Adm. William F. Halsey


In one scene Jack says that he wrote a book about Admiral William F. Halsey. Who is he? What did Admiral Halsey wrong, according to Ramius?

reply

Admiral William F. Halsey. Who is he?


Great question. They JUST now invented this thing which can help you find out, it is called, "THE INTERNET."

You get on your computer, open something like Google, type in the guys name and hit "Enter." All sorts of results will pop up and you can read about him. 👍

reply

Would you like to do it for me and tell me what you can find out?

reply

[deleted]

1st... A little about you. What is your background coming into this question?

The reason I ask is because William F. "Bull" Halsey is a MAJOR HISTORICAL FIGURE in the Pacific theater of WW2.

If you are of High school age or above, and have lived in the USA, Britain, Japan, or any Major westernized modern society with a credible education system... there is absolutely NO EXCUSE in not knowing who he is other than pure stupidity.

Not that you need to know every aspect of his history, but to not even to have heard of him is inexcusable.

Now if you are from some 3rd world sh!thole... Or maybe you're just a very young kid in elementary school... perhaps.


I'll answer who he is. And Yes I am very aware of what the supposed mistake is that Ramius is referring to (actually there are two possibilities, but only one of the more commonly talked about)

But HOW I respond depends on the legitimacy or inexcusability of your not even knowing who he is.



I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Hi

I dont live in a *beep* country. I live in Vienna and I am proud to tell you, it is the most livible city in the world :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercer_Quality_of_Living_Survey

I dont think that I have to apologize for not knowing who William THE BULL Halsey is. I am austrian, I dont like to put the shrimp on the barbie. Christopher Waltz and Arnold Schwarzenegger are from Austria. Austria is in Europe.

I would say, more than 90% of the people here in Austria dont know who Admiral Halsey is. Hell, I am pretty sure no one ever mentioned him and I never had an discussion about him and what he did. I am not familiar with the naval history of the USA. The only admirals I know are Admiral Nelson and Admiral Ackbar.

So please tell me more about this guy

reply

[deleted]

Good, Austria is a country, we can agree on that.

But it is not a "sh!thole" country though.

Maybe you got confused over my message,

Anyway thank you.




reply

The only one confused was you. What part of "IF" did you not understand?

I said IF you come from some 3rd world sh!thole....
And that was after stating IF you came from some modern westernized country...

I was putting forth two possibilities... not making a claim.

YOU fraked up and failed to understand.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

But it is not a "sh!thole" country though.


I have to disagree. Apparently you can't even look up who Admiral Halsey was on the internet in your country. That makes it pretty sh!tty.

reply

It is a bit surprising that this question isn't in the FAQ for this movie, considering how many times it's come up on the board. Of course, most people who ask actually know WHO Halsey was.

reply

I was actually trying to find my sources I used during the last major discussion on this topic. Here I found the actual message to Halsey from Nimitz... easy enough. But on the previous thread, I had Halsey's message of intent regarding the formation of TF34, Kincaid's messages, Nimitz's orders to Halsey, all of it. Tried to find them last night and my google fu failed.

As for your last bit... yeah. Unless you just crawled out from under a rock, most educated people know of Admiral Halsey, even if all they know is that he was some bigshot US Admiral during WW2 and know nothing of the details of his career.
But to have never heard of him is inexcusable from any well developed and well educated nation.

If I, as an American, know who Admiral Lütjens is.... then he as an Austrian can know who Admiral Halsey is.



I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

But to have never heard of him is inexcusable from any well developed and well educated nation.


I agree, although in fairness to other Austrians who aren't the OP, he may not be a representative example. I've encountered more than a few of our own countrymen who seem quite ignorant, ill-informed, and unable to do a simple internet search. But I agree it's still inexcusable.

reply

I do not condemn a whole group based upon one idiot either.

Which is why I added the caveat "if true" to my statement earlier.

Based upon your comment, if true... You guys are so insular and egocentric you put the false claims of American egocentrism to shame.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

What an incredibly rude response to a simple question. You take arrogance to an impressive level and you really should consider medication. By the way, I am an educated man and I had never heard of Halsey. Maybe I did at some point in my life but I did not recognize the name.

reply

OK so between myself and one other person who called the OP all sorts of names and was far ruder than I and coincidentally never did answer the question...

