Adm. William F. Halsey
In one scene Jack says that he wrote a book about Admiral William F. Halsey. Who is he? What did Admiral Halsey wrong, according to Ramius?
shareIn one scene Jack says that he wrote a book about Admiral William F. Halsey. Who is he? What did Admiral Halsey wrong, according to Ramius?
shareAdmiral William F. Halsey. Who is he?
1st... A little about you. What is your background coming into this question?
The reason I ask is because William F. "Bull" Halsey is a MAJOR HISTORICAL FIGURE in the Pacific theater of WW2.
If you are of High school age or above, and have lived in the USA, Britain, Japan, or any Major westernized modern society with a credible education system... there is absolutely NO EXCUSE in not knowing who he is other than pure stupidity.
Not that you need to know every aspect of his history, but to not even to have heard of him is inexcusable.
Now if you are from some 3rd world sh!thole... Or maybe you're just a very young kid in elementary school... perhaps.
I'll answer who he is. And Yes I am very aware of what the supposed mistake is that Ramius is referring to (actually there are two possibilities, but only one of the more commonly talked about)
But HOW I respond depends on the legitimacy or inexcusability of your not even knowing who he is.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
Hi
I dont live in a *beep* country. I live in Vienna and I am proud to tell you, it is the most livible city in the world :D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercer_Quality_of_Living_Survey
I dont think that I have to apologize for not knowing who William THE BULL Halsey is. I am austrian, I dont like to put the shrimp on the barbie. Christopher Waltz and Arnold Schwarzenegger are from Austria. Austria is in Europe.
I would say, more than 90% of the people here in Austria dont know who Admiral Halsey is. Hell, I am pretty sure no one ever mentioned him and I never had an discussion about him and what he did. I am not familiar with the naval history of the USA. The only admirals I know are Admiral Nelson and Admiral Ackbar.
So please tell me more about this guy
[deleted]
Good, Austria is a country, we can agree on that.
But it is not a "sh!thole" country though.
Maybe you got confused over my message,
Anyway thank you.
The only one confused was you. What part of "IF" did you not understand?
I said IF you come from some 3rd world sh!thole....
And that was after stating IF you came from some modern westernized country...
I was putting forth two possibilities... not making a claim.
YOU fraked up and failed to understand.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
But it is not a "sh!thole" country though.
It is a bit surprising that this question isn't in the FAQ for this movie, considering how many times it's come up on the board. Of course, most people who ask actually know WHO Halsey was.
shareI was actually trying to find my sources I used during the last major discussion on this topic. Here I found the actual message to Halsey from Nimitz... easy enough. But on the previous thread, I had Halsey's message of intent regarding the formation of TF34, Kincaid's messages, Nimitz's orders to Halsey, all of it. Tried to find them last night and my google fu failed.
As for your last bit... yeah. Unless you just crawled out from under a rock, most educated people know of Admiral Halsey, even if all they know is that he was some bigshot US Admiral during WW2 and know nothing of the details of his career.
But to have never heard of him is inexcusable from any well developed and well educated nation.
If I, as an American, know who Admiral Lütjens is.... then he as an Austrian can know who Admiral Halsey is.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
But to have never heard of him is inexcusable from any well developed and well educated nation.
I do not condemn a whole group based upon one idiot either.
Which is why I added the caveat "if true" to my statement earlier.
Based upon your comment, if true... You guys are so insular and egocentric you put the false claims of American egocentrism to shame.
What an incredibly rude response to a simple question. You take arrogance to an impressive level and you really should consider medication. By the way, I am an educated man and I had never heard of Halsey. Maybe I did at some point in my life but I did not recognize the name.
shareOK so between myself and one other person who called the OP all sorts of names and was far ruder than I and coincidentally never did answer the question...
And whereas I actually went to great lengths to answer the OP regardless....
You chose ME to act against in the same manner you accuse me of.
And said nothing to the person who was far more rude than I and did not answer the question at all.
Funny how you chose to be the *beep* against. doing the very thing you dislike about me.
You choose the lesser of the two who were rude, and the one who actually took he time to answer anyways.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
Ok, usually I'm the guy who googles anything he comes across, but in this case, I have to sort of leap to the defense of a fellow Austrian.
Please bear in mind that not only our own naval history is pretty non-existent... well, we once had a navy, but that was almost 100 years ago when we were still under Habsburg rule, and even then, our navy always played second (or even third) fiddle to the army, but that the Pacific theatre of World War 2 also is regarded as a second-rate theatre around here. Not that it wasn't important (far from that), but there's virtually no connection whatsoever between Austria and, say, Leyte Gulf or Midway. Your argument on Raeder and Dönitz falls a bit flat there, since they both were directly involved in military actions against your navy in the Atlantic, but Halsey wasn't part of these engagements. Neither was Kurita (which, around here, most people would sum up with "Japanese Admiral, World War 2" around here as well, if they could actually say anything about him).
