MovieChat Forums > Beauty and the Beast (1991) Discussion > Does anyone feel the alternate opening w...

Does anyone feel the alternate opening was better...?


I actually thought it was much funnier and better set-up, since the Beast is not mentioned at all in the intro (until the father stumbles into the castle) which gives it a sense of mystery. The whole sequence where Belle's father and the horse enter the castle was so much fun. After watching it, I think the first 10 minutes of the film were rather conventional.

reply

No, I think the actual opening is amazing, probably the best opening of a Disney movie ever. Such beautiful music and animation.

reply

The actual opening is great. I agree with you.

"What do you mean "parodies are exempt" from copyright law?"-J.R.R. Tolkien

reply

I think the TC's referring to the opening, as in, the scene right AFTER the opening title (Little Town, or Belle if you will), not the opening as in the opening narration explaining how Beast got cursed.

I can't speak for which was better since I haven't even seen the alternate opening and don't even know what it's like (in fact, I hadn't even heard of there being an alternate opening for this version of the film. I HAVE heard of the Jim Cox and Richard Purdum versions, though).

reply

I haven't watched the alternate opening, but what is wrong with the opening with the prologue in which David Ogen Steirs narrating, I like the opening that we have it, and we get the Beast's story and we know why he acts like he is, and I couldn't imagine the movie without it.

reply

I haven't watched the alternate opening, but what is wrong with the opening with the prologue in which David Ogen Steirs narrating, I like the opening that we have it, and we get the Beast's story and we know why he acts like he is, and I couldn't imagine the movie without it.

The opening in the actual film feels so banal and uninspired. I could somehow go pass the opening 3-minute prologue as 'necessary evil', but once the animation starts it does not improve, either - we have a song where they basically sing "Here is Belle. She likes to read. She lives in this town". I mean, what? I get the feeling they just placed a very lazy intro there, with very little imagination. It doesn't pick up until Belle gets into the castle.

reply

Well, I do have to agree with you on one thing: The opening song at least WAS pretty badly handled. They could have used that time making the village to actually EXPLAIN why Belle moved to the village, and not just mention off-handedly that she moved the village some time prior (and it's not even clear exactly when she moved to the village). Not to mention, Belle's complaints about the village were pretty poor, and if anything made her look more like an arrogant snob, since the things she was complaining about were it being provincial and full of "little people." And they should have given Gaston more of a motivation than simply because she's the "most beautiful woman in the village" when the mere existence of those triplets flat out conflicted with that view. Oh, and actually elaborate more on WHY Belle hated being at the village, since there's almost nothing in there worth complaining about (and even the villagers' lyrics didn't exactly indicate they held Belle with any ill will, and other than acknowledging she's somewhat odd, they really don't do anything bad to her, Gaston aside). We can't even say she was financially poor or that that was the reason why she moved to the village, considering she was able to afford the time to read books, which even back in pre-Revolution France, middle class people, while undeniably literate for the most part thanks to the printing press a couple of centuries back, would not have been able to afford the time to read since they are in many instances trying to work their backs off on various jobs trying to eat, and the only time they might afford reading anything, it's spent on the Bible or the Catechism.

reply

I love the actual opening, I think it's one of the most beautiful openings to a movie ever.
And the song is there to explain who Belle is and what kind of town it is.

reply

Well, I do have to agree with you on one thing: The opening song at least WAS pretty badly handled. They could have used that time making the village to actually EXPLAIN why Belle moved to the village, and not just mention off-handedly that she moved the village some time prior (and it's not even clear exactly when she moved to the village). Not to mention, Belle's complaints about the village were pretty poor, and if anything made her look more like an arrogant snob, since the things she was complaining about were it being provincial and full of "little people." And they should have given Gaston more of a motivation than simply because she's the "most beautiful woman in the village" when the mere existence of those triplets flat out conflicted with that view. Oh, and actually elaborate more on WHY Belle hated being at the village, since there's almost nothing in there worth complaining about (and even the villagers' lyrics didn't exactly indicate they held Belle with any ill will, and other than acknowledging she's somewhat odd, they really don't do anything bad to her, Gaston aside). We can't even say she was financially poor or that that was the reason why she moved to the village, considering she was able to afford the time to read books, which even back in pre-Revolution France, middle class people, while undeniably literate for the most part thanks to the printing press a couple of centuries back, would not have been able to afford the time to read since they are in many instances trying to work their backs off on various jobs trying to eat, and the only time they might afford reading anything, it's spent on the Bible or the Catechism.