And whereas I actually went to great lengths to answer the OP regardless....

You chose ME to act against in the same manner you accuse me of.
And said nothing to the person who was far more rude than I and did not answer the question at all.

Funny how you chose to be the *beep* against. doing the very thing you dislike about me.
You choose the lesser of the two who were rude, and the one who actually took he time to answer anyways.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Ok, usually I'm the guy who googles anything he comes across, but in this case, I have to sort of leap to the defense of a fellow Austrian.

Please bear in mind that not only our own naval history is pretty non-existent... well, we once had a navy, but that was almost 100 years ago when we were still under Habsburg rule, and even then, our navy always played second (or even third) fiddle to the army, but that the Pacific theatre of World War 2 also is regarded as a second-rate theatre around here. Not that it wasn't important (far from that), but there's virtually no connection whatsoever between Austria and, say, Leyte Gulf or Midway. Your argument on Raeder and Dönitz falls a bit flat there, since they both were directly involved in military actions against your navy in the Atlantic, but Halsey wasn't part of these engagements. Neither was Kurita (which, around here, most people would sum up with "Japanese Admiral, World War 2" around here as well, if they could actually say anything about him).

The Pacific theatre is also only mentioned briefly in history classes, it basically boils down to "Japanese spread across the Pacific, attack Pearl Harbor, got curb-stomped afterwards." with only brief mentions of key battles.

Hell, I only know one detail of the whole Taffy Three engagement: Captain Evans of the Johnston, badly burnt and virtually naked, screaming orders from a completely shot-up bridge. And I've only read of this guy because I was reading a series on military badasses and strange events in war.

I've never heard of Halsey myself before I saw "The Hunt for Red October" (and, to be fair, I was 13 when I first saw it and during puberty I had more interesting things to do than to look up US admirals), and from that little remark by Ramius I've only gleaned that he might have done something that worked despite being utterly wrong in the context of the situation (or the general perception of the moment), but he - basically - got lucky, the whole situation might have been a complete failure otherwise. Imagine Warren's blunder at the Spion Kop working out perfectly, or the Light Brigade managing to capture and hold the guns at the end of the valley. Or, the other way around, imagine Wittmann getting shot to pieces at Villers Bocage or Cain getting squished by the first tank he came across at Arnheim. How would we perceive these events today?

Sure, the OP might have done some research before. But he just asked a simple question regarding one tiny tidbit of a topic he wasn't familiar with just to get some info. I'm utterly baffled by the fact that, instead of just giving him a quick rundown on the action in question, namely Halsey falling for a decoy fleet during the Leyte gulf campaign instead of "staying at his post", so to speak, you immediately jumped to name-calling and belittling him for asking.

Sorry to break the news to you, CGSailor, but that's just plain asinine. I've seen quite a lot of your answers here on the boards, and especially in maritime matters I usually value your answers, but honestly, you're sometimes riding a pretty high horse.

Kung-Fu movies are like porn. 1-on-1 first, then 2-on-1, and then a group scene...

reply

Sure, the OP might have done some research before.


If he did some research before, he wouldn't have needed to ask the question. There are several entries on Google about the subject of Halsey "acting foolishly."

I jumped his sh!t too because I don't like lazy people. To ask for more clarification is one thing; to not bother to type a few words into Google to find out on your own is lazy and that shouldn't be rewarded.

reply

So you are another one of those people who had never heard of the thing called, "THE INTERNET" before you came to this board?

Wait....if that is so, how did you come to this internet board????


You should probably work on your reading comprehension if that remark was meant for me.

If he did some research before, he wouldn't have needed to ask the question. There are several entries on Google about the subject of Halsey "acting foolishly."

I jumped his sh!t too because I don't like lazy people. To ask for more clarification is one thing; to not bother to type a few words into Google to find out on your own is lazy and that shouldn't be rewarded.


