I didn't think SOAF was as bad of a movie as PG or C&PD were.
Considered as a stand-alone film.
NOT a Tom Clancy Film,
Not a Jack Ryan Story....
SOAF is a decent film.
But the Sum of all Fears IS A Jack Ryan story, and a Tom Clancy Movie and as such it is horrible. The worst adaptation of a Novel to film that exists. While you are entitled to your opinion, to even suggest that SOAF is better than PG and CAPD, shows a severe lack of ability to make such a judgment.
Anyone who thinks that SOAF is a good Tom Clancy film... NEVER read the novel.
Other than the title, the NAMES of a few characters, and the most bare bones of plot elements... And by bare bones I mean reducing the plot down to it's most basic elements, like Titanic= Boat strikes ice, sinks.
There is NOTHING in the film that resembles the novel.
Nothing.
Terrorists blow up a homemade nuke in the USA.
That's it... that is all the resemblance of the Clancy Novel that exists.
WHO those terrorists are is altered.
WHY they are doing so is altered.
Where they blow the bomb is altered.
How Ryan Figures it out is altered
What he does about it is altered
John Clark and Ding Chavez's role in capturing the terrorists is altered (with Ding being written completely out of it)
Who Jack Ryan is... is completely altered.
Who Cabot is... is completely altered.
If one were to change Jack Ryan's name to something else and change the title of the film, One would be hard pressed to recognize the Film as being based on a Clancy novel at all.
Because EVERYTHING was altered.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
reply
share