The Tunnel


What does the dog symbalize in the episode "The Tunnel"?

reply

I am not exactly sure, and I think it may very well be a matter of interpretation, but I think that the dog represents what the character cannot let go. Like, the rest of his men march away in the end, but the sentry is still there, nagging at him. At least, thats how it makes sense to me ^_^. I loved this film as a whole, so glad I bought the dvd.

reply



people often assume there is symbolism in films when sometimes there isn't any.

dreams are not just symbolic content.

it could be a reference to the western notion of the 'dogs of war', which is a reference to
a line of shakespeare that is about the brutal and savage, unfettered destructiveness of war.

however, you have to put the dog in context.....the dog appears in front of the tunnel, barking and baring teeth, and growling. It seems like it is associated with the tunnel, and that it might attack.
It also comes out of the tunnel.

So I think it is like Cerebrus, the Greek gatekeeper of the Underworld...the tunnel is the underworld where the dead exist.

And in psychological terms would be the unconscious. The captain, or sargeant is overcoming
his being haunted by the ghosts of the men who died under his command.

the dog appears on the other end of the tunnel, again as the gatekeeper, i believe.

reply

It helps to watch Black Orpheus (1959), which has a similar-looking dog called Cerbero performing a similar function.

reply

That's not "Black Orpheus". That's just Orpheus. The film "Black Orpheus" is a modern retelling of the Greek myth of Orpheus. In the Orpheus legend, in which Orpheus descends to the underworld to rescue his lover from death, the underworld is guarded by the dog Cerberus. "Black Orpheus" tries to present, with mixed results, a realistic depiction of the Orpheus myth in which the underworld takes the form of the Carnival in Rio. So it would make much more sense to mention Cocteau's "Orpheus", the original cinematic adaptation of the myth, as a reference, rather than "Black Orpheus" (unless Cocteau's adaptation omitted the dog -- did it? I don't remember.)

reply

I think there's a few possiblities the dog could represent a Cerberus type guardian to the gates of the underworld/land of the dead. The Commander is not dead therefore cannot enter and only when the guardian is gone cna the dead come to the commander. The other possibilities probably fall into the realm of psychology which is not my strength but the dog could represent the guilt the commander feels over the loss of his men and the shame he has for not having died with them.

reply

I think that the dog is a symbol of war. The dog is guarding the tunnel where the men emerge from and eventually go back to, suggesting how war took these men away. Also I know that Kurosawa was a big fan of Shakespear (Throne of Blood, Ran) and I think it was Shakespear that compared war to a hound "Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war".

reply

First Chapter Name:
The snarling sentinal

Last Chaptr NAme:
The sentinal returns

I believe that the dog is a guardian of the tunnel which is a zone in which the dead wander. By misguarding the dog and passing through the tunnel, the commander awakens his fallen comrades. At the end, the dog seems more angry and aggressive and "tells" the commander to move away, to let the fallen rest in peace.

reply

I think, like others have said, that the dog represents Cerberus. And from Greek mythology I remeber that two characters had to walk through a crack in a mountain then walk a ways to the mouth of hell. And then there was a door with the Cerberus on the other side allowing whomever to enter, but put there to stop those who wish to leave.

My point is that even though it sounds cliche, maybe the commander has just returned from hell (the war) and now wants to leave ( back to civilan life). And since he was the commander, the soldiers once under him still blindly follow him.


And for the dog returning at the end, I think maybe its saying something along the lines that maybe the commander, who although didnt die in battle deserves to be in hell with the rest.

But who knows, right?

reply

[deleted]

The dog represents simply the western idea of the dog of war. The red light symbolizes simply blood or bloodshed.

Whoever it was that said it was Shakespeare... You are correct.

reply

It is also believed by some that animals can sense the dead. So perhaps this helps to explain the appearance of the dog a little more.

reply

Well... The main character here is still alive... But just notice what the dog is wearing... Frag Grenades I believe... Listen to its bark... Almost of another world... Like war can be...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

If it helps, the name of the chapters for 'The Tunnel' in the DVD refer to the dog as 'Sentinel'.

reply

That also confused me. It helped that a friend pointed out that the things the dog seemed to be carrying looked like gernades that the Japanese made during WWII. Possibly, it is simply a reminder of the pain that the commander has been through. First losing his battalion, then being locked up in a camp (with dogs guarding, I'm sure), and then the long battle with himself. If anything, the dog is a guard, much like the function would be in real life, and is simply a reminder to the commander what he's been through, and what he has done in the past. Much like an emotional scar for soldiers.

I also liked the film. I actually just got out of seeing it (we had to watch it for a school assingment and the teacher showed it to us in the auditorium movie-theatre style), and I was hoping to find more information to make some scenes make sense.

reply

Isn't it obvious what the dog sounds like? Kurosawa mixed the sound of the dogs barking with that of bullets and shells being fired... The dog is glowing red as if from hell, or the afterlife (as someone mentioned)... I don't believe that the Commander is alive, I believe that he is dead, as shown by his journey through the tunnel, in which everything becomes cold... and when he is speaking to the soldiers he says "I felt that dying was easier," he doesn't say that it would be easier, or that he thought it was easier, he says it like he has experienced both torture and death... and when the dog returns, it circles him around, so his back is to the tunnel...

reply

(Sory if my english is bad, my mother language is spanish..)

I agree with all your theories about the dog, but when I saw the movie I thought another thing...I thought that the dog was part of the batallion (and of course it died in battle) because it was carrying a bagpack with granades and it was bleeding. But why is the dog so angry at the commander? well that's because of the difference between men and dogs: those soldiers were aware that they were in a war, they fought, they died with honour for their country and so they could forgive their commander for leading them to death. But dogs are free and this one was captured by "evil" men that do not matter if it died because for them it is another military instrument...so that is why the dog cannot forgive the commander (or any men), because it is so furious with mankind. And that is the point I think Kurosawa is trying to make in this dream: the human tendency to destroy not only themselves but the animals, the whole world, etc.

Please someone tell me what do you think about my theory.

reply

I buy your interpretation, Vikingou, but I'm not sure it matters. There CAN be more than one way to understand this movie. The beauty about this movie is that you take from it what you will.
My interpretation - most of the sequences ended without the action being resolved. The man is being chased by a demon and the scene ends, the boy travels under the rainbow and the scene ends. With that in mind, I interpreted the dog as the personification of War, and, although small in size, he seemed more than a match for the commander. Either the commander escaped after the scene ended, or he was defeated by the dog.

reply

[deleted]