Reading my post again, I now see that I've used "might" while I should've used "could". Sorry. English's not my first language, and though I may be able to claim a certain degree of proficiency in it, I mix up some words sometimes. It happens, even after speaking (more like: reading and writing in) the language for now almost 24 years.

Still, the question stands: In times of oh-so-all-knowing Google, should asking questions before googling be shunned?

Kung-Fu movies are like porn. 1-on-1 first, then 2-on-1, and then a group scene...

reply

You should probably work on your reading comprehension if that remark was meant for me.


I would say the same thing to you. Or, tell you to learn how read the message board to know who is replying to whom.

Still, the question stands: In times of oh-so-all-knowing Google, should asking questions before googling be shunned?


Yes.

reply

I should also mention that Googling, Binging, Yahooing or Asking will most likely garner you a less biased and less critical response than asking the question on Imdb.

I don't believe in the logic of 'there are no stupid questions'. I have always laid out a leveled ideal to my sailors. Do not be afraid to ask questions. But before you ask questions first you have to analyze whether or not you already know the answer to the question. Think first and then if you don't know the answer the next thing you do is try to figure it out yourself. Can I look in Pub, Tech or Rating Manual? Can I find the answer in the various portals online? Can I find the answer amongst my peers? If at that point you don't know than ask the question. Of course this would be dependent upon the nature of the situation, is it impending needing an answer immediately and so on.

Imdb is more in the spectrum of Editorials and Op-eds. There is a distinct base on Imdb that query who they consider to be SME's(Subject Matter Experts). That is a hit and miss game though. I don't feel the OP is doing that though, the OP is trolling.

You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?

reply

I'll add to that by saying the first time I come to a movie / show's board, I read all of the trivia, goofs and crazy credits before I go to the discussion board. That way I already have a lot of questions answered.

And then I'll scroll through the first page of threads to see if there is already a thread about my question/subject. If there are only a couple of pages, I'll scroll through them all.

Not everyone is a troll, but I can't tell you the number of times someone asks a question which had 2 or 3 other threads and is explained in one of the first entries in the trivia or goofs section.

reply

The extravagance with some trolls on IMDB is honestly an art form in their eyes. There is one guy that CGSailor and I are familiar with. The guy has at least a dozen active sock puppets. He spends a lot of time moving between accounts, talking to himself, piling in with all his socks and hijacking threads. He knows what he is doing and its fun for him. There are other trolls they don't even realize they are trolling, it just comes natural for them to troll for response.

I have an XO that labels all his Briefing Powerpoint "This is a GIYF Zone, Remember this before you ask any stupid questions". GIYF even transcends google now, it doesn't have to be google it can just be a general rule of thumb. Not being sexist in any way. The brief before the initial airstrike on ISIL for this particular CVW, a female F-18 pilot asks aloud "what does ISIL stand for, what is the difference between ISIL and ISIS, are they offshoots of one or the other?" GIYF.

You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?

reply

I digress.....

First, the OP isn't innocent. His subject is 'Adm. William F. Halsey'. The movie never mention Adm. William F. Halsey in full name. All that is mentioned in the movie about Halsey is this:
Ryan- "I wrote a biography on Admiral Halsey called The Fighting Sailor about naval combat tactics."
Ramius- "I know this book, your conclusions were all wrong Ryan, Halsey acted stupidly."

So the OP basically is trolling. He knows enough about Halsey to call him William F. Halsey. So why look him up than ask the question like that? Trolling for a response, and gauging his picking at the responses he fulfills another part of the troll profile.

On to the other thing. Ignorance is not bliss. It matters not that you or he are in Austria and that in Austria Halsey is not a common topic. It also doesn't matter that Naval Warfare having never been a 'thing' in Austria therefore its no surprise that most people don't know about it. No I am confident that the general public in Austria have little knowledge of the minutiae surrounding military history. The same as the US public for that matter. These topics are not grade school subjects included in history courses. There is little if any inclusion of the name Halsey in US grade school text books. I am looking at my nephews history text book as I write. There is mention of the US Pacific Island Hopping Campaign and Admiral Halsey but that is it. So how does any one learn about this stuff? Well for one you can't hide in the ideal of ignorance is bliss. " Im Austrian therefore its impossible for me to know these things". No everyone has to do a little old-fashioned reading and learn, be it an American, European or Asian.