The Pacific theatre is also only mentioned briefly in history classes, it basically boils down to "Japanese spread across the Pacific, attack Pearl Harbor, got curb-stomped afterwards." with only brief mentions of key battles.
Hell, I only know one detail of the whole Taffy Three engagement: Captain Evans of the Johnston, badly burnt and virtually naked, screaming orders from a completely shot-up bridge. And I've only read of this guy because I was reading a series on military badasses and strange events in war.
I've never heard of Halsey myself before I saw "The Hunt for Red October" (and, to be fair, I was 13 when I first saw it and during puberty I had more interesting things to do than to look up US admirals), and from that little remark by Ramius I've only gleaned that he might have done something that worked despite being utterly wrong in the context of the situation (or the general perception of the moment), but he - basically - got lucky, the whole situation might have been a complete failure otherwise. Imagine Warren's blunder at the Spion Kop working out perfectly, or the Light Brigade managing to capture and hold the guns at the end of the valley. Or, the other way around, imagine Wittmann getting shot to pieces at Villers Bocage or Cain getting squished by the first tank he came across at Arnheim. How would we perceive these events today?
Sure, the OP might have done some research before. But he just asked a simple question regarding one tiny tidbit of a topic he wasn't familiar with just to get some info. I'm utterly baffled by the fact that, instead of just giving him a quick rundown on the action in question, namely Halsey falling for a decoy fleet during the Leyte gulf campaign instead of "staying at his post", so to speak, you immediately jumped to name-calling and belittling him for asking.
Sorry to break the news to you, CGSailor, but that's just plain asinine. I've seen quite a lot of your answers here on the boards, and especially in maritime matters I usually value your answers, but honestly, you're sometimes riding a pretty high horse.
Kung-Fu movies are like porn. 1-on-1 first, then 2-on-1, and then a group scene...
Sure, the OP might have done some research before.
So you are another one of those people who had never heard of the thing called, "THE INTERNET" before you came to this board?
Wait....if that is so, how did you come to this internet board????
If he did some research before, he wouldn't have needed to ask the question. There are several entries on Google about the subject of Halsey "acting foolishly."
I jumped his sh!t too because I don't like lazy people. To ask for more clarification is one thing; to not bother to type a few words into Google to find out on your own is lazy and that shouldn't be rewarded.
You should probably work on your reading comprehension if that remark was meant for me.
Still, the question stands: In times of oh-so-all-knowing Google, should asking questions before googling be shunned?
I should also mention that Googling, Binging, Yahooing or Asking will most likely garner you a less biased and less critical response than asking the question on Imdb.
I don't believe in the logic of 'there are no stupid questions'. I have always laid out a leveled ideal to my sailors. Do not be afraid to ask questions. But before you ask questions first you have to analyze whether or not you already know the answer to the question. Think first and then if you don't know the answer the next thing you do is try to figure it out yourself. Can I look in Pub, Tech or Rating Manual? Can I find the answer in the various portals online? Can I find the answer amongst my peers? If at that point you don't know than ask the question. Of course this would be dependent upon the nature of the situation, is it impending needing an answer immediately and so on.
Imdb is more in the spectrum of Editorials and Op-eds. There is a distinct base on Imdb that query who they consider to be SME's(Subject Matter Experts). That is a hit and miss game though. I don't feel the OP is doing that though, the OP is trolling.
You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?
I'll add to that by saying the first time I come to a movie / show's board, I read all of the trivia, goofs and crazy credits before I go to the discussion board. That way I already have a lot of questions answered.
And then I'll scroll through the first page of threads to see if there is already a thread about my question/subject. If there are only a couple of pages, I'll scroll through them all.
Not everyone is a troll, but I can't tell you the number of times someone asks a question which had 2 or 3 other threads and is explained in one of the first entries in the trivia or goofs section.
The extravagance with some trolls on IMDB is honestly an art form in their eyes. There is one guy that CGSailor and I are familiar with. The guy has at least a dozen active sock puppets. He spends a lot of time moving between accounts, talking to himself, piling in with all his socks and hijacking threads. He knows what he is doing and its fun for him. There are other trolls they don't even realize they are trolling, it just comes natural for them to troll for response.
I have an XO that labels all his Briefing Powerpoint "This is a GIYF Zone, Remember this before you ask any stupid questions". GIYF even transcends google now, it doesn't have to be google it can just be a general rule of thumb. Not being sexist in any way. The brief before the initial airstrike on ISIL for this particular CVW, a female F-18 pilot asks aloud "what does ISIL stand for, what is the difference between ISIL and ISIS, are they offshoots of one or the other?" GIYF.
