MovieChat Forums > L'amant (1992) Discussion > Age limit 12 in Germany !!

Age limit 12 in Germany !!


Hi, I'm from Germany. I've seen this movie and I was surprised: The age limit in Germany is 12 ! What do you think about it ?

Wormatia 4-Ever

reply

Wow, I am shocked! Is the German version edited? Because the movie is very explicit, and it was originally NC-17( which means you have to be 18 or older to see it) here. But, It is still a great film!

reply

Nope, non-edited and uncut that movie. Normally the age limit is 16 when it's an erotic-movie ( 18 for hard erotic-movies and Pornos). But if it's a documentation about sexuality the age limit is sometimes 12, sometimes 16. Depending on sexual explicitness, brutality, rape scenes, and so on.
But NC-17 is not really often used, is it ? The most movies including sex scenes are rated R, aren't they ?


Wormatia 4-Ever

reply

Yeah, NC-17 is a rating that a few movies get, generally if the sex is really explicit, but usually, they make an editied R-version, and an unrated uncut version which This film "L'amant" is now here! Typically, Movies that are rated NC-17 have a highly disturbing depiction of sex and/or violence, cruelty etc. all taken to an extreme hardcore effect, and can be very hard to watch! This was probably changed because it is a highly emotional documentation of sexuality, not gutwrenching offense! But, some NC-17 FILMS ARE VERY GOOD EX. "Last Tango In Paris"- and others are highly shocking Ex."The Cook, The Thief, His Wife, & Her Lover"! Is this film popular German? And what other films are rated 16 that would be considered adult here?

reply

"The Cook, the Thief, His Wife + Her Lover" is popular, yeah. But it's rated 18.
"Last Tango in Paris", "Dreamers", "Henry and June": all rated 16 in Germany, in the USA NC-17 because of sexuality. X-rated movies are all rated 18.

Wormatia 4-Ever

reply

Thanx, Henry and June is a film i've always wondered about! Movies are no longer rated X because it was officially changed to NC-17, and alot of the old X films are now R and unrated just because they were very shocking for their
times, but not today EX. The 1962 version of Lolita was once rated X but now it is something alot of the world can see if they can look past the stigma!

reply

Are you sure the age limit 12 version is non-edited? Because it has only 110 minutes runtime...I tried to get an uncut version of the movie, but there's only the 110 minutes version available. Since the original movie has 115 minutes runtime, there must be 5 minutes missing.

reply

It's in PAL therefore 110 min = 115 min.

reply

How does PAL affect the total length of the film?!?! PAL is 50 fps non-interlaced, and NTSC is 60 fps interlaced. Film is [usually] 24 fps non-interlaced. But a second is a second, and 60 of them makes a minute, and 115 of them makes 115 minutes.

If you played a 115 minute movie in 110 minutes, regardless of the frame rate, it would look like people were walking somehow weirdly fast, and talking in high pitched voices along the lines of the chipmunks---granted, not to an extreme degree, but it would be noticable.

reply

No, it doesn't affect voices and music that way; the distortion is far to be enough to be noticed by a human hear.
I live in Italy I grant you this difference in length is absolutely; we can actually also see the picture lower quality when the camera move laterally, because of different technology.

But all of that apply to video releases: PAL and NTSC are video standards...

reply

[deleted]

How does PAL affect the total length of the film?!?! PAL is 50 fps non-interlaced, and NTSC is 60 fps interlaced. Film is [usually] 24 fps non-interlaced. But a second is a second, and 60 of them makes a minute, and 115 of them makes 115 minutes.

If you played a 115 minute movie in 110 minutes, regardless of the frame rate, it would look like people were walking somehow weirdly fast, and talking in high pitched voices along the lines of the chipmunks---granted, not to an extreme degree, but it would be noticable.
It is because when film is transferred to NTSC it is projected at 24 frames per second with a special pulldown and shutter set-up to match to the 60 frame rate. But with PAL the telecine projects at 25 frames per second which matches well with the 50 field rate of PAL all on its own. But it means that it is sped up. The sound is affected the most in terms of pereception since the pitch is changed. This can be adjusted back electronically but the run time is still sped up.

Oh Lord, you gave them eyes but they cannot see...

reply


by jiffypack
» Thu Nov 16 2006 03:49:30
IMDb member since October 2006
It's in PAL therefore 110 min = 115 min.


Blu-Ray is 23.976fps or 24.000fps, there is no PAL or NTSC. Also nowadays rarely movies get speed up to PAL or NTSC format, the runtime doesn't change.

Anyway the Blu-Ray German release is 110minutes. So 5minutes are missing. So it's not the full unrated cut.