Eh... I'm afraid I can only agree with you on two things.

1: It would have been nice to know more about Belle's back-story (as in, when and why did she and Maurice move to the village).

2: The bimbettes are more beautiful than Belle (even though Belle is my favorite Disney princess, I find it weird that a whole village would see her as an unparallelled beauty).

The rest of your post is just bull**** though.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

Maybe it is, but could they at least try to have Belle NOT emphasize that it was provincial in a way that made pretty clear she hated it? Not to mention the bit where she called them "little people" right at the beginning of the song. I'm sorry, but my idea of a pure of heart character (which Belle was supposed to be) would behave more like, I don't know, Terra Branford from Final Fantasy VI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UstFWEOt28Y; http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Terra_Branford; And honestly, if they do have to have her complain about the village, at least give a reason why that DOESN'T involve her viewing the village as provincial or the villagers as little people. Like, I don't know, maybe depict it as a wretched hive of scum and villainy like Gotham.

Sorry, but I have major issues with the opening song and how it, well, it really seemed to have Belle really seem like she had really... well, petty problems with the village (especially when the villagers' comments about Belle weren't even all THAT bad, as I've seen worse insults to Meg on Family Guy than the stuff the villagers stated about Belle. Heck, she was treated nicely by the villagers compared to her father, who most of them mercilessly belittled.).

reply

While we don't know much about Belle's background, we still know one thing from a line in that song: she and her had not always lived in that village. It is very possible that Belle and Maurice had come there from a big city (maybe even Paris), where life had been very much different. It is also possible that they originally had belonged to a higher social class than the villagers. And whether you like it or not, a middle class girl from a big city would hardly connect with the working class people in a small village...

And I don't agree that their insults were that harmless either. They were basically saying that Belle was a lunatic, because of the horrible sin of... reading books. I'm sorry, but I can't share your sympathy for the villagers. Or for that matter, your disdain for Belle.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

I realize this is well over several months old, but I might as well respond to this.

While we don't know much about Belle's background, we still know one thing from a line in that song: she and her had not always lived in that village. It is very possible that Belle and Maurice had come there from a big city (maybe even Paris), where life had been very much different. It is also possible that they originally had belonged to a higher social class than the villagers. And whether you like it or not, a middle class girl from a big city would hardly connect with the working class people in a small village...


To some extent, she still does. After all, she seemed to be able to afford the luxury of having free time to read, which is something the villagers could only hope for. Compare that to, say, the triplets, who are working as waitresses just to make ends meet.

And I don't agree that their insults were that harmless either. They were basically saying that Belle was a lunatic, because of the horrible sin of... reading books. I'm sorry, but I can't share your sympathy for the villagers. Or for that matter, your disdain for Belle.


They never called her a lunatic until the ending (and even then, only Gaston said she was crazy, not the other villagers). Before then, they at best considered her slightly odd (which really isn't all that insulting. Heck, if people thought I was somewhat odd, I'd take it with stride since let's face it, being diagnosed with Aspergers does make me odd, even though I do try not to let it control my life). Now, if the villagers explicitly treated her like most of Quahog town treated Meg Griffin from that awful show Family Guy, or even how Springfield treated Bart in that infamous Simpsons episode Boys of Bummer, then we're talking regarding genuinely cruel treatment of Belle. The closest that the villagers have ever gotten to being downright nasty towards either Belle herself or anyone connected to her in some way was with her father, now THAT one they definitely were nasty, and I don't sympathize with them there.