You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?
I digress.....
First, the OP isn't innocent. His subject is 'Adm. William F. Halsey'. The movie never mention Adm. William F. Halsey in full name. All that is mentioned in the movie about Halsey is this:
Ryan- "I wrote a biography on Admiral Halsey called The Fighting Sailor about naval combat tactics."
Ramius- "I know this book, your conclusions were all wrong Ryan, Halsey acted stupidly."
So the OP basically is trolling. He knows enough about Halsey to call him William F. Halsey. So why look him up than ask the question like that? Trolling for a response, and gauging his picking at the responses he fulfills another part of the troll profile.
On to the other thing. Ignorance is not bliss. It matters not that you or he are in Austria and that in Austria Halsey is not a common topic. It also doesn't matter that Naval Warfare having never been a 'thing' in Austria therefore its no surprise that most people don't know about it. No I am confident that the general public in Austria have little knowledge of the minutiae surrounding military history. The same as the US public for that matter. These topics are not grade school subjects included in history courses. There is little if any inclusion of the name Halsey in US grade school text books. I am looking at my nephews history text book as I write. There is mention of the US Pacific Island Hopping Campaign and Admiral Halsey but that is it. So how does any one learn about this stuff? Well for one you can't hide in the ideal of ignorance is bliss. " Im Austrian therefore its impossible for me to know these things". No everyone has to do a little old-fashioned reading and learn, be it an American, European or Asian.
You're taking a dump and they call GQ do you pinch it off or finish your business?
Well said.
shareSo you are another one of those people who had never heard of the thing called, "THE INTERNET" before you came to this board?
Wait....if that is so, how did you come to this internet board????
I agree with you almost completely; asking who Halsey was instead of looking him up is lazy, there is an extensive wikipedia article about him only one google search away.
But here I disagree:
If you are of High school age or above, and have lived in the USA, Britain, Japan, or any Major westernized modern society with a credible education system... there is absolutely NO EXCUSE in not knowing who he is other than pure stupidity.
I agree with you almost completely; asking who Halsey was instead of looking him up is lazy, there is an extensive wikipedia article about him only one google search away.
WHAT HALSEY DID WAS TAKE HIS FLEET INTO A TYPHOON AND LOSE SOME SHIPS! THEN HE DID IT AGAIN A SECOND TIME.
THEN ANOTHER MISTAKE WAS NOT LEAVING BATTLESHIPS TO DEFEND SURIGAO STRAIT AT THE BATTLE OF LEYTE GULF. THAT LED TO THE JAPANESE BATTLEFLEET TO SINK SOME DESTROYERS AND JEEP CARRIERS. IT COULD ALSO HAVE LED TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE LANDINGS AT LEYTE AS HALSEY WAS OUT CHASING JAPANESE CARRIERS THAT WERE BAIT. THOSE CARRIERS HAD HARDLY ANY PLANES AND WERE INTENDED TO LURE HALSEY AWAY FROM SURIGAO STRAIT.
A GOOD BOOK ON THIS IS "THE LAST STAND OF THE TIN CAN SAILORS" AND THE HISTORY CHANNEL PROGRAM DOGFIGHTS "LEYTE GULF"
Any reason why you are screaming your reply at everyone?
Your SHOUTING AT EVERYONE DOES NOT MAKE YOU MORE RIGHT.
And in fact much of your statement is wrong.
Yes, Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors is an excellent book.
But not about Halsey, especially not about Halsey and the typhoons.
It only touches upon Halsey and his actions during the Battle Off Samar and the Battle of Cape Engano. As much as is necessary to explain the setup and reasons for the battle Off Samar, which is what the book exclusively focuses on.
As far as the Typhoons goes... Trying to blame Halsey for that is stupid.
Halsey did not know of the powerful Typhoons and how bad they were in advance and say, "Frak it, lets go in anyways".
Meteorology and weather and storm forecasting was in it's infancy back then.
We did not have satellites, computer networked weather stations, and computer forecasting models.
They were not too far removed from a time when the best weather forecasting for ships at sea was little more than rule of thumb taken from ancient rhymes...
Red sky at night, sailors' delight.
Red sky at morning, sailors take warning
But, the US Navy did blame Halsey for it. He was found by a Naval inquiry board type device... (insert appropriate name of disciplinary body here) to be in error both times he encountered the massive storms. The first time they opted not to punish him and the second it was recommended he be moved, but this was stayed by a higher authority.
