MovieChat Forums > The Field Discussion > Message of The Field and Bull as a hero ...

Message of The Field and Bull as a hero SPOILERS


First watched this movie when it came out and I sided with the priest and Bull's son and what I think were the filmmaker's overall message: That Bull was wrong and a product of a past and culture that was dead and never worth living and dying for. But now, I side with Bull (Harris). The priest and the American and what they represent ( money and progress at the expense of spirit and soul)was worse than what Bull did. His son (Bean) I also changed my opinion of...and that Tinker's daughter IS BAD NEWS...lol. Some things that are holy and true and right are timeless and never change and Bull's adherence to that is true now as ever.

reply

As I said in another post, I don't think that this film has any clear-cut heroes, nor any clear-cut villains. The American developer is callous in his dealings with the people and community, while Bull behaves like a thug when he sees somebody stepping on his home turf. He was equally merciless when dealing with his family: presumably driving his younger son to suicide and his older son to running away with the traveler woman.

In the end, I probably had more sympathy for Bull and (as you remark) the dying way of life and culture he represented than I did for the developer, but he was far too deeply flawed a character to be thought of as the story's "hero."

reply

I mean "hero" in the classical Greek sense, not like some cowboy or superman definition, but good points you make. The priest, however...ughh...he totally sucks up and wimps out to Berenger.

reply

“The land is the only thing in the world worth working for, worth fighting for, worth dying for, because it's the only thing that lasts".....Gerald O'Hara, Gone With The Wind.” (Margaret Mitchell)

reply

I don't think there is any coherent message in this story. Whilst there are a lot of good things in this movie, the tale itself is just hackneyed Celtic Angst that doesn't take us anywhere. The whole 'this is my land' thing is overdone and bombastic. Even taking the view that the story's tone is ironic and that such obsession leads to madness, it is impossible not to see the effort as contributing to that cultural malaise of victimhood. We're doomed. Because we are Irish. Because of the troubles. And foreigners. And the famine. And Oh my God, what dark secrets we have...

As for the wealthy American interloper; this is hardly thinking outside of the box. It is a cringeworthy cliche.

Worth seeing just for Harris' performance tho.

reply

I don't think there is any coherent message in this story.
Just because you didn't get it?

I've had a lot of sobering thoughts in my time Del Boy, it's them that started me drinking!

reply

Bull is a flawed hero, or possibly a tragic hero. He feels his elder son (Seamie, who hanged himself 18 years ago) and his mother were sacrificed for the field. He has guilt over this, and he's obsessed with the field, and cannot bear the thought of losing it. It's sacred ground to him. And so he (unintentionally) murders the Yank, and alienates his remaining son, Tadgh, who is his pride and joy. But he ends up knowing that he's defiled his sacred field by committing murder over it. He's overwhelmed with guilt. Bull ends up losing everything, and I think at the end he's lost his mind.

The Yank was somewhat of a jerk. He looked down upon the villagers, and felt that he was doing the community a favor by paving over the field, building a hydroelectric plant, and mining limestone. He felt he was doing the community a favor, providing jobs, and raising them out of poverty, and if a few farming villagers (including Bull and his family) lost their livelihood, it was a small price to pay for the good of the community.

The priest was clearly a respected force in the village, and ought to have played a more forceful role as a mediator between the Yank, the Widow, and Bull McCabe. He did make a half-hearted effort to dissuade the Yank from buying the field and advised him to look elsewhere for a location for his construction projects. But the Yank was too stubborn and arrogant to consider this. The priest also suggested to Bull that he buy a different field, but Bull became furious at this, after all the sacrifices his family had made for generations in maintaining the field, and wouldn't consider it.

The priest had also become aware that the Widow, who lived alone, had been harassed for over 10 years over her ownership of the field. It was Tadgh (Bull's son) and Bird who'd been carrying out that harassment. Bull wasn't even aware of it until the priest told him about it. But the priest didn't care for Bull, considered him a bully, and didn't realize that Bull was unaware of the harassment. And until the confrontation in the church rectory, probably

reply

wasn't aware of how deeply emotionally attached to the land Bull was. The priest ought to have stepped forward and acted as a mediator between the Yank, the Widow, and Bull, and tried to arrange some sort of compromise. But that would have been extremely difficult to do, as all three were unwilling to come to any sort of accomodation. And therein was the tragedy. The Yank lost his life, Bull lost his son and all hope for the future, and probably his mind as well. The Widow will have to look elsewhere for a buyer for her field, and surely it will go for a lower price than she wanted. That's what happens when people are so obsessed with getting their own way, and are unwilling to compromise.

reply

[deleted]