MovieChat Forums > Flashback (1990) Discussion > Why this movie was only good and not gre...

Why this movie was only good and not great *SPOILERS*


Fantastic acting and casting, especially from the two leads. The problem is, even for the 1990s the plot goes from realistic and great (the beginning train discussion between Huey and Buckner) to incredibly ridiculous. Two drunk small town yuppies decide to kidnap an FBI agent? And then two minutes later a guy running for congress tries to kill an FBI agent (once he knows he's really an FBI agent) and the other cops just follow along without asking any questions? Then the FBI director believes the small town idiot sheriff that Buckner was trying to help Walker escape enough to let him run an investigation while he waits to see what happens? And then the FBI director lets Buckner get away with letting Walker go because of some cock and bull story about Walker getting away from him twenty years ago? Really? At that point it really went from an 8 to a 6 for me, as if the writers were treating the viewer like a four year old child. I guess for once I can agree with the IMDB user ratings because this movie had so much potential with the great soundtrack, discussion of the 60s and 80s, and some great actors giving fine performances, but the weird and way over the top plot just killed it. Even for an 80s or 90s plot this was nuts. I wanted to love it because it was so endearing in a lot of ways, but it just was way too unbelievable. As a sort of weird nostalgia film this is good, but as a film in general this plot is insane at the best of times.

reply

I know this is an old thread, but I just finished Flashback after stumbling across it on Amazon and your post resonated with me.

I usually love these 80s road trip style, buddy cop type films. Seeing that Hopper and Sutherland were the leads I was hoping for a good night in. I too was along for the ride. Right up until the scene where Hopper gets Sutherland wasted on the train. From that moment on it goes from bad to worse.

With these fine actors it could have been pulled off so much better if it weren't littered with ridiculous plot points. The transformation of Hopper from a scruffy hippy to a slick FBI agent was perfect. The two characters could have had an excellent cat and mouse chase without the psychotic Sheriff and the communal upbringing of Sutherland by 'Maggie'.

With that said there were some moments at the end which was more reminiscent of classic 80s feel good movies. It's a pity the film lost it's way after the first act.

reply

Andy,

I agree on all points. You're right, it was after the first act that things went awry. I think they went a bridge too far on a few occasions, and it made the movie go from interesting crime drama to campy and unrealistic feeling. It's not the worst movie ever and is still good for a watch once in awhile, but it doesn't hold up well.

reply