I do not mean that he was entirely responsible, merely that it is important to remember that his actions were found wanting.
An finding he had an error in judgement is not the same as "blaming him"
rather it was second guessing him in hindsight, which is why there was no punitive judgement against him.
You are reading a wiki article on it and drawing your own preconceived conclusions on it rather than reality.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!
Why the fook would European countries learn in high schools about USA WWII Admirals?
We learn about European history and our own countries. No one in Europe knows why and how this idiot bull fooked up your ships unless he is some kind of student of history or historian.
More than half of your people in your nation can't even name European countries and you blame Europeans for not knowing this idiot who *beep* you up in Pacific? Retarded Americans
Can you name all 50 US states? You should, since without the US you'd be speaking German.
What you are apparently too stupid to understand is that the OP typed out Halsey's name into a movie chat board, when he could have just as easily typed it into Google and gotten his answer.
If he still didn't understand then ask. But, the OP was just a lazy azzhole. That's why he got so sh!t, and deservedly so.
Why the fook would European countries learn in high schools about USA WWII Admirals?
Retarded Americans
Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.share
Judging by some of the comments on this thread, I almost hesitate to contribute to it, but, to me, the interesting thing about that brief conversation between Ryan and Ramius is not so much what Halsey apparently did wrong (according to Ramius), but what Ryan said in his book that Ramius disagreed with so strongly - what were Ryan's views on Halsey's actions?
shareIt's a while since I saw this, but based on what I recall and the details of the conversation posted above, I would say it's more about Ramius's character than any specific comment on Halsey actions.
By claiming to have read the book, he's saying Ryan's important enough to have made his notice, but that he merely an academic and that Ramius knows better based on his experience as a navy officer.
IT has been a while since I have read up on my WWII Pacific naval history, but I am pretty damn sure he ordered his big gun naval ships to attack what he thought was the main Japanese carrier fleet(what was left of it) during the battle of Leyte Gulf in the Philippines, not realizing that Japanese force was a decoy made of ships that appeared to be aircraft carriers.
While that occurred, another Japanese force of destroyers and or cruisers was sent to attack the naval landing ships, carrying the troops that were to land on Luzon. To this day, I really don't know how the Japanese screwed this one up(apparently the "Taffy something" force of landing ships and escort destroyers held their ground, and fought tooth and nail against the Japanese force, prompting an order to withdrawal, by the Japanese commander, which, if I can remember correctly, was not very popular(don't quote me on that).
The mistake was Halsey going for the decoy, and leaving his landing force exposed.
You have the basic gist of it correct but you are wrong a lot in the details.
but I am pretty damn sure he ordered his big gun naval ships to attack what he thought was the main Japanese carrier fleet(what was left of it) during the battle of Leyte Gulf in the Philippines
not realizing that Japanese force was a decoy made of ships that appeared to be aircraft carriers.
While that occurred, another Japanese force of destroyers and or cruisers was sent to attack the naval landing ships, carrying the troops that were to land on Luzon.
apparently the "Taffy something" force of landing ships and escort destroyers held their ground, and fought tooth and nail against the Japanese force, prompting an order to withdrawal, by the Japanese commander, which, if I can remember correctly, was not very popular(don't quote me on that).
The mistake was Halsey going for the decoy, and leaving his landing force exposed.
This is probably a waste of time, but...
the Third Fleet (and Halsey's) job was to guard the Leyte beaches and keep Kinkaid's 7th Fleet safe. Not to chase Japanese carriers. Yes, Halsey didn't know that Ozawa's carriers were without aircraft and as much of a threat as an Indian canoe. But he should have figured it out when the carriers approached and the fled without any airstrike.
And why the hell did it take Halsey three hours to turn after he got Kinkaid's message
"MY SITUATION IS CRITICAL. FAST BATTLESHIPS AND SUPPORT BY AIR STRIKES MAY BE ABLE TO KEEP ENEMY FROM DESTROYING CVES AND ENTERING LEYTE." - Kinkaid's message, sent uncoded and in the clear. And then he turned only after Nimitz expressly ordered it - "Where is TF 34?"
Halsey still smarted over missing the great Pacific carrier battles, Midway and Philippine Sea. The Japanese knew this and danged the carriers like Fudd dangling a carrot to Bugs Bunny. And Halsey played his part to a "T".
Your future's all used up.
This is probably a waste of time, but...
the Third Fleet (and Halsey's) job was to guard the Leyte beaches and keep Kinkaid's 7th Fleet safe. Not to chase Japanese carriers.
And then he turned only after Nimitz expressly ordered it - "Where is TF 34?"
Ask your Uncle Albert.
shareWhat did Admiral Halsey wrong, according to Ramius?
Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.share