MovieChat Forums > Twin Peaks (1990) Discussion > they should have revealed the killer in ...

they should have revealed the killer in the last episode...


When they revealed the killer in the middle of the second season, the episodes after that weren't that great...

reply

Apparently they didn't want to reveal who the killer was or at least Lynch didn't want to.

I recently watched the original series for the first time. Plan to watch fire walk with me soon then the new series. I've only seen a few of Lynch's films and while I enjoy the visual style he has im not keen on their ambiguity.

I feel like I came out of his films knowing less than I did originally. He has stated the best part of a mystery is the mystey which is true but I prefer to get some answers and see if im right.

I didn't know if I'd like the show because of this. I enjoyed the random clues that made sense later on but can't see how the show would have survived if they had never revealed the killer.

I suppose it is like a dark soap and they wanted to add other storylines but I don't think any of them where as good as the main mystery

reply

I agree with this 100%, All of the episodes after they revealed the killer (with the exception of the finale) were so bad and hard to watch. I want to forget that the Ben Horne civil war plot or the terrible actresses that played Evelyn and Lana ever happened.

reply

I disagree.

reply