You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?

reply

Well said.

reply

So you are another one of those people who had never heard of the thing called, "THE INTERNET" before you came to this board?

Wait....if that is so, how did you come to this internet board???? 

reply

I agree with you almost completely; asking who Halsey was instead of looking him up is lazy, there is an extensive wikipedia article about him only one google search away.

But here I disagree:

If you are of High school age or above, and have lived in the USA, Britain, Japan, or any Major westernized modern society with a credible education system... there is absolutely NO EXCUSE in not knowing who he is other than pure stupidity.



In any country but the USA and maybe Japan, Halsey and most of the other Generals and Admirals of the Pacific theater are almost completely unknown. At American Highschools you learn quite a bit about American History so an American student might learn at least somethings about Halsey, but can you also name a French General of the Napoleonic era? Or an Austrian General from World War 1? Probably not.

I am German and our history education at school should be quite similar to Austrian history lessons. The German history curriculum at Gymnasium (which is the school form we visit from 5th to 12th grade) starts with the pre-historic history, the European stone age and the bronze age, goes to Babylon, ancient Egypt, ancient Persia and then - after two years the first European history: ancient Minoan culture from Crete and ultimately the ancient Greece history where you will learn about the different polis (city-states like Sparta, Thebes, Athens) and how they differed, accustomed by a little Greece philosophy and the wars of Greece against Persia which is considered the true beginning of European history. Then, by approx. 7th grade it will jump to the Romans who conquered most of Europe, brought a lot of culture to central and northern Europe, roads, currency, scripture. The we have the founding of East-Rome, Constantinople, the demise of West-Rome (the actual Rome in Italy) during the Migration Era, the European early middle ages with Charlemagne whose heirs divided his empire into what was about to become Germany and France later, high and late medival era with crusades, British War of the Roses, British-French Hundred Years’ War, Protestant Reformation under Luther, Zwingli, Calvin, Thirty Years’ War about religion and domination, French revolution will take another LARGE part of the German curriculum, the American revolution will find a little space, too, the Napoleonic era which laid waste to the entire continent once again, the Revolutions of 1848 in almost all European countries to create first democratic structures and to abolish feudalism, the French-German war from 1870/71 which resulted in the first unified Germany (until 1871 there was not one Germany but dozens of German states like Prussia, Austria, Hessia, Saxonia, etc.), secret diplomacy and alliance systems that ultimately lead to World War 1, World War 1, Treaty of Versailles, First German Republic (the Weimar Republic) and its failures in checks and balances which allowed the Nazi Party to gain power, pre-war Nazi Germany including society, political system, racial laws, military build-up, Nazi Germany in World War 2, initial success, war crimes, holocaust, demise.
And when we are done with the history Nazi Germany, we are running out of time.

We actually are not taught military history. German history is almost exclusively social history. We learn of the U-Boat battle in the north Atlantic and the battle of Britain and the Attack on Pearl Harbor and the battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of the Bulge, but that is more or less it. We know the names and years of those battles but we are not taught how the battles were faught or who the officers were; we learn that the Bulge was the last uprising of the practically beaten Germany and that is more or less all we learn. Why? Because German history teaching is aimed at making people understand why things happened the way they did and what we have to learn to not have them happen again; the ‘details’ are not really that important in that philosophy. It is important to know that the wage of war turned at Stalingrad, it is not important to know that the German commander was General Field Marshal Paulus.

So I am sad to tell you: Nobody in Germany knows names like Halsey or Yamato and Nimitz is only known because we know that you have a really big ship named after him. Everybody knows Eisenhower but practically no one knows Bradley. And battles in the Pacific like Iwo Jima or Okinawa are unknown, too. Understanding them might be relevant for military historians but we do not educate people to become military historians at school.

I know quite a lot of military history throughout the world because I am personally interested in it, but that is only me. A good friend of mine is a history teacher at a public school and should he know the names Bradley and Patton, then only because he had watched the movie with George C. Scott; not because he learned so at school or later university. But do not think for a second that you would outwit him at any political or social development that happened in Europe since the year 750 BC.

reply

I agree with you almost completely; asking who Halsey was instead of looking him up is lazy, there is an extensive wikipedia article about him only one google search away.


