MovieChat Forums > Laser Mission Discussion > Over Exposure?

Over Exposure?

posted 17 years ago by ryanatgeekside
6 replies | jump to latest

Was it just my edition of the DVD or was this movie nearly unbearable to watch because of the it was over exposed?

ry

[–] YourUltraViolentNarrator 17 years ago

All copies are like that, see what it was , was the lighting and use of video instead of film.

[–] ryanatgeekside 17 years ago

It really was intolerable, but I had to watch it to add another notch under my belt. ;) No repeat viewings happening for me anytime soon.

ry

[–] carmer1986 15 years ago

"No repeat viewings happening for me anytime soon."

Am I the only one that liked this movie? Granted it's not as good as his other 3 main films but I liked it. The only thing I don't like is the video transfer.

[–] aloep 17 years ago

All copies are like that, see what it was , was the lighting and use of video instead of film.

Um, are you saying this movie was shot on video rather than film? It's a few years since I last saw it, but I'm 99.9% sure it was shot on film. I have an early 90's VHS copy and the quality of it is much like any other VHS copy of a movie of this age. I have read from various sources that the US budget DVD release is an obvious VHS transfer, but I'm pretty sure the original movie was shot on film.

[–] edpeace52 14 years ago

I just watched the movie. In the end credits it says: "Laser Mission was filmed on AGFA Gevaert XT125 & XT 320"

[–] Balibari 7 years ago

My copy isn't overexposed and it definitely isn't shot on video.