I agree with whitespirit. I haven't seen the movie yet, but much of what's being criticized is explained in the book. For example:
A female prisoner can simply put on the clothes of the "warden" and waltz right out of the prison/building.
The men living in this world live in just as much fear as the women. They too are expected to deny the existence of any sexual urges, and if they were caught looking too closely at a woman, they could be severely punished, even hanged. So they generally avoided looking at women period. That was why it was so easy for the main char's friend to sneak past the guards.
As soon as you round up all the fertile females you can find, and throw them into a gym and "brainwash" them, they'll automatically turn into a bunch of Moonies.
There are lots of psychology and sociology classes that cover things such as the power of groupthink, and the ability to control the masses by using fear. This is not at all unbelievable.
A ruling body obsessed with fertility won't bother to check the fertility of the men, only the women.
As whitespirit said, this is a dysfunctional, extremely patriarchal society. Only the women are checked for fertility, as it is assumed that all men are fertile. This is why, when Offred does not get pregnant, Serena Joy (the wife of the commadant) persuades her to sleep with the chaffeur. Serena badly wants a baby, and she knows it is likely her husband who is the infertile one, but she cannot do a thing about it. To say that it was his "fault" would be to challenge the very system itself.
Only Republicans are power crazy fanatics.
This ones just weird to me. Unless the movie makes up something that is totally not in the book, this simply isn't true. In fact, political parties are not mentioned at all in the book, and I remember getting the feeling that they no longer existed. (Of course, I only read it once, so I could be wrong on this point.)
reply
share