Except he wasn't lazy. He was trolling.

The film only ever mentions Halsey by last name only.
Yet the asshat who started this thread mentioned him as William F Halsey.

Clearly he knew more than simply hearing the name on the movie and having "no idea who he is".

And as far as the rest of your argument where you disagree...

Every single European so far who has defended "Europeans not knowing who Halsey is"....
KNOWS who Halsey is. Including the one claiming he didn't.







I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

WHAT HALSEY DID WAS TAKE HIS FLEET INTO A TYPHOON AND LOSE SOME SHIPS! THEN HE DID IT AGAIN A SECOND TIME.
THEN ANOTHER MISTAKE WAS NOT LEAVING BATTLESHIPS TO DEFEND SURIGAO STRAIT AT THE BATTLE OF LEYTE GULF. THAT LED TO THE JAPANESE BATTLEFLEET TO SINK SOME DESTROYERS AND JEEP CARRIERS. IT COULD ALSO HAVE LED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE LANDINGS AT LEYTE AS HALSEY WAS OUT CHASING JAPANESE CARRIERS THAT WERE BAIT. THOSE CARRIERS HAD HARDLY ANY PLANES AND WERE INTENDED TO LURE HALSEY AWAY FROM SURIGAO STRAIT.
A GOOD BOOK ON THIS IS "THE LAST STAND OF THE TIN CAN SAILORS" AND THE HISTORY CHANNEL PROGRAM DOGFIGHTS "LEYTE GULF"

reply

Any reason why you are screaming your reply at everyone?

Your SHOUTING AT EVERYONE DOES NOT MAKE YOU MORE RIGHT.
And in fact much of your statement is wrong.


Yes, Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors is an excellent book.
But not about Halsey, especially not about Halsey and the typhoons.
It only touches upon Halsey and his actions during the Battle Off Samar and the Battle of Cape Engano. As much as is necessary to explain the setup and reasons for the battle Off Samar, which is what the book exclusively focuses on.


As far as the Typhoons goes... Trying to blame Halsey for that is stupid.

Halsey did not know of the powerful Typhoons and how bad they were in advance and say, "Frak it, lets go in anyways".

Meteorology and weather and storm forecasting was in it's infancy back then.
We did not have satellites, computer networked weather stations, and computer forecasting models.

They were not too far removed from a time when the best weather forecasting for ships at sea was little more than rule of thumb taken from ancient rhymes...

Red sky at night, sailors' delight.
Red sky at morning, sailors take warning


What they DID have is what local weather conditions could be measured at their location by their weatherman, and occasionally weather reports from other far flung locations.

But what was happening out on the vast openness of the Pacific Ocean... was anyone's guess but for the ships to actually sail into such waters.

Typhoon Cobra took everyone by surprise. By the time they even knew there was a storm of any sort ahead, they were within hours, maybe a day of encountering it. By the time they realized the full power and strength of the SuperTyphoon... it was too late.
Halsey cannot be blamed for that.



I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

But, the US Navy did blame Halsey for it. He was found by a Naval inquiry board type device... (insert appropriate name of disciplinary body here) to be in error both times he encountered the massive storms. The first time they opted not to punish him and the second it was recommended he be moved, but this was stayed by a higher authority.

I do not mean that he was entirely responsible, merely that it is important to remember that his actions were found wanting.

reply

An finding he had an error in judgement is not the same as "blaming him"

rather it was second guessing him in hindsight, which is why there was no punitive judgement against him.

You are reading a wiki article on it and drawing your own preconceived conclusions on it rather than reality.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Why the fook would European countries learn in high schools about USA WWII Admirals?

We learn about European history and our own countries. No one in Europe knows why and how this idiot bull fooked up your ships unless he is some kind of student of history or historian.

More than half of your people in your nation can't even name European countries and you blame Europeans for not knowing this idiot who *beep* you up in Pacific? Retarded Americans

reply

Can you name all 50 US states? You should, since without the US you'd be speaking German.