And I don't have disdain for Belle, to be honest. Actually, even now, I still like her more than the triplets, and if anything, I actually do feel some pain regarding having to go against her. But my trust in her was broken. And it came from several factors. One, there was the fact that, during the time period the film took place in, a lot of people were made more literate, and bought the Encyclopedists' anti-Christian agenda wholesale, tried to replicate their views, and it led to the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. They failed to practice discernment of literature, in other words, and I fear Belle would make the exact same mistake the Jacobins did in trusting literature. Just read up on this for a good idea of just WHAT precisely I fear Belle becoming: http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html

And also, the film tried to cram in a frankly needless feminist agenda and Belle in some ways came off looking far worse by comparison in terms of her placement in the role of the tale. It even tried to push the idea that women weren't even allowed to read at all until much later (not said in the film, but it's implied they weren't allowed to read until the 1960s). I also have more personal experience regarding the kind of message Linda Woolverton via Belle and Gaston tried to cram down our throats. I'll link you to some lectures of my professor who voiced similar sentiments to Woolverton and possibly to Belle: https://www.mediafire.com/#e02pmeur6q4yb If you still disagree, fine, but please, at least understand my reasoning for being distrustful of Belle now (and I don't even WANT to distrust Belle now).

reply

(not said in the film, but it's implied they weren't allowed to read until the 1960s).


Where in the movie is it implied that women weren't allowed to read until the 1960s?

The movie never implies women didn't read, it suggests that Belle reads and daydreams all the time (she even reads while walking through town!) and the villagers find that odd.

Don't go crying about me responding to a post not directed at me. You should simply account for the claims you make.

reply

Where in the movie is it implied that women weren't allowed to read until the 1960s?

The movie never implies women didn't read, it suggests that Belle reads and daydreams all the time (she even reads while walking through town!) and the villagers find that odd.


It's the fact that the villagers found it odd that Belle was a bibliophile, and then there's how Gaston made clear that he didn't think Belle should be reading on account of her gender, due to thinking and getting ideas (and he also said the villagers also thought likewise that was a problem). And certainly, Gaston said he didn't approve of that. THAT'S where it was implied.

reply

The villagers found it odd that Belle kept reading and daydreaming all the time. They never said it was odd for a woman to read at all.

Yes, Gaston was a sexist who didn't think women should read. He doesn't speak for the other villagers, however. He simply says the town talks about her constantly reading books, not that it's not right for a woman to read. Just listen to the song, none of the villagers mentions that.

So no, it's not implied that women weren't allowed to read (otherwise people would've come up to her and grabbed the book from her hands, maybe even thrown her in jail) and it certainly doesn't mention the 60s.

reply

Of course it doesn't mention the 1960s, the film's setting took place before that time. That DOESN'T mean, however, that wasn't what Linda Woolverton had in mind when she wrote it, and she made VERY clear that was what she had in mind when she said she used the Women's Movement for inspiration for the film.

And as far as Gaston, actually, he made CLEAR he was speaking for the villagers when he said that.

reply

Linda Woolverton may also think Brussels sprouts are the most delicious vegetables in the world, that doesn't mean this movie implies it in any way.

But where's your quote that Linda Woolverton believes women weren't allowed to read until the 60s? Don't claim it when you've got no quote.

And as far as Gaston, actually, he made CLEAR he was speaking for the villagers when he said that.


No, he did not. Don't put words in his or the villagers mouths. He simply refers to all the talk in town about her reading so much.

All the movie suggests is that that particular town is shallow for thinking it's odd that Belle reads and daydreams so much. It doesn't even say anything about French society at that time in general.

reply

Linda Woolverton may also think Brussels sprouts are the most delicious vegetables in the world, that doesn't mean this movie implies it in any way.


Unlike the Brussel sprouts bit, Woolverton made clear in various interviews that she DID intend for Beauty and the Beast and, heck, pretty much most of her films as of late, to push Women's Liberation due to being influenced by it.