This german site says it's 115minutes instead, so it would be the full unrated uncut version:

http://www.bluray-disc.de/blu-ray-filme/der-liebhaber-1992-blu-ray-dis c


Verpackung:
HD Keep Case
Altersfreigabe:
FSK: Freigegeben ab 12 Jahren

Sprachen:
Deutsch DTS-HD MA 2.0
Englisch DTS-HD MA 2.0

Untertitel:
Deutsch für Hörgeschädigte, Englisch

Region:
B
Disc Kapazität:
BD-50 GB
Bildformat(e):
1920x1080p (1.85:1)
Video-Codec:
MPEG-4/AVC
Spieldauer:
115 Minuten
Veröffentlichung:
28.10.2011 (Release)



Oh, well, just to be sure I ordered it...

reply

well, since ur in germany, and the age limit is 12, r there more movies like this.
i really would like to know. pls do write.

reply

Yeah, well...there are more rated 12: Lolita (62), Better than Sex (00), all teen-erotic comedys like American Pie.
But I can't tell you now all titels, there are so many. Look by yourselves, if ya want to know, mates !

Wormatia 4-Ever

reply

Maybe Germans are more open-minded than other nations,but I still think this movie should have another limit.At least 16.One-because it has very explicit images and Two-because these images won't keep children of that age focusing on the story and see everything that this great film has to offer.i personally doubt they will remember anything else from this movie.

reply

Well, might be. But that does not apply to me. :D I was 13 when I saw this film for the first time and I discerned it as a great lovestory. Although there are sex scenes, it did not matter to me. If they go with the story it's alright I think. You understand it, even if you are in puberty or sth, which makes your life confusing.

reply

I DEFINITELY don't think sexual movies deserve the stigma they get. I think it's horrible that violence, which is against the law in so many countries, is not given as high a rating as sexual movies. I'm not talking about pornos, they're a "special kind" of sexual movie. I haven't actually seen this movie yet but I'm highly interested in watching it.

reply

I saw this for the first time when I was 11 many years ago and I barely even noticed the sex. Infact the movie made me cry. To this day, I consider this to be the most moving and beautiful lovestory that I've ever seen.

reply

Will someone PLEASE explain to me how seeing THIS film could ever harm the mind of a child?? How can the sight of a naked breast, or exposed ass, or two people engaged in normal, non-violent softcore sex possibly harm a child? I think this way of thinking of the human body as being dirty, or sex being sinful and wrong, is the absolute worst thing you could teach a young person. Like I stated in another post, I would rate this one for all ages, while putting heavy restrictions on truly sick, and degenerating films like Hostel. Sex is natural, violence is not. Good lesson for kids, IMO.

reply

I agree. To me the German way of rating makes a little more sense than the American ratings. Sex in films is not a bad thing, as long as it is presented in a natural way and not exploited. A naked breast is no reason for a higher rating. There are films in Germany that show naked breasts and are rated 6 years and over (Sonnenallee), L'amant got a 12-rating (it is not that explicit) and even 9 Songs, which includes very explicit scenes of real sex, got a 16-rating. Most of the more explicit arthouse erotic films are rated 16.

On the other hand German ratings are extremely harsh on violence. For example Hostel 2 is not available uncut in Germany. That is a bit over the edge for me. Every film should at least be available for adults, but it's still more understandable than with depictions of people making love which is a completely natural thing for everybody, even young persons.

reply

i totally agree.

reply

[deleted]

In Italy is rated T (no limit of age), like in France; full length version, if you wonder.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I remember seeing "Perfume" and it had age limit 12 in Germany, 18 in UK and 15 here in my country (Norway). I was shocked about that. I was 14 when i saw it. Had lots of nudity and disturbing themes. Not really appropriate for 12 year olds, I think. It was rated R(17) in US. I have yet to see this, but it has a very mature theme, that's for sure. As far as I know, I think they are less strict about ratings in Germany, and Finland actually. In Norway they tend to be very strict sometimes, but sometimes they are not really strict at all. The Lord of the Rings are 11, while The Batman films are all 15. So strange to me.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

A true Malcoholic.
Harry Potter and Disney are my life.

"There is always a way!"

reply

Most women I have known and spoke to regarding intimate subjects have discovered their own sexuality prior to age 12. I find the legal limit in Germany as following mother nature's course. Sex is the greatest pleasure us mortals are allowed during our short lives. The sooner one starts enjoying the better.

Just curious, was this law made under Hitler's control of the country in order to provide more soldiers to the Wehrmacht?

reply

..at least sex is legal from 14+
Sry' an older woman did me - at the tender age of 15..then again I'm from Danmark..and it was in 1995:-) NOW we have higher values...

reply