What you are apparently too stupid to understand is that the OP typed out Halsey's name into a movie chat board, when he could have just as easily typed it into Google and gotten his answer.

If he still didn't understand then ask. But, the OP was just a lazy azzhole. That's why he got so sh!t, and deservedly so.

reply

Why the fook would European countries learn in high schools about USA WWII Admirals?


Well, I guess you Europeans aren't as well educated as you think you are (must be all that socialism).

When I was in school, we learned of Rommel, de Gaulle, Yamomoto, Zhukov, Montgomery, etc. all contemporaries of Halsey. We also learned of the pharaohs, caesars, Khan, Alexander, Napoleon, Hanibal, Alexander, etc..

Retarded Americans


Maybe, but you'll fall to the Islamist before we do...




Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.

reply

Judging by some of the comments on this thread, I almost hesitate to contribute to it, but, to me, the interesting thing about that brief conversation between Ryan and Ramius is not so much what Halsey apparently did wrong (according to Ramius), but what Ryan said in his book that Ramius disagreed with so strongly - what were Ryan's views on Halsey's actions?

reply

It's a while since I saw this, but based on what I recall and the details of the conversation posted above, I would say it's more about Ramius's character than any specific comment on Halsey actions.

By claiming to have read the book, he's saying Ryan's important enough to have made his notice, but that he merely an academic and that Ramius knows better based on his experience as a navy officer.

reply

IT has been a while since I have read up on my WWII Pacific naval history, but I am pretty damn sure he ordered his big gun naval ships to attack what he thought was the main Japanese carrier fleet(what was left of it) during the battle of Leyte Gulf in the Philippines, not realizing that Japanese force was a decoy made of ships that appeared to be aircraft carriers.

While that occurred, another Japanese force of destroyers and or cruisers was sent to attack the naval landing ships, carrying the troops that were to land on Luzon. To this day, I really don't know how the Japanese screwed this one up(apparently the "Taffy something" force of landing ships and escort destroyers held their ground, and fought tooth and nail against the Japanese force, prompting an order to withdrawal, by the Japanese commander, which, if I can remember correctly, was not very popular(don't quote me on that).

The mistake was Halsey going for the decoy, and leaving his landing force exposed.

reply

You have the basic gist of it correct but you are wrong a lot in the details.

but I am pretty damn sure he ordered his big gun naval ships to attack what he thought was the main Japanese carrier fleet(what was left of it) during the battle of Leyte Gulf in the Philippines


While Halsey did have a number of Cruisers and Battleships with his force. It was NOT just the Big Guns he ordered to attack. Those big guns was there primarily as a protecting force for his Carriers. It was his Carriers of Halsey's 3rd Fleet that were going to attack Admiral Ozawa's Northern Force.


not realizing that Japanese force was a decoy made of ships that appeared to be aircraft carriers.


They WERE the Japanese Carriers. Not just decoys disguised to look like carriers. Yes the Japanese were using them as a decoy force but Halsey, Nor anyone else had any way of knowing the carriers were without aircraft and pilots. As far as the US Navy was concerned, Ozawa's Northern Force was a sizable and credible threat.

It was not a mistake on Halsey's part in falling for what turned out in HINDSIGHT to be a decoy force.


While that occurred, another Japanese force of destroyers and or cruisers was sent to attack the naval landing ships, carrying the troops that were to land on Luzon.


That other force was Admiral Kurita's Center Force. And it was one of the largest concentrations of Imperial Naval firepower ever assembled, not just an assemblage of some destroyers or cruisers.

4 Battleships
6 Heavy Cruisers
2 Light Cruisers
11 Destroyers

Admiral Halsey had the previous day, atracked the Center Force Sinking one of the other Battleships (Musashi), damaging Yamato, and several other vessels.
When Halsey took off after the Northern Force, Center Force was in retreat.


apparently the "Taffy something" force of landing ships and escort destroyers held their ground, and fought tooth and nail against the Japanese force, prompting an order to withdrawal, by the Japanese commander, which, if I can remember correctly, was not very popular(don't quote me on that).