As far as Woolverton, she made clear that "By the time I rolled around, I’d been through the women’s movement in the ‘60s and ‘70s and I definitely couldn’t buy that this smart, attractive young girl, Belle, would be sitting around and waiting for her prince to come." http://time.com/2798136/maleficent-beauty-beast-writer/ Linda Woolverton herself didn't explicitly mention the reading part, but what she said was VERY similar to what one of my professors said back in College, and in that professor's case, she did in fact say exactly that. I think you'd know, since I gave you the recordings of her beforehand (in fact, the link was even in my recent response for Furianna), so I know that what Woolverton is pushing is definitely the same as what Heather Lucas claimed, because I've experienced it.

No, he did not. Don't put words in his or the villagers mouths. He simply refers to all the talk in town about her reading so much.


Yeah, and then immediately after that he then harps on her on how women shouldn't read because they'd get ideas and thinking. It's pretty clear what they were trying to push there.

All the movie suggests is that that particular town is shallow for thinking it's odd that Belle reads and daydreams so much. It doesn't even say anything about French society at that time in general.


Of course it doesn't, especially when if it were anything like French society at that time, they'd practically be worshipping Belle's literacy if anything (thanks to how the Encyclopedists basically jammed the gears at the French Academie going by what Timothy Dwight said, which as you pointed out in another thread is also what led to the French Revolution). And for the record, being a bibliophile doesn't make you immune to being shallow any more than thinking someone reading and daydreaming would make you shallow. Don't forget, Sartre was a bibliophile, a philosopher even, yet he was actually pretty shallow, as were his female students whom he slept with.

reply

Linda Woolverton is NOT your college professor, she may have entirely different opinions. Not once did she say women weren't allowed to read, so don't put words in her mouth.

Gaston mentions Belle's excessive reading and then gives his own opinion on that. It's implied that HE thinks women shouldn't read, not the villagers.

So all we can conclude from the movie is that the inhabitants of this particular village think it's odd that Belle reads and daydreams so much and that Gaston is a sexist who thinks women shouldn't read. That's it!

reply

Do you even know about "reading between the lines"? It's pretty clear when you read between the lines of what Linda Woolverton said that it is in fact the same thing as what Heather Lucas said.

If the villagers didn't think that, why didn't they tell him off right then and there? Doesn't matter if they loved him or not, they still had the right to stop him. If they didn't tell him off regarding that, it means they agreed with him. Otherwise, they would have made explicit that they didn't.

reply

Give me a quote that shows that Linda Woolverton says women weren't allowed to read until the 60s.

The villagers didn't even hear what Gaston was saying to Belle, they were too far away. And they idolized Gaston, going against him would upset him.

reply

Whoo... Well, here comes my reply.

To some extent, she still does. After all, she seemed to be able to afford the luxury of having free time to read, which is something the villagers could only hope for. Compare that to, say, the triplets, who are working as waitresses just to make ends meet.

It didn't seem like Belle and Maurice had any servant though, so I have to assume that Belle did a lot of housework.

They never called her a lunatic until the ending (and even then, only Gaston said she was crazy, not the other villagers). Before then, they at best considered her slightly odd (which really isn't all that insulting).

Oh? One of the lines in the song "Belle" is "I wonder if she's feeling well". And we could see two guys doing the "spinning a finger around in a circle next to your head" gesture, heavily implying that she was considered insane.

Heck, if people thought I was somewhat odd, I'd take it with stride since let's face it, being diagnosed with Aspergers does make me odd, even though I do try not to let it control my life).

Well, well... I found a fellow aspie! Interesting...

As for the rest... Well, I have to side with Stratego on that one.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

It didn't seem like Belle and Maurice had any servant though, so I have to assume that Belle did a lot of housework.


Unfortunately, Belle basically decrying Gaston's intended role for her as his "little wife", which naturally would have included housework, would make me think she DOESN'T do housework. Why be upset about having to undergo the role of housewife if she's already doing housework anyways? Now, if they kept that scene with Belle actually baking a cake for her dad's return instead of cutting it because Woolverton had problems viewing Belle as being a liberated woman from that action, or even show her aerating the laundry like in the musical, that actually could work.

