Just happened to be looking for another movie and found this page.
LostHighway101 : There's a great deal of difference between simple human body nudity in a theatrical film like this one....compared to the horrible things some do to underage children in "those other" kind of disgusting films.
In the early '90s film "At Play In The Fields Of The Lord"....."native boys"
in early 20th century South America are shown full frontal,as is their tribal custom. One boy from the U.S.,who is there with his parents joins them in their ways in the jungle.
There's nothing even remotley sexual about it and it shows the innocence
of a child's perception at a young age. In other words,it's no big deal.
Seeing as how they're underage,their parents certainly wouldn't let them do that movie,if they felt there wasa danger or risk to their kids. This film or "A Cry In The Wild". You can be there's proper authority on the set to make sure things are as they should be.
There's other legitimat films that feature either gender and when that is sdone in a movie,it is in keeping with the storyline and again,those filmakers are not trying to be perverse but to tell an honest story and make a quality film.
It is unfortunate in the past 25 to 30 years that more "perverse" human beings have taken advantage of the innocence of children and scarring them for life.
In short,don't let "simple" nudity in any film or in life bother you. You should only be bothered by adults who harm children & teens in a nay violent or sexual manner.
As for Cr In the Wild,the boy was not undressed and had on proper underwear.
MAN! One dream's come true,ready for another.
(MR.) happipuppi13 *arf,man!*!
reply
share