Task Force Taffy 3.
There were no Landing Ships with Taffy 3. Taffy 3 was not the landing force. They were the northern most group of three task forces, each centered around a handful of small escort carriers, not full sized fleet carriers, and protected by a mere handful of of destroyers and destroyer escorts. Their job was to provide air to ground assistance to the landing troops.


The battle itself, known as The Battle Off Samar... was one heroic standoff that was quite literally the US Navy's Finest Hour.

3 destroyers and a little escort destroyer literally charged straight at the Japanese group I listed above. Just one of those Japanese Battleships, The Yamato, weighed as much in tonnage as all 13 American ships, including all 6 of the carriers. Just one of her Main Gun turrets weighed as much as the American Destroyer charging them. Not one of the American vessels had a gun large enough to penetrate the armor on the behemoths bearing down on them.

The Battle can be read about in great detail in James Hornfischer's book: Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors.

And don't worry... you can be quoted on it.
Kurita, Made a mistake in judging the tactical situation and decided to retreat.
In the victory or death mindset on Imperial Japan, it was a great shame which was levied at him for the remainder of his life.


The mistake was Halsey going for the decoy, and leaving his landing force exposed.


This is where you are completely wrong.

First off... It was not his landing force.

1) Taffy 3 was not the landing force. Taffy 1, 2, and 3 were stationed outside of Leyte Gulf in support of that landing force, their aircraft were armed with weapons suitable to providing support for ground troops and carrying out anti-submarine patrols.

2) Neither the Taffy Task Forces, or the landing forces belonged to Halsey nor were they in his chain of command at all. Halsey commanded the 3rd Fleet. He reported to his Superior, Admiral Nimitz at Pearl Harbor.

The Taffies and the Landing force were a part of the 7th Fleet, under the command of Admiral Kincaid. Kincaid reported to his superior, General Douglas MacArthur.

3) Halsey's 3rd Fleet while austensibly guarding rhe northern approaches to Leyte... ultimate responsibility for security lay with Kincaid and his 7th Fleet.

Kincaid had just that night before, decimated Japan's Southern Force as it tried to come through the Surigao Strait.

Halsey's orders were to assist Kincaid and to take a blocking position to the North. This he did and he attacked the Center Force as they were in the Sibuyan Sea making their way to the San Bernadino Strait. Center Force retreated.

However... Admiral Nimitz wrote an addendum to Halseys orders. It stated that if Halsey were to come across a significant portion of the Japanese fleet, That its destruction would then become his primary duty. Not guarding 7th fleet.

When Ozawa's Northern Force showed up... This is exactly what Halsey had. Halsey's orders allowed for his departing and going north after the decoy force.

Going after the Carriers and leaving 7th fleet unguarded was not his mistake.


The mistake, which was shared by Halsey, Kincaid, Nimitz, and many others including thier aides... is something else entirely.

Halsey had made provision to break off a part of his Battleship firepower forming a small group under the command of Admiral Lee, called Task Force 34. His intention was to leave TF34 behind guarding the San Bernadino Strait if he needed to be called away elsewhere. He sent a preparatory message detailing how TF 34 was to form if and when he directed them to do so.

Kincaid, not in the chain of command was still copying the messages so as to be aware of what Halsey was doing. Official communications had to go from Halsey to Nimitz at Pearl. To MacArthur and then to Kincaid. Halsey and Kincaid were close enough though that each was copying each others message traffic directly

When Halsey spotted Ozawa, Kurita was in retreat. Halsey felt no need to leave Lee and TF 34 behind and so took his entire force with him. No action message was ever sent instructing Lee to form TF 34.

Kincaid however, ASSUMED the previous preparatory message was an action message forming TF34. When Halsey tore ass northwards in persuit of Ozawa he thought Lee was remaining behind guarding his northern flank. He wasn't. Lee was still with Halsey.

Unknownst to Halsey himself, though reports did reach his staff, Kurita had turned around in his retreat and made again for San Bernadino Strait.

Dawn found Kurita exiting the Strait just off Samar Island, Halsey far to the north and out of position, Taffy 3 blissfully unaware....