Oh? One of the lines in the song "Belle" is "I wonder if she's feeling well". And we could see two guys doing the "spinning a finger around in a circle next to your head" gesture, heavily implying that she was considered insane.


Hmm, I'll look into the latter bit, because mom mentioned something similar, although she mentioned old women instead of men. I do know that not all of the villagers thought Belle was crazy (heck, right before it cut towards the introduction of Gaston, some men who were helping load up some sort of see-saw wagon stopped what they were doing to give Belle a hat tip as she passed by, which led to one of the guys humorously getting hit by the other end of the wagon upside the head while loading it up and being knocked out, and I do know that guy moving the pumpkins definitely gave her a hat tip right at the beginning of the song. Even the Baker, the first person Belle interacted with, did at least have the courtesy to even ask what she was up to, which she explained, and in all fairness, he was busy trying to get bread prepared for customers to buy so he could feed his family.).
...
Okay, looking through DisneyScreencaps, I did find ONE person who may have considered her insane: A housewife nearing the beginning of the song when Belle proceeded to hitch a ride on that wagon. She did the whole spin finger around temple thing you alluded to earlier.

Well, well... I found a fellow aspie! Interesting...


Yeah. I wasn't initially considered autistic back when they did the CARS test when I was younger (I was very close to the spectrum, but I was off by a single point or two), but when they made it a spectrum, I was classified as such.

As for the rest... Well, I have to side with Stratego on that one.


Okay, but what do you think of those lectures I posted at least?

All I ask is, if she absolutely MUST complain about the village, can she at least do it in a way that actually WOULD make us sympathize with her, like, I don't know, it being a cesspool akin to Gotham, or actually highlighting that her time in the village was pretty much hell like Meg in Quahog Town? The prior DPs (barring Aurora since she didn't even dream of going away) at least had valid reasons for wanting to get away, like the fact that with Snow White and Cinderella, they were essentially under a very abusive household and treated little better than a slave, not to mention realistically could not even hope to just run away from home (even with Snow White, it literally took her stepmom trying to murder her to act on running away), and Ariel at least had a dad who, while well-meaning, did not handle situations well at all, more likely to shut out Ariel even when she does try to explain her side of things especially when he's got a xenophobic view of humans (with one comment even implying the possibility that he would deeply consider committing genocide against humans). Belle really didn't have that with her opening song.

Plus, another thing I ask is, if they want to make sure she is depicted as pure of heart, a true beauty inside and out, in other words, couldn't they at least depict her more like Honoka from Dead or Alive 5 Last Round, specifically one of the times she wins against someone (like here for example: https://youtu.be/bY2RvvuXabE?t=22 or here, if you will: http://honoka-fc.deviantart.com/art/Honoka-Power-Blow-Gif-525407293) instead of mockingly waving goodbye with a smirk after throwing Gaston out (as demonstrated here: http://67.media.tumblr.com/9e93cbbfb4514c6059c44d66d371c783/tumblr_ne4uw4c23E1tt2x1bo6_500.gif)? If they want to have Belle acting in self defense against Gaston, first rule of thumb, never, ever smirk and wave goodbye in a mocking manner, as that just makes her look bad and seem like she wanted to do that anyway.

reply

Unfortunately, Belle basically decrying Gaston's intended role for her as his "little wife", which naturally would have included housework, would make me think she DOESN'T do housework. Why be upset about having to undergo the role of housewife if she's already doing housework anyways? Now, if they kept that scene with Belle actually baking a cake for her dad's return instead of cutting it because Woolverton had problems viewing Belle as being a liberated woman from that action, or even show her aerating the laundry like in the musical, that actually could work.

Well, I see it more like that Belle didn't want to marry Gaston (who had just insulted her love for books, laughed at her dad's misfortune, just turned up at her house and expected her to be his bride, and who became the movie's "big bad") in particular. But that doesn't mean that that she would simply refuse to become a housewife in general, if a better man had courted her and proposed to her in a proper manner. Then again, Ms Woolvertoon did not seem to want to portray Belle as a future housewife at all. So I guess that you have a point there.

