because a movie is released on a certain date, does not mean that is when it finished filming. Many times post-production can last months.

reply



Considering i'm 16....no...I have not had a baby. "Well, what is it? A viral love? Kind of a 24-hour thing?"

reply

Okay, you've never been pregnant have you, cause I just had a baby and I didn't really show till I was in my sixth month...thats when the baby really starts to grow.

So it would be inconceivable that the movie was filmed much earlier than the actual release date? 

reply

To answer your very old question. This film wrapped six months before she got pregnant.

You are literally too stupid to insult.

reply