Initial dawn reports of large warships to the north were mistaken by Taffy 3 as being Halsey's battleships. Then someone screamed out that they were pagoda masts, a unique characteristic of Japanese heavy warships.

The ships were over 20 miles away, far on the horizon. and 200' high towering geysers of water... shell splashes from the monstrous warships started erupting all around.

The Japanese were already within range.

The mistake was not in Halsey chasing after Ozawa. It was in his not forming TF 34 and leaving Lee behind.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

This is probably a waste of time, but...

the Third Fleet (and Halsey's) job was to guard the Leyte beaches and keep Kinkaid's 7th Fleet safe. Not to chase Japanese carriers. Yes, Halsey didn't know that Ozawa's carriers were without aircraft and as much of a threat as an Indian canoe. But he should have figured it out when the carriers approached and the fled without any airstrike.

And why the hell did it take Halsey three hours to turn after he got Kinkaid's message
"MY SITUATION IS CRITICAL. FAST BATTLESHIPS AND SUPPORT BY AIR STRIKES MAY BE ABLE TO KEEP ENEMY FROM DESTROYING CVES AND ENTERING LEYTE." - Kinkaid's message, sent uncoded and in the clear. And then he turned only after Nimitz expressly ordered it - "Where is TF 34?"

Halsey still smarted over missing the great Pacific carrier battles, Midway and Philippine Sea. The Japanese knew this and danged the carriers like Fudd dangling a carrot to Bugs Bunny. And Halsey played his part to a "T".


Your future's all used up.

reply

This is probably a waste of time, but...


Yes, it is because your entire position is based upon a fallacy of your own understanding as well as influenced by hindsight not afforded to Halsey at the time.


the Third Fleet (and Halsey's) job was to guard the Leyte beaches and keep Kinkaid's 7th Fleet safe. Not to chase Japanese carriers.


This is utterly incorrect. Nimitz's orders were very clear. "Should opportunity for destruction of a main component of Japanese naval forces materialize, or be made to materialize, such destruction is to become your primary objective."

Halsey's 3rd Fleet and Kincaid's 7th Fleet were two separate commands with two separate chains of command with no single common commander until the White House and Roosevelt himself.

7th Fleet's safety was ultimately entirely the responsibility of 7th Fleet, not 3rd.

Halsey's presense guarding the Northern Approaches was more a matter of convinience, His presense there and his orders were subject to alteration if certain conditions arise. Those condition did arise with the detection of Ozawa's Northern Force. He was under orders to guard the northern approaches to the landings only so long as he had no other more important priorities.

That is your fallacy and misunderstanding when you claim his orders were only to guard the landings and not to go after the carriers. In that you are absolutely incorrect.


And then he turned only after Nimitz expressly ordered it - "Where is TF 34?"


Nimitz's message concerning where is TF 34 was not an "express order to turn around".

As far as not responding to Kincaid's message. Halsey and Kincaid were not in the same chain of command. Halsey had his orders, Kincaid had his own.


Kincaid shares as much blame as Halsey for what happened at Leyte if not more so.

Kincaid's forces were more than enough to fully defend the landings. Kincaid's failure was in not redeploying his forces to cover the north when Halsey got pulled away. He did not do so because he ASSUMED that Halsey left TF 34 behind when he went North. He assumed this because he misunderstood a message that he was listening in on but was never meant for him.

Halsey sent a message detailing what actions his own forces were to take should he direct TF34 to be formed and left behind. He did not actually order the forming of TF 34. It was a preparatory message, not an action message.

Kincaid copied that message and mistakenly assumed it was an action message. When Halsey went north, taking all his forces with him including Lee's Battlewagons, Kincaid ASSUMED Lee was left behind and still guarding his northern flank. Kincaid thus failed to redistribute his own forces to cover.

When Halsey made his decision...
A) Kurita was in full retreat.
B) His orders stated that the offensive destruction of Japanese main body naval forces was now his primary objective, not statically guarding the 7th Fleet's flank.
C) He was aware that Kincaid was more than capable of defending his own should need arise.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Ask your Uncle Albert.

reply

What did Admiral Halsey wrong, according to Ramius?


He acted stupidly...

Sorry, couldn't resist.



Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.

reply