Hmm, I'll look into the latter bit, because mom mentioned something similar, although she mentioned old women instead of men.
[...]
Okay, looking through DisneyScreencaps, I did find ONE person who may have considered her insane: A housewife nearing the beginning of the song when Belle proceeded to hitch a ride on that wagon. She did the whole spin finger around temple thing you alluded to earlier.

My bad, you're right. It was a lady, who made the gesture.

All I ask is, if she absolutely MUST complain about the village, can she at least do it in a way that actually WOULD make us sympathize with her, like, I don't know, it being a cesspool akin to Gotham, or actually highlighting that her time in the village was pretty much hell like Meg in Quahog Town? The prior DPs (barring Aurora since she didn't even dream of going away) at least had valid reasons for wanting to get away, like the fact that with Snow White and Cinderella, they were essentially under a very abusive household and treated little better than a slave, not to mention realistically could not even hope to just run away from home (even with Snow White, it literally took her stepmom trying to murder her to act on running away), and Ariel at least had a dad who, while well-meaning, did not handle situations well at all, more likely to shut out Ariel even when she does try to explain her side of things especially when he's got a xenophobic view of humans (with one comment even implying the possibility that he would deeply consider committing genocide against humans). Belle really didn't have that with her opening song.

It is clear though that Belle was seen as the weird new-comer in the village, who had never managed to fit in with the others. That would be enough for most people to want to move on to something else.

Plus, another thing I ask is, if they want to make sure she is depicted as pure of heart, a true beauty inside and out, in other words, couldn't they at least depict her more like Honoka from Dead or Alive 5 Last Round, specifically one of the times she wins against someone (like here for example: https://youtu.be/bY2RvvuXabE?t=22 or here, if you will: http://honoka-fc.deviantart.com/art/Honoka-Power-Blow-Gif-525407293) instead of mockingly waving goodbye with a smirk after throwing Gaston out (as demonstrated here: http://67.media.tumblr.com/9e93cbbfb4514c6059c44d66d371c783/tumblr_ne4uw4c23E1tt2x1bo6_500.gif)? If they want to have Belle acting in self defense against Gaston, first rule of thumb, never, ever smirk and wave goodbye in a mocking manner, as that just makes her look bad and seem like she wanted to do that anyway.

What you seem to miss is that Gaston had acted like a creepy stalker earlier in that scene. So it served him right to end up in the mud.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

Well, I see it more like that Belle didn't want to marry Gaston (who had just insulted her love for books, laughed at her father's misfortune, just turned up in her house and expected her to be his bride, and who became the movie's "big bad") in particular. But that doesn't mean that that she would simply refuse to become a housewife in general, if a better man had courted her and proposed to her in a proper manner. Then again, Ms Woolvertoon did not seem to want to portray Belle as a future housewife at all. So I guess that you have a point there.


Yeah, I probably would have bought that she just didn't want to be Gaston's wife and may not have particularly minded housework if it weren't for the fact that Gaston wasn't the sole male of the village. There were plenty of other males in the village who could propose to her, some of whom would definitely have been far kinder to her than Gaston ever was. And besides, considering that Woolverton's culmination of what she tried to push since that movie, Maleficent, was the same movie that pretty much demonized all male characters and tried to make someone who in the original Disney film was explicitly considered pure unadorned evil personified (Mistress of All Evil) seem sympathetic, I'm still pretty sure Woolverton was having it against males themselves, not JUST Gaston, and had Belle showcase that. It doesn't help either that Belle seemed to indicate disgust towards housework itself, not simply doing housework for Gaston.

My bad, you're right. It was a lady, who made the gesture.


Yeah, that woman I can definitely say viewed Belle as being genuinely crazy, though that doesn't necessarily mean the entire village viewed her as crazy. The bookseller certainly didn't. Not sure about the triplets, though, since their presence at the wedding set-up suggests they did seem to view Belle as being enough of a friend to help set it up (and the fact that they were shocked about Gaston being the groom suggests they didn't even know he was the groom at all).

It is clear though that Belle was seen as the weird new-comer in the town, who had never managed to fit in with the others. That would be enough for most people to want to move on to something else.


Was it particularly clear, though? They don't even indicate WHEN she moved to the village (Belle in particular indicated that she's at the very least been at the village long enough to get a pretty good idea of the village's schedule and even be pretty much bored with the schedule, not to mention, even among the others, it was long enough for the villagers to be aware enough of what Belle's like), just that she wasn't born there. And various supplemental materials such as Marvel Comics, Disney Comics, heck, one of the rides at Disney even, indicated she had probably moved to the village when she was still a little girl. Now, maybe if they gave a specific time frame (a day, a week, a month, heck, even a year) of when they had moved to the village in the film I'd probably be more understanding. Problem is, they don't even indicate how long she's even been there. For all we know, she could be like Anakin Skywalker in The Phantom Menace and just moved to the village when she was, say, three years old.

What you seem to miss is that Gaston had acted like a creepy stalker earlier in that scene. So it served him right to end up in the mud.


I didn't miss that, and quite frankly, I don't disagree that Gaston deserved being thrown in the mud. He brought it upon himself for his arrogance and has no one to blame for himself for that, not to mention his overall creep behavior. I have little problem with the scene itself, but rather HOW it was presented. My main problem is Belle smirking and waving goodbye as if she just played a cruel joke on him. One of the original drafts had Belle actually lock Gaston in a closet for something similar, and they cut that out because, quite understandably, the other writers thought that just made Belle seem like a jerk. Last I checked, smirking and waving goodbye after sending him into a mudbath, even if he DID deserve it, is just as much jerk behavior as that scene they cut out. Me personally, I liked the musical version a lot better, where Belle at least made sure to politely yet sternly refuse Gaston without doing something like that. It also doesn't help that the way the scene was framed seemed less like Belle being desperate to get rid of Gaston and more like she's deliberately manipulating Gaston into being thrown into mud (such as her rather exaggerated movements to the door and her slightly sarcastic "Oh, Gaston! I'm... speechless. I really don't know what to say!"). In other words, it basically made her seem like the type to sweet talk men into getting their butts kicked for no real reason rather than someone actually trying to defend themselves.

To put it another way: In the Enchanted Christmas, Forte fully deserved having his keyboard smashed by Beast after all the crap he pulled trying to ruin Christmas and ruin any chance to end the curse out of sheer selfishness about wanting to remain useful to Beast instead of forgotten, yet Beast nonetheless held remorse for having to do so, even if it was to save the castle and out of self defense. Belle could have at least expressed shock to show that while she DID want Gaston to leave, she didn't necessarily intend for him to fall into mud, instead of that smirk and mock-wave that she did in that .GIF.

reply

Well, I do have to agree with you on one thing: The opening song at least WAS pretty badly handled. They could have used that time making the village to actually EXPLAIN why Belle moved to the village, and not just mention off-handedly that she moved the village some time prior (and it's not even clear exactly when she moved to the village). Not to mention, Belle's complaints about the village were pretty poor, and if anything made her look more like an arrogant snob, since the things she was complaining about were it being provincial and full of "little people." And they should have given Gaston more of a motivation than simply because she's the "most beautiful woman in the village" when the mere existence of those triplets flat out conflicted with that view. Oh, and actually elaborate more on WHY Belle hated being at the village, since there's almost nothing in there worth complaining about (and even the villagers' lyrics didn't exactly indicate they held Belle with any ill will, and other than acknowledging she's somewhat odd, they really don't do anything bad to her, Gaston aside). We can't even say she was financially poor or that that was the reason why she moved to the village, considering she was able to afford the time to read books, which even back in pre-Revolution France, middle class people, while undeniably literate for the most part thanks to the printing press a couple of centuries back, would not have been able to afford the time to read since they are in many instances trying to work their backs off on various jobs trying to eat, and the only time they might afford reading anything, it's spent on the Bible or the Catechism.


I was watching the film tonight for the first time since 2003, and noticed her complaints too. It seemed a little a-typical for a Disney-princess in waiting. Some background story would have been helpful.

The Dutch translation is a little different from the original song text:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfnUfDsyqDE

It roughly translates to this:

"It's always quiet in our village, nothing new happens. In our village the locals constantly sing the same tune/ every single day is the same."

"This sometimes gets to me." (The village's inner workings and social interaction being repetitive.)

"Should I spend the rest of my life like this?"

It's clearly softened up. The villagers now come across as much ruder than Belle.

Unfortunately, Belle basically decrying Gaston's intended role for her as his "little wife", which naturally would have included housework, would make me think she DOESN'T do housework. Why be upset about having to undergo the role of housewife if she's already doing housework anyways? Now, if they kept that scene with Belle actually baking a cake for her dad's return instead of cutting it because Woolverton had problems viewing Belle as being a liberated woman from that action, or even show her aerating the laundry like in the musical, that actually could work.


I don't believe Belle did not perform any housework. She is shown mostly reading, but she might have done her chores before that. After all, quite a bit of the day must have passed as Belle went to the village in the morning and then waved off her father (supposedly end of the morning, early afternoon). We then see Gaston appear, having organized an entire wedding - this must have taken sometime. Furthermore, we do see Belle go out to feed and tend the animals.

Belle might have spend her free time on reading while other villagers could have preferred to hang out at the local pub for a drink.

reply

I was watching the film tonight for the first time since 2003, and noticed her complaints too. It seemed a little a-typical for a Disney-princess in waiting. Some background story would have been helpful.


Yeah, agreed. Fortunately, we're definitely going to get background for Belle in the remake, including an actual reason why she doesn't just leave the village (especially seeing how, unlike her predecessors or even to some extent her successors, there wasn't anything holding her back from pursuing her dreams in the first place), so it's all good.

The Dutch translation is a little different from the original song text:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfnUfDsyqDE

It roughly translates to this:

"It's always quiet in our village, nothing new happens. In our village the locals constantly sing the same tune/ every single day is the same."

"This sometimes gets to me." (The village's inner workings and social interaction being repetitive.)

"Should I spend the rest of my life like this?"

It's clearly softened up. The villagers now come across as much ruder than Belle.


Yeah, that's definitely an improvement. Guess whoever did the translation has the same sense as Ted Woolsey (which is meant as a compliment, since his translation magic for Final Fantasy VI is what made Kefka popular outside Japan). Would be a bit better if the villagers treated Belle like Quahog frequently treated Meg from Family Guy, but translations have their limits, and they can't actually alter the animation or add scenes in (Pokémon 4Ever nonwithstanding).

I don't believe Belle did not perform any housework. She is shown mostly reading, but she might have done her chores before that. After all, quite a bit of the day must have passed as Belle went to the village in the morning and then waved off her father (supposedly end of the morning, early afternoon). We then see Gaston appear, having organized an entire wedding - this must have taken sometime. Furthermore, we do see Belle go out to feed and tend the animals.


I want to agree with you there, but Belle's disgust towards Gaston's plans to have her be a housewife that would do housework would lead me to suspect she probably never DID do housework (not much point in her disgust with Gaston's desire for her to be a housewife if she already was doing housework anyways). And I'm not entirely sure if she actually went out to feed the animals, she just ran around in a huff). She did feed birds when at Beast's castle, though, but that seemed more like a hobby. Though at least the remake gives a valid excuse for why she barely seems to do housework (namely, like her dad, she's an inventor, and quite frankly, that made more sense than in the original film since why on earth would she NOT have any apparent interest in inventing stuff when her dad was skilled at that, let alone actually do any inventing).

Belle might have spend her free time on reading while other villagers could have preferred to hang out at the local pub for a drink.


Well, most other villagers. I'm pretty sure that the triplets "hanging out" at the local pub was more their job than their actual free time.

reply

The original was the best I think..when I saw this as a kid it was really trippy for a 6 year old when animated movies were still relatively new. The movie sucked me right in.. it was really mysterious and awe inspiring. Really